New commercial standards in June question
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 451
New commercial standards in June question
Is there any benefit to passing the commercial check ride before the June date when they update the standards? I'm not familiar with how the private and instrument have already changed because I've had those a long time. Are the new standards 'harder' or just different?
#4
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,457
#5
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Did you see or hear me make that statement? The only one who has said any such thing is you. Put words in your own mouth, if you think you're capable.
Which is really quite irrelevant.
Do you not understand the function of ADF, or of an RMI?
If the new standards are "harder," does that mean you should rush to get it done while it's still "easy?"
How about simply learning to do it right? "Hard" or "easy" becomes irrelevant.
Or you could simply take the easy way out, if you believe that to be the case.
Do you not understand the function of ADF, or of an RMI?
If the new standards are "harder," does that mean you should rush to get it done while it's still "easy?"
How about simply learning to do it right? "Hard" or "easy" becomes irrelevant.
Or you could simply take the easy way out, if you believe that to be the case.
#6
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,457
Did you see or hear me make that statement? The only one who has said any such thing is you. Put words in your own mouth, if you think you're capable.
Which is really quite irrelevant.
Do you not understand the function of ADF, or of an RMI?
If the new standards are "harder," does that mean you should rush to get it done while it's still "easy?"
How about simply learning to do it right? "Hard" or "easy" becomes irrelevant.
Or you could simply take the easy way out, if you believe that to be the case.
Which is really quite irrelevant.
Do you not understand the function of ADF, or of an RMI?
If the new standards are "harder," does that mean you should rush to get it done while it's still "easy?"
How about simply learning to do it right? "Hard" or "easy" becomes irrelevant.
Or you could simply take the easy way out, if you believe that to be the case.
"Learning to do it right". Funny. You haven't done a FAA knowledge test in a while have you? Yes, I understand ADF and RMI very well, thank you. But I also know that (calculating distance based on ADF needle movement) is a skill I will never, ever need in any sort of flying context, so learning that is simply wasted time and energy. It's simple trigonometry, but to have 6 questions on a knowledge test about it, when no-one maintains situational awareness that way, is just wasting 6 questions which could test something more relevant.
The new standards are different, not harder or easier, assuming they will do what they did with PP and IR when they went PTS->ACS. Easier in a way because they are removing the irrelevant garbage questions (such as, which button to push on a remote compass to turn it towards heading X), harder because it now has more scenario-based questions, which require wider comprehension of the topic, instead of just memorizing the old BS questions.
#8
If you're just wrapping up the CPL during that time frame, it would be better to take the ride under the old standards...
1. That's what the instructors having been training you towards.
2. That's what they know how to train you towards.
3. That's what the examiners know how check.
If you're on the bleeding edge of something like this, you're a test pilot. We just went through a change of training process at my airline on a particular airplane, and had about a 50% bust rate the first week.
1. That's what the instructors having been training you towards.
2. That's what they know how to train you towards.
3. That's what the examiners know how check.
If you're on the bleeding edge of something like this, you're a test pilot. We just went through a change of training process at my airline on a particular airplane, and had about a 50% bust rate the first week.
#9
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,457
#10
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,457
If you're just wrapping up the CPL during that time frame, it would be better to take the ride under the old standards...
1. That's what the instructors having been training you towards.
2. That's what they know how to train you towards.
3. That's what the examiners know how check.
If you're on the bleeding edge of something like this, you're a test pilot. We just went through a change of training process at my airline on a particular airplane, and had about a 50% bust rate the first week.
1. That's what the instructors having been training you towards.
2. That's what they know how to train you towards.
3. That's what the examiners know how check.
If you're on the bleeding edge of something like this, you're a test pilot. We just went through a change of training process at my airline on a particular airplane, and had about a 50% bust rate the first week.
Just like you said - I'd avoid being an "early adopter" when FAA changes something.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post