Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Departue Procedures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2007, 06:23 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Squawk_5543's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Lav
Posts: 992
Default

I know this may sound crazy but I before I even started my IRA training, I was learning how to read and fly plates, DP's and STARs using MS Flight Simulator. You would be amazed how accurate that program is when it comes to flying IFR. By the time I was into my training, I had already gotten used to the charts and it made things alot easier.
Squawk_5543 is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 06:30 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
MEMpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
Default

Yeah Flight Simulator is great for them. I use DPs and SIDS all the time through the FMC. However, I'm flying a 777 normally!

I know I should be practicing with a smaller aircraft, but when you have the option of such a magnificient aircraft, why bother chugging along in a Cessna?

The problem with Flight Simulator is that it doesn't simulate the complexities of ATC and their relation to navigation. To me, this is extremely important. It's easy to use a DP on Flight Sim, but even harder to be waiting for a clearance that could have limitless possibilities. Flight Sim's ATC is so predictable and pretty ridiculous in general. I wish Microsoft would do something about that...
MEMpilot is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 06:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.
Posts: 897
Default

Originally Posted by MEMpilot View Post
Yeah Flight Simulator is great for them. I use DPs and SIDS all the time through the FMC. However, I'm flying a 777 normally!

I know I should be practicing with a smaller aircraft, but when you have the option of such a magnificient aircraft, why bother chugging along in a Cessna?

The problem with Flight Simulator is that it doesn't simulate the complexities of ATC and their relation to navigation. To me, this is extremely important. It's easy to use a DP on Flight Sim, but even harder to be waiting for a clearance that could have limitless possibilities. Flight Sim's ATC is so predictable and pretty ridiculous in general. I wish Microsoft would do something about that...
Hats off to that! Most of the time I don't even use atc on FS. I just take off in the DC-8, follow the DP, climb enroute, follow the STAR, follow the approach procedures and land. The ATC on FS also seems to decend me to the ILS intercept altitude 20+ MILES OUT! Then take me on this huge arc for vectors to intercept the localizer. LOL! I just chime into center every now and then but for the most part, I ignore ATC on the sim. Do you ever go to flightsim.com?? Lots of great aircraft, panels, sounds, etc.. All free!
blastboy is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 07:16 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
cheyennedrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: PA31T2
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by 172capt View Post
Just wandering what your thinking is here because I thought DP's and STAR's where there to ease workload and free up the radios for everyone including the pilot but mainly for the controllers.

Yes, I agree 100%, however when you super high performance C150 won't meet the climb gradient or you have prefered routes avail it seemed easier at the time. I was just giving some options, no offense taken.

Ah yes the kingdom five, I am sure I can do it in my sleep same with the knead five. I mean how silky smooth is ABQ direct ABI knead five.
cheyennedrvr is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 07:55 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mistarose's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by MEMpilot View Post
Perhaps the lesson is that DPs and STARS should be emphasized more in Instrument training? Especially for those wanting to advance into a career...
I agree, just dificult since the majority of them are designed for larger, faster aircraft. Not the aircraft typically used as an IFR trainer.
mistarose is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 09:10 PM
  #16  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Originally Posted by cheyennedrvr View Post
Yeah, or you just could have put "NO DP / NO STAR" in the comment box of your flight plan.

When I was CFI'n in SoCal thats what I would have my students do on our long x/c's. Works out better for everyone that way.
Bingo, first thing I thought.

Originally Posted by MEMpilot View Post

Perhaps the lesson is that DPs and STARS should be emphasized more in Instrument training? Especially for those wanting to advance into a career...
It's not always the CFI's responsibility to identify the students weak points. Also, just because you can pass the test, doesn't mean 100% proficiency, just means you're good enough not to kill yourself for the time being, and you can go wander out and learn more about what you are doing(this applies to IFR or PPL). DP's are a small part of what we do, hence the concentration on them. They are simple in 90% of the cases, just read what it says, and do it!

Now onto practice. Since you mentioned FS, use an appropriate aircraft to replicate what you fly, and go for it. DP's are one of the easier procedures to fly, because you have time to set-up on the ground. This is key, SET IT UP ON THE GROUND!!!! If you are departing a larger airport, and know you're going to get one, get your clearance early, and study it before you even fire up the engine.

One big thing with clearances, is write as they read it to you, use abbreviations/symbols for things. They give you the Memphis 7, or whatever moniker. Just write M-7/Mem-7, something short, then followed by what VOR etc.... Then you can go back after it was read and make it long-hand so you can re-read what you actually wrote.

Ever use CRAFT???? Pre-write in a few things, and if it's what you predicted, you leave it alone, such as "As filed" or your final altitude.

Clearance: Destination/intermediate fix(Don't see these very often)
Route: AF(As filed)/ Mem-7 dyr Direct(or for the unlucky ones, throw some Victor Airways in there)
Altitude: 4-7(4000, expect 7 in 10)
Freq: If given a DP, it's 50% that the freq might not be given, it's on the chart
Transponder: Self-explainatory, eh?

So if I filed direct my destination out of MEM, which would be to the north/northeast, I'd probably plan on the fact I'd get the M-7, especially during peak/day hours. So here's what I'd write down pre-contact to Clearance Delivery

C: Destination
R: A/F-
A: 7
F: 124.15
T: _____

Clearance recieved and I would just add the new stuff behind what I had already written, and you're taken care of. Never be afraid to ask for VOR identifiers for clarification. ATC would rather you ask on the ground than going somewhere wrong in the air.

Here's a fun example:
I went out of JFK once(3am) and was given an ugly clearance, with a DP and VOR/V-A's all the way to my airport(mind you NY-Indiana, at least 500nm+) So with me being /G, I was a little peeved, so I got identifiers for the 9 VORS and airways I'd be using. Of course, I departed, straight climb to 8000, and they asked what heading direct destination was I got a funny reaction from all the controllers until I was 1/2 through PA. I guess they don't do a lot of that out there, hehehe

Of course I can't finish out with saying welcome to the IFR community, and Good Luck on the DP's in the future!!!!!
Ewfflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAL EWR
Major
146
10-13-2008 09:15 PM
HSLD
Part 135
7
03-04-2007 08:06 AM
avi8tor4life
Regional
7
02-09-2007 08:49 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
5
11-28-2006 10:03 AM
FlyerJosh
Corporate
0
06-08-2006 08:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices