Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

One last training question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2022, 06:25 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927 View Post
This is why I think the independent Cfi might be cheaper and maybe better for me in the long run, just so much to think about. The block package training would be in a Grumman AA5 at 180 an hour and 60 with a CFI as compared to 120 for a cesna 150 and 45 the cfi time. Just in that alone I’d save almost 4k if I need an instructor for every single hour flown past the 44. Just a lot to process for someone who doesn’t really know anyone else in the aviation industry to ask besides you guys.

I advised a cousin (older career changer) to consider an independent CFI instead of a puppy mill. The CFI then flaked out on him and he lost his enthusiasm for aviation.

With an independent, you need to evaluate their stability and reliability... how long have they been teaching at this location, how many students do they train each year, how old are they, and do they have other career aspirations beyond CFI?

Too many students could mean you'll have trouble scheduling when you need to. If you're training full time and can fly whenever that will maximize your scheduling opportunities. Too few students might mean they have other jobs or businesses which might be a priority to them.

Young, airline-oriented CFI's will not stick around for long at all. If you work with one, need to know how close they are to ATP/R-ATP mins, because they'll be gone the next day when they hit that threshold. They might have R-ATP eligibility at 1000 or 1250 hours based on where they went to college.

That also applies to a small school where Mom & Pop are instructors... they might lose their young CFI's to the airlines, but does it appear that the owners will stick around?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 07:19 AM
  #12  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Be cautious of a C150.

The Cessna 150 has an average empty weight of 1,122 pounds and a gross weight of 1600 pounds, meaning its effective useful load is around 478 pounds. It has a typical fuel capacity of 26 gallons which means the full fuel useful load is approximately 322 pounds
Over years the weight may vary considerably from “new”.
That’s two 150lbs individuals with two flight bags.
I’ve worked at a school where the difference in empty weight between two C152’s was a staggering 80lbs (!) which meant I could fly one plane with a particular student and not another.
This was unfortunately frequently ignored by the school in question.

In short you may be fuel limited in that C150 which means you’ll be limited to lesson duration which may make it essentially useless.

Also it would be beneficial to do your instrument rating in the same make and model as your Private. This will save you 5-6 hrs of getting used to the airplane.
I doubt that C150 is adequately equipped.

As far as the 141 school, we averaged 44 hrs for a Private so they may very well be on par with that number.
Plan for 20-25% higher budget.

In general I would recommend against a self employed independent CFI as they’re unsupervised and are not held responsible for the students progress or lack thereof.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 07:46 AM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
In general I would recommend against a self employed independent CFI as they’re unsupervised and are not held responsible for the students progress or lack thereof.
Totally variable depending on the individual. Do your homework, and ask around the airport (and GA community if you know anyone).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 07:46 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927 View Post
Also, I would be positioned for an R-ATP from the community college I’ll be attending after PPL, but I must get this first hurdle out of the way and be prepared to attend during the summer session to start instrument training.
You only get the R-ATP if the 141 program you train under is approved, and in conjunction with, your community college or university.

Training at a 141 school and separately doing some sort of aviation degree at an unrelated college/university does not make you eligible for R-ATP.
TipTanks is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 01:21 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by TipTanks View Post
You only get the R-ATP if the 141 program you train under is approved, and in conjunction with, your community college or university.

Training at a 141 school and separately doing some sort of aviation degree at an unrelated college/university does not make you eligible for R-ATP.
The schools I have looked at use FTA affiliates for their training it appears. Liberty uses US Aviation in the Denton TX area and would net the 1000 hr RATP. Tarrant County Community college also uses US Aviation Academy but at Allliance airport in the DFW area and would offer the 1200 hr RATP since it would be a 2 year degree. Neither have an actual flight school , but just I guess contract for the students to fly at US Aviation Academy.
tsimmns927 is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 01:23 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Be cautious of a C150.



Over years the weight may vary considerably from “new”.
That’s two 150lbs individuals with two flight bags.
I’ve worked at a school where the difference in empty weight between two C152’s was a staggering 80lbs (!) which meant I could fly one plane with a particular student and not another.
This was unfortunately frequently ignored by the school in question.

In short you may be fuel limited in that C150 which means you’ll be limited to lesson duration which may make it essentially useless.

Also it would be beneficial to do your instrument rating in the same make and model as your Private. This will save you 5-6 hrs of getting used to the airplane.
I doubt that C150 is adequately equipped.

As far as the 141 school, we averaged 44 hrs for a Private so they may very well be on par with that number.
Plan for 20-25% higher budget.

In general I would recommend against a self employed independent CFI as they’re unsupervised and are not held responsible for the students progress or lack thereof.
Thanks for this, gives a lot of insight. If I could get my private between 44-55 hrs I’d be ok. However, I’ve read it takes most people 60+ hrs and I’ve like to consider the high side of what I’d be spending before I went the route with them.
tsimmns927 is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 01:27 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I advised a cousin (older career changer) to consider an independent CFI instead of a puppy mill. The CFI then flaked out on him and he lost his enthusiasm for aviation.

With an independent, you need to evaluate their stability and reliability... how long have they been teaching at this location, how many students do they train each year, how old are they, and do they have other career aspirations beyond CFI?

Too many students could mean you'll have trouble scheduling when you need to. If you're training full time and can fly whenever that will maximize your scheduling opportunities. Too few students might mean they have other jobs or businesses which might be a priority to them.

Young, airline-oriented CFI's will not stick around for long at all. If you work with one, need to know how close they are to ATP/R-ATP mins, because they'll be gone the next day when they hit that threshold. They might have R-ATP eligibility at 1000 or 1250 hours based on where they went to college.

That also applies to a small school where Mom & Pop are instructors... they might lose their young CFI's to the airlines, but does it appear that the owners will stick around?
I don’t think at either place I would have to worry about the CFI leaving. The independent instructor has over 2k hrs and does pipeline patrol 3 days a week in the town I live in. She has made it clear she be willing to fly whenever I’m available. Also, the 141 school has mostly retired military guys giving instruction, but then again the instruction would be in a Grumman Cheetah and I’d definitely not be doing an instrument rating in that. But then again, the 150 the independent CFI has I wouldn’t be using for instrument rating either. So much to consider, but you guys have gave me a lot to ponder.
tsimmns927 is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 02:05 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927 View Post
The schools I have looked at use FTA affiliates for their training it appears. Liberty uses US Aviation in the Denton TX area and would net the 1000 hr RATP. Tarrant County Community college also uses US Aviation Academy but at Allliance airport in the DFW area and would offer the 1200 hr RATP since it would be a 2 year degree. Neither have an actual flight school , but just I guess contract for the students to fly at US Aviation Academy.
Yep. Familiar with both of those, and both are legitimate programs.

I think I said this in another thread somewhere, but also don't overvalue the R-ATP....the difference between instructing to 1000 hours and 1500 hours is a matter of 4-6 months if you're busting it instructing full time. IIRC you're using GI Bill so you will have to end up in a 141 program, but unless the degree portion is free you have to weigh that cost into the decision, and I wouldn't value it very highly.

At this current point in history, degrees aren't required to be an airline pilot. I'm still in favor of people getting a degree, but I think of it more in terms of workforce competitiveness should the airline industry have its next once-in-a-lifetime meltdown. And in that doomsday scenario, a degree in aviation science or whatever is less marketable than a business degree you could get for the same money.
TipTanks is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 04:34 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
crbnftprnt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: B747-400 Cpt retired
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927 View Post
Thanks for this, gives a lot of insight. If I could get my private between 44-55 hrs I’d be ok. However, I’ve read it takes most people 60+ hrs and I’ve like to consider the high side of what I’d be spending before I went the route with them.
If you fly a lot (3 times a week, say, which means, with weather and other contingencies scheduling 4-5 times a week) you should be able to get it done in 50 or less. The 65-hour average is accurate, and comes from students dragging the process out much too long.
crbnftprnt is offline  
Old 01-17-2022, 04:40 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by TipTanks View Post
Yep. Familiar with both of those, and both are legitimate programs.

I think I said this in another thread somewhere, but also don't overvalue the R-ATP....the difference between instructing to 1000 hours and 1500 hours is a matter of 4-6 months if you're busting it instructing full time. IIRC you're using GI Bill so you will have to end up in a 141 program, but unless the degree portion is free you have to weigh that cost into the decision, and I wouldn't value it very highly.

At this current point in history, degrees aren't required to be an airline pilot. I'm still in favor of people getting a degree, but I think of it more in terms of workforce competitiveness should the airline industry have its next once-in-a-lifetime meltdown. And in that doomsday scenario, a degree in aviation science or whatever is less marketable than a business degree you could get for the same money.
How Much would you value the difference is 250 hrs in the RATP. That would be the difference between Liberty being a 4 year degree vs Tarrant being a 2 year program.
tsimmns927 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skippy96
Career Questions
7
11-05-2019 05:00 PM
ZipZap
JetBlue
190
09-17-2019 07:44 PM
docav8tor
Safety
7
08-18-2019 04:04 PM
blaquehawk99
Flight Schools and Training
29
06-11-2015 09:51 AM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices