Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Help with a research project?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2008, 11:36 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 92
Exclamation Help with a research project?

I would be very appreciative if you could take a few minute to complete an on-line survey asking about your opinions and experiences in instrument flight training.

If you could forward the link to any other pilots you know that would be great. The larger the sample size, the better the results.

Thanks in advance!


Instrument Survey
Inconceivable is offline  
Old 07-29-2008, 06:23 AM
  #2  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Some questions need specification:

1.Newly certificated instrument pilots are ready to fly analog aircraft immediately after passing the checkride:

(Ok, is this assuming check-ride and training in glass ****-pit, or anything?)

2. Two questions back-to-back are excessive, one can be removed

"Procedural mastery is(or not) as important as aircraft control in instrument flight:"

3. Maybe some options within the survey for different back-grounds. Some questions seem to be left a little open on their true intent.



Basically here's my overall feel towards instrument training. I feel all students should have to learn on basic 6-pack analog instruments, supplemented with GPS/VOR/LOC navigation, with approach capability. NDB approaches should be learned because it is a great skill to have, but not really practical, just like On-pylon 8's. These are all base-skill sets that must be learned before you can move onto other aspects, mainly learning complex instrumentation, systems, and glass panels. Glass can be picked up pretty easily from my own experience with it. I flew with a guy that had only G1000 time and he couldn't do anything in a standard panel w/ HSI after having 1000+hrs, sad really. Glass panels do not teach a good scan in my mind either, and lack-luster skills because most have auto-pilots, and I really feel hand-flying is the only thing to be allowed until you complete the rating. I could go on forever, but I won't.......enjoy
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 03:44 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N0315's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: CFII
Posts: 184
Default

I agree with EWR, but also glass does not make you THINK about situational awareness. Its all on a screen. In IMC, you NEED to know where you are without it being shown to you on a map.
N0315 is offline  
Old 07-30-2008, 03:56 AM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

Very true on the SA. How many people who fly all glass have looked down at their MFD and said, what state am I in? (Not G1000 or Avidyne because it tells you)

Now for the people who have said that, what would the odds of that happening have been back in training. I could tell you and taught my students to know where they are to within the space their thumb covers on the charts.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 07-31-2008, 07:43 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Am I the other one who finds it funny that they block out ****-pit?
CaseyP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Regional
18
07-18-2008 02:10 PM
bertengineer
Hangar Talk
4
06-09-2008 10:05 AM
tprangner
Major
39
04-18-2008 06:46 AM
bertramcheeks22
Cargo
1
11-19-2007 06:49 AM
bertramcheeks22
Major
0
11-18-2007 12:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices