Originally Posted by the King
(Post 459327)
Leave your limit (that is not the IAF) at EFC if you have it. If not, leave at a time that will allow you to begin an approach at ETA. I understand this, but if you're not GPS/RNAV equipped and are using VOR's, how are you going to navigate to your clearance limit which is the airport? I think an IAF is appropriate in this situation. |
If you are /U, there has to be a VOR nearby somewhere, probably at the field. That's where you go. If there is no VOR, and you can't navigate to the field directly, then that might be a good cause for 91.3 and you can choose to go to the IAF, just make sure you know why you chose that.
|
Originally Posted by the King
(Post 460098)
If you are /U, there has to be a VOR nearby somewhere, probably at the field. That's where you go. If there is no VOR, and you can't navigate to the field directly, then that might be a good cause for 91.3 and you can choose to go to the IAF, just make sure you know why you chose that.
|
Originally Posted by atlmsl
(Post 460263)
Alright, I think we're finally on the same page. I'm willing to bet that the reg was written before GPS and therefore is not inclusive of direct navigation. I'd be interested to hear a FSDO explaination of this.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands