Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Explaining Va (maneuvering speed) >

Explaining Va (maneuvering speed)

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Explaining Va (maneuvering speed)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2009, 06:38 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mitragorz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: C402, on the side with the switches!
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
Va decreases as weight decreases. Va increases as weight increases.

Although fjetter did get those numbers backwards. Higher with higher; lower with lower.
Correct, but you just said "Va decreases with weight." You didn't specify an increase or decrease with weight, but when someone says "X decreases (or increases) with Y" it's assumed that Y is increasing. At least that's how I've always seen in presented. Could be a regional (geographical, not airline) thing. Like "Air temperature decreases 2C with every thousand feet" or "Air pressure decreases with altitude."

Although I guess after re-thinking the way you said it, I picture weight "with" Va, holding hands and strolling down a merry decline together. So yeah, Va would be decreasing with weight . So i guess you could say it like that too. I just never heard that kind of statement worded that way.

Just didn't want to confuse the guy. When I read what you wrote, I assumed you meant an increase in weight. Just a matter of semantics, I guess .
Mitragorz is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 09:58 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
Va decreases as weight decreases. Va increases as weight increases.

Although fjetter did get those numbers backwards. Higher with higher; lower with lower.
So what if the aircraft moves into another category. For example, light cessna moves from normal into utility?
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 10:26 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by Mitragorz View Post
Just didn't want to confuse the guy. When I read what you wrote, I assumed you meant an increase in weight. Just a matter of semantics, I guess .
No, you're right. My explanation should have been clearer.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 10:43 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234 View Post
So what if the aircraft moves into another category. For example, light cessna moves from normal into utility?
Huh?

Maneuvering speed is a structural-related limitation. I'm not sure that it does change with the aircraft's category. The general rule that the max gross weight number is always listed (if there's only one number, it's for max gross). Listing others is pretty much optional, although airplanes that have a wider range of possible weights will tend to list more since Va for 6-seat airplane with lots of fuel and baggage capacity will be significantly lower when someone flies it solo with only a headset and a kneeboard with only 1 hour of fuel left. So I guess that if utility category means less max gross, a manufacturer might well opt to list a Va for max weight when operating in that category.

btw, I don't think anyone mentioned it, but the formula for calculating maneuvering speed (or any load limited V-speed for that matter) at any weight is

V1=V2 * Sq Root (W1/W2)

Where:
V1=Airspeed being calculated
V2=Published airspeed for a given weight
W1=Weight for which airspeed is to be determined
W2=Gross weight for which airspeed is published
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 11:17 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
Huh?

Maneuvering speed is a structural-related limitation. I'm not sure that it does change with the aircraft's category. The general rule that the max gross weight number is always listed (if there's only one number, it's for max gross). Listing others is pretty much optional, although airplanes that have a wider range of possible weights will tend to list more since Va for 6-seat airplane with lots of fuel and baggage capacity will be significantly lower when someone flies it solo with only a headset and a kneeboard with only 1 hour of fuel left. So I guess that if utility category means less max gross, a manufacturer might well opt to list a Va for max weight when operating in that category.

btw, I don't think anyone mentioned it, but the formula for calculating maneuvering speed (or any load limited V-speed for that matter) at any weight is

V1=V2 * Sq Root (W1/W2)

Where:
V1=Airspeed being calculated
V2=Published airspeed for a given weight
W1=Weight for which airspeed is to be determined
W2=Gross weight for which airspeed is published
Va for light aircraft, the manufacturer bases it on load limit factors. Going from category to category changes the load limit factors (3.8normal to 4.4utility). A 4.4 load limit will allow more airspeed at less weight. Notice how 172s' are placarded with "Va = 105". The safety factor is 1.5 for structural items.

Usually the formula used for (light aircraft manufacturers) Va is Va = stallspeed * sqrt(limit positive load limit factor)

One thing to consider doing, let say aerobatics, is that certain high-g maneuvers require a higher entry speed than Va. Of course these maneuvers are symmetrical, but it really just depends on the amount of residual energy. I think Assymetrical loading has a little more to do with a Vd/Va interpolation.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 11:51 AM
  #26  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

It's been a few years since I've done one, and we did them ad-nauseum in aersopace college of course but a given manufacturer submits a "VN Diagram" for a new airplane design to the FAA or their designate which must be approved. V stands for velocity in feet per second, and N is load factor. It looks like the ones you see in pilot textbooks, but with a gust envelope added as well, see diamond shaped envelope shown in this one:

Cubdriver is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 12:34 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234 View Post
The safety factor is 1.5 for structural items.
Just in case we have some european readers, ultimate load factor for them is two times limit load factor for their certifications.

To clear this up since I have had a bunch of questions arise from speaking of limit load and ultimate load factor:

Limit load factor = the published g limitations in your POH and the point where structural damage can occur.

Ultimate load factor = as Ryan said, in the USA 1.5 times limit load or two times it in Europe. This is the point where structural damage is certain and items may begin to come off the aircraft. Ryan: Is it may come off or will come off at ULF? I can't recall for certain.
shdw is offline  
Old 10-15-2009, 07:35 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by shdw View Post
Ryan: Is it may come off or will come off at ULF? I can't recall for certain.
I have really no idea at all.... my only slightly educated guess would be that it is based off the "weakest link" - that is maybe the wings will hold on but the engine mounts might go or vis-a-vis... or maybe it's when detectable damage occurs.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 07:08 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

We just got a Ops Bulletin regarding Va again and thought I would share it.
I re-read this thread before posting and agree that there certainly is some confusion

From the Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (Jan 18, 2011):
The design maneuvering speed (VA) is the speed below which you can move a single flight control, one time, to its full deflection, for one axis of airplane rotation only (pitch, roll or yaw), in smooth air, without risk of damage to the airplane.
The regulations governing the design strength requirements for airplane structure require adequate strength for full control deflection (below VA). However, they do not require the manufacturer to make the airplane strong enough to withstand full control input followed by a full control input in the
opposite direction, even below VA. Neither do they require the manufacturer to design the airplane for more than one simultaneous full control input such as full ailerons with full elevator and/or rudder.
VA, as published in the airplane flight manual (AFM) or pilot’s operating handbook (POH), is valid for operation at the gross weight stated, which is typically at max gross weight. It is especially important to note that VA decreases as the airplane weight decreases
USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AZFlyer
Hangar Talk
18
08-23-2009 07:27 PM
Dan64456
Technical
19
06-25-2009 10:25 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-10-2009 08:24 AM
wrxsteve
Hangar Talk
0
12-24-2008 11:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices