Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Rate/Radius of Turn

Old 02-08-2010, 07:14 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 32
Default Rate/Radius of Turn

While studying the FAA's Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical knowledge, I came across two concepts that I know to be true but I can't explain why.

1. Why does the Rate of turn decrease when airspeed increases?

2. Why does the Radius of turn increase when the airspeed increases?
gestrich19 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 08:55 AM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

You have to get into the math a little bit to understand this one, and it has to do with this equation. I put in some dots spacing.

R = V-squared.....
.....g * tan(theta)

where:

R= radius of turn
g= gravity
V= velocity of airplane (speed)
theta= bank angle (zero is no bank)

So, in a level turn weight must equal gravity, and bank angle is constant as well by definition, then what must happen to R with a change in speed (V)?
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:13 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post

So, in a level turn weight must equal gravity, and bank angle is constant
That's the constant - increase/decrease load factor and it changes.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:25 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Load factor (L/W) does change with speed in constant bank angle level turns, but it does not affect the turn radius, only speed does.

[edit] "shdw" points out in a later post (#22) that this statement was incorrect. Not sure what I was thinking...

Last edited by Cubdriver; 02-12-2010 at 11:22 AM. Reason: correction
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 12:49 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

I was under the impression that turn performance was based on radial acceleration (vector sum of load factor and gravity).
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:41 PM
  #6  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Practical Example

Gestrich19:

Here's a practical example for you, as this confused me in ground school, too.

Picture yourself walking down the street. You suddenly see a store you want to go into, and make a sharp turn and go inside.

Now, try doing the same thing, running as fast as you can.

Obviously, the radius is bigger for the runner, and he also takes longer to make the turn. That is radius and rate, respectively.

It confused me in ground school/early flying because I told myself: "But the faster I go, the more 'g' that can be generated!"

True, but it doesn't help. I had this discussion with a student recently, and I proved via the lift formula and turn radius formula that for the same angle of attack, the turn radius is a constant. But that is a different side to this discussion.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:47 PM
  #7  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Half-Right

Originally Posted by ryan1234 View Post
I was under the impression that turn performance was based on radial acceleration (vector sum of load factor and gravity).
Ryan:

The first part of your statement is correct: the horizontal component is what counts for turn performance (assuming you are making a horizontal turn, otherwise, a more general and correct statement would be the component in the direction of turn, such as in a loop, immelmann, split-S, pitchback, or sliceback).

But in the horizontal example, the total vector (or 'g'), which is what you feel, is not the horizontal component. Total is vector addition of horizontal and vertical components. So, your equation should say Load Factor = Horizontal + Vertical.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:58 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
Gestrich19:

Here's a practical example for you, as this confused me in ground school, too.

Picture yourself walking down the street. You suddenly see a store you want to go into, and make a sharp turn and go inside.

Now, try doing the same thing, running as fast as you can.

Obviously, the radius is bigger for the runner, and he also takes longer to make the turn. That is radius and rate, respectively.

It confused me in ground school/early flying because I told myself: "But the faster I go, the more 'g' that can be generated!"

True, but it doesn't help. I had this discussion with a student recently, and I proved via the lift formula and turn radius formula that for the same angle of attack, the turn radius is a constant. But that is a different side to this discussion.
But in the EM diagram there is that one point where turn rate and rdius is optimized - correct? Or have I been out of the loop too long?

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:58 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
But in the EM diagram there is that one point where turn rate and rdius is optimized - correct? Or have I been out of the loop too long?

USMCFLYR
Is that the corner speed?
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:03 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
Ryan:

The first part of your statement is correct: the horizontal component is what counts for turn performance (assuming you are making a horizontal turn, otherwise, a more general and correct statement would be the component in the direction of turn, such as in a loop, immelmann, split-S, pitchback, or sliceback).

But in the horizontal example, the total vector (or 'g'), which is what you feel, is not the horizontal component. Total is vector addition of horizontal and vertical components. So, your equation should say Load Factor = Horizontal + Vertical.
Ok... so does that mean that the vertical (over the top 'egg') will have a more positive turn performance while the horizontal will have more negative turn performance?
ryan1234 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EnglishmaninNY
Technical
12
01-16-2011 12:20 PM
DaRaiders
Cargo
2
01-29-2009 01:19 PM
Pecan
Cargo
0
01-06-2009 12:06 PM
USMCFLYR
Flight Schools and Training
19
09-07-2008 05:36 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
08-24-2008 12:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices