"It's funny, you read that entire post (maybe?) and got nothing out of it. You'll never get anything out of something if you approach it with this kind of attitude. Dismissive and pompous."

Sorry you feel that way, but I can understand why. My point is that what you are talking about is not new or unique in content, but it is in fact a distorted view of a few facts you have collected seemingly at random, and by stuffing a few facts into a whole bunch of verbosity that really doesn't have much to do with what we are discussing you now want to call it new or unique.

The last time we chatted you claimed to have developed a unique crosswind method for twin engine aircraft of all sizes. Despite Boeings recommendations to the contrary you wanted to encourage pilots to use this method at the risk of their lives, their passengers lives and their shiny new 200 million dollar jet. It didn't go over too well.

I am always ready to learn, but don't think you can urinate on my back and convince me it is raining.

Just a little tip, if you want to teach people something keep it short and simple. Your students will learn faster by doing than by mulling over pages of formulas.

How many students are you working with now? If a student disagrees with your opinion, do you call him dismissive and pompous or try to teach another way of looking at the situation?

 

I ain't gettin' into this one. I don't get paid enough, and all the retired military trainers are here anyway. Good luck, shadow.

 

I'm done here too.

 

US Air Force Instrument Training Manual.