Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Flight Schools and Training (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/flight-schools-training/)
-   -   Help with Prop Governor Theory (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/flight-schools-training/52999-help-prop-governor-theory.html)

Cruz5350 08-24-2010 12:05 PM

I had to split mine up. I used a Turbo 210 can you imagine doing commercial maneuvers in that thing!

the King 08-24-2010 01:26 PM

I initially assumed he already had a CMEL and was adding on the SE, in which case he could do it in the 172 as long as the DPE was willing (and they usually are).

A320fan 08-25-2010 07:24 PM

Nope, unfortunately I do not have any other ratings other than my PPL. We're 141, and I'm about to finish the COMM SEL training, then moving on to MEL training, taking the ride for our COMM/Instrument/Multi rating after that. Our school switched COMM SEL training to C172's to lower the cost when the FAA got rid of the reg requiring the training to be in a complex aircraft.

And just a side note: I'm going in for the oral tomorrow. Hitting the books hard tonight.

ryan1234 08-26-2010 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A320fan (Post 861039)
t. Our school switched COMM SEL training to C172's to lower the cost when the FAA got rid of the reg requiring the training to be in a complex aircraft.

They did!? Where have I been?

Cubdriver 08-26-2010 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryan1234 (Post 861182)
They did!? Where have I been?

Last summer I think, maybe even less time ago. Schools have been selling their Cessna 172RGs and other little retracts like hot potatoes. It was always a silly rule in my opinion having a separate aircraft just to show someone can swing a gear handle.

ryan1234 08-26-2010 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cubdriver (Post 861384)
Last summer I think, maybe even less time ago. Schools have been selling their Cessna 172RGs and other little retracts like hot potatoes. It was always a silly rule in my opinion having a separate aircraft just to show someone can swing a gear handle.

Wow!! Is that just a 141 thing.. or 61 also? Same for the CFI ride or no?

A320fan 08-26-2010 08:00 PM

I'm not too sure if it's just 141 or 61 too, but we're still doing our 141 CFI final checks in the Arrow. But there's only a few lessons in it though, maybe 5 or 6.

Av8nFL180nBelow 10-25-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A320fan (Post 861039)
Our school switched COMM SEL training to C172's to lower the cost when the FAA got rid of the reg requiring the training to be in a complex aircraft.

This was approved? Where does it say this? I cant find it anywhere in the regs. Still says under 141 and 61 that you are required to have the (ii) Ten hours of training in an airplane that has a retractable landing gear, flaps, and a controllable pitch propeller, or is turbine-powered.

I know last year I was reading the proposal to get rid of this requirement and substitute it for 10hrs of Advanced instrument training, but I haven't heard anything of it actually changing. I work for a large 141 school which will do ANYTHING to get rid of our RG, but we are still using it.

Av8nFL180nBelow 10-25-2010 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A320fan (Post 861039)
I'm about to finish the COMM SEL training, then moving on to MEL training, taking the ride for our COMM/Instrument/Multi rating after that.

Ok so after reading your post a little more, are you actually taking a SE Commercial check ride and receiving a certificate? or is your school going to be giving you a Multi commercial license, with a SE add on after you complete more training? If this is the case, then you never have to use a complex aircraft since it would be an add on, but this isn't a new rule.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 PM.
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands