Help with Prop Governor Theory
08-23-2010 | 02:38 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: C172 Right
Help with Prop Governor Theory
I'm getting ready for my COMM SEL ride, and feel pretty much ready for most of the oral except for 1 thing-Prop governors. First off, I'm taking the ride in a 172, but we still need to know landing gear, prop governor, and pressurization systems (and feel free to let me know if I missed anything else). What I get so far about governors is this: props change pitch by means of oil pressure through the governor. In a single-engine, increased pressure=higher pitch/low RPM and vice-versa for decreased pressure. But I don't know where to go from there as far as explaining it for the oral. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
08-23-2010 | 02:59 PM
#2
APC co-founder
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
There are tons of resources via google, do a quick search.
Here's one I found: AIRCRAFT PROPELLER CONTROL AND OPERATION
Know normal ops and failure modes along with immediate actions for your check ride (and when you're flying the plane too of course).
I've been out of GA for a while, but don't you have to take a Comm. check in a complex aircraft?
Here's one I found: AIRCRAFT PROPELLER CONTROL AND OPERATION
Know normal ops and failure modes along with immediate actions for your check ride (and when you're flying the plane too of course).
I've been out of GA for a while, but don't you have to take a Comm. check in a complex aircraft?
08-23-2010 | 03:05 PM
#3
Moderator
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
HSLD's explanations are nice, and I would get out the Jeppesson explanation, read it a few times, explain it to the wall without looking at the book to make sure you have it. The main thing is to know what it is going to do if you lose oil pressure (low pitch), know the basics of how it works (such as the flyweights, springs, oil path, etc.) and what the aerodynamic advantages are to having one (pitch matched to airspeed mainly) and some disadvantages as well such as higher drag idling in the flare, higher nose weight, higher mx cost, oil leakage, and slightly reduced glide ratio come to mind. I think it would be good to know why we cycle the prop during a run-up also.
08-23-2010 | 03:06 PM
#4
pants on the ground
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: back seat
http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/a...83-3a-5of7.pdf
ch 11-3
come back if this doesn't answer your questions?
ch 11-3
come back if this doesn't answer your questions?
08-23-2010 | 06:31 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
I'm getting ready for my COMM SEL ride, and feel pretty much ready for most of the oral except for 1 thing-Prop governors. First off, I'm taking the ride in a 172, but we still need to know landing gear, prop governor, and pressurization systems (and feel free to let me know if I missed anything else). What I get so far about governors is this: props change pitch by means of oil pressure through the governor. In a single-engine, increased pressure=higher pitch/low RPM and vice-versa for decreased pressure. But I don't know where to go from there as far as explaining it for the oral. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Pressurization... if it's like any other commercial ride, it's doubtful they'll ask you much about that. But it's always good to know to basics... like if you loose pressure really fast at altitude - it can be a precarious situation.
08-24-2010 | 02:33 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: 127.0.0.1
rusty
I think you can split the ride to save bucks. i.e. do most of the air work in a 172, then some pattern work in a complex to demonstrate the moving parts. I could be way off base, those brain cells are long gone.
08-24-2010 | 06:31 AM
#7
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,218
Likes: 819
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
You can split it up, DPE willing, but it adds time and complexity to the checkride as well as an extra pre-flight, taxi in/out, and another set of Mx logs to review. Seems to me the savings would not be worth it.
08-24-2010 | 06:58 AM
#8
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
I split up (used two aircraft) during my initial CFI checkride and I wouldn't do it again. It was a pain in the butt for me and the examiner, made a long checkride even longer and when it was all said and done I bet I didn't save much money.
08-24-2010 | 07:15 AM
#9
Moderator
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
The (only) time when splitting up the aircraft used for the CFI ride is advantageous may be when the checkride is ended early due to weather, exam failure, or some other problem and it has to be continued.
08-24-2010 | 10:26 AM
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
