Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Type rating...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2017, 11:41 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Default Type rating...?

As I look to transition from the Air Force to the airlines in the next couple years, is it a significant boost to my application if I were to have a type rating in the aircraft flown by the carrier I'd like to be hired by? ...or is the juice not worth the squeeze in the time and money invested to get the type rating? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
onbelay02 is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 12:33 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

SWA will give you bonus points for a 73 type.

But some other carriers in the past did NOT want to see a 73 type without operating experience because it meant you were gunning for SWA. That may no longer be an issue with demographics the way they are.

As far as other types, it wouldn't hurt but probably not worth the money, unless you need to get current & ATP and have the GI Bill. New hire aircraft assignments would be based on seniority, not relevant experience.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 06:48 AM
  #3  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post

But some other carriers in the past did NOT want to see a 73 type without operating experience because it meant you were gunning for SWA.
I've read plenty elsewhere that this was more of an urban legend than anything backed up with solid facts. I know plenty of guys with a 737 type that were hired in the 1990s by a non-SWA carrier.

Not that it really matters anymore...
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 09:10 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 703
Default

Are you current in something significantly bigger than a 172? Do you have an ATP already?

If yes to both, I wouldn't bother. If no to both, you might as well go regional to get current and get paid to get your ATP.

If you are current, don't have an ATP and really want SWA then perhaps the extra $3-4k for the checkmark would be worth it. The 737 Classic type is about the only one out there possibly worth getting though.

In my case the type was absolutely worth it. I was semi-current and got my ATP/type when SWA still required it. Also, UAL did sim interviews in a Classic, which made it a low stress event for me. But, today I'd probably go right to a regional. Good luck.
CLazarus is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 02:28 PM
  #5  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
I've read plenty elsewhere that this was more of an urban legend than anything backed up with solid facts. I know plenty of guys with a 737 type that were hired in the 1990s by a non-SWA carrier.

Not that it really matters anymore...
Both UA and DL have a question on ther app: Do you have a 737 type rating?

They don't ask about airbus, MD, or any other boeing. Must have been a reason for that.

I believe it is irrelevant today, since nobody would leave a legacy for SWA anymore.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-04-2017, 07:54 AM
  #6  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I believe it is irrelevant today, since nobody would leave a legacy for SWA anymore.
Agree.
Plus, a friend told me new SWAPA email says 100 SWA pilots quit last year to go elsewhere.

How times change.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dapper993
Part 91 and Low Time
1
07-13-2013 11:47 AM
Axfriend
Corporate
19
06-10-2013 08:20 AM
tankerdude
Military
49
06-07-2013 08:34 AM
minority561
Flight Schools and Training
11
04-27-2010 03:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices