Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Foreign (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/foreign/)
-   -   Cathay SO paperwork (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/foreign/84932-cathay-so-paperwork.html)

ConfigOK 11-12-2014 03:50 AM

Cathay SO paperwork
 
Received an email this morning to fill out a medical and flight time summary for their second officer recruitment. Anyone know how many people they are looking for, competitive flight time, time to a U.S. base, etc?

Beaver Hunter 11-12-2014 04:31 AM

There are no US bases for SO's. I will also add that at this time there are extremely limited opportunities for US bases for FO and Capt. Be very careful with the information CX provides you with.

murkdaddy 11-12-2014 07:25 AM

Cathay is not the airline it use to be as far as a "career" airline for US pilots. Do a google search and you will find a ton of information on their new SO program. You will be Hong Kong based without a housing allowance which makes life miserable since rent is so high.

Murkdaddy

jackcarls0n 11-12-2014 08:40 AM

Cathay SO paperwork
 
I was lucky enough to get an interview. and the recruiter said one is an SO for seven years and hardly gets to fly the plane at al wxcept the sims. but living in hong kong with the pay they have is pretty much the same as being a 2nd year fo at a regional here in the States.
But its a good career move coz you will /might become an FO faster and then its all better.

And last I checked for the SO program they were only hiring HK permanent residents.

threeighteen 11-12-2014 01:06 PM

With the way HKG is being overrun by the PRC, do you really want to invest in a career there?

PCLCREW 11-14-2014 02:23 AM

I was waste deep in the Cathay hiring process a couple of years ago. With the current pay rates you will be living in a slum in Kowloon, and get to watch the FOs head to the Mid-Levels to their nice apartment. Pay is almost unlivable in HK.
5-7 years as a SO
No US bases, and even when you move to FO it could be years before you see a US base (if they're still around).

What once looked like a very good career airline is no more, do your homework and look at prices.
HK is not a place that you want to live in a bad area, but on the pay you can't afford anything else.

outaluckagain 11-14-2014 04:19 PM

Why?
 

Originally Posted by murkdaddy (Post 1762259)
Cathay is not the airline it use to be as far as a "career" airline for US pilots. Do a google search and you will find a ton of information on their new SO program. You will be Hong Kong based without a housing allowance which makes life miserable since rent is so high.

Murkdaddy

Why do you want to work for such low wages, and assume so much debt? That company wants you to agree to stay for 6 years, or have to pay back a huge loan they give you for repeating the ratings that you have already earned.

ConfigOK 11-15-2014 05:54 AM

Thanks for all the info, I think I'm going to skip Cathay

4runner 11-22-2014 02:51 PM

I posted this on another professional pilot website, but I fly with a really good chap who has South African and UK citizenship. Did a stint with Cathay.

I asked him "So, how was Cathay"

He replies "Errrrrrrrr(pause), if I were in Flt Ops and conducted interviews, my only two questions would be 1. Are you from Oz
2. Are you from NZ

PotatoChip 11-22-2014 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by 4runner (Post 1769018)
I posted this on another professional pilot website, but I fly with a really good chap who has South African and UK citizenship. Did a stint with Cathay.

I asked him "So, how was Cathay"

He replies "Errrrrrrrr(pause), if I were in Flt Ops and conducted interviews, my only two questions would be 1. Are you from Oz
2. Are you from NZ

From my experience, absolutely true. Oz looks after Oz, period.
Hard pressed to hear an American accent with a Cathay call sign.

marcal 11-22-2014 05:37 PM

Hard pressed? If you hear a CX jet in North America I'd say there is a 90% chance if not greater there are "yanks" on board. Approx 250 Americans at CX the majority of whom are us based.

PotatoChip 11-22-2014 09:27 PM


Originally Posted by marcal (Post 1769116)
Hard pressed? If you hear a CX jet in North America I'd say there is a 90% chance if not greater there are "yanks" on board. Approx 250 Americans at CX the majority of whom are us based.

Fair enough. I must be flying the opposite routes! Just my experience. I also know about 10 ex-Cathay guys, none of whom are Americans (Aussies and Canadians, eh?).

Do they ever hire US based guys anymore? I've been hearing it's all going to this SO route...

Beaver Hunter 11-22-2014 10:43 PM

Stay away! You will be glad you did. Lots of promises and little delivery. Always eroding your cos.

PotatoChip 11-22-2014 11:10 PM


Originally Posted by Beaver Hunter (Post 1769274)
Lots of promises and little delivery.

This could describe any airline. That said, the boys over on PPrune sound mighty unhappy at the moment. And I've spoken with plenty of 49ers.

murkdaddy 11-23-2014 05:04 PM

The problem with pprune is everyone is unhappy all the time so it is hard to gauge an airline from that forum haha

They have only been hiring SO's for a few years now, SO's are only Hong Kong based, and it doesn't sound like the FO window will open up any time in the foreseeable future.

Murkdaddy

marcal 11-23-2014 06:51 PM

CX is nowhere near as bad as PPRUNE would make it seem, however there are many things that make it substantially different from a US carrier. I spent 7 years there and recently left for a US legacy. Not many do that b/c ultimately it is a place that you can stay for a career but there are many, many other options out there.

CX seemed to be a phenomenal place to go when US legacies were not hiring or furloughing, but when the US is hiring, there really is nowhere better in the world.

I didn't see a future for my family in HKG and my family lives in the most junior base of my new carrier, so the timing worked out.

I would have stayed at CX indefinitely had I not gotten on at my present carrier.

outaluckagain 11-24-2014 12:06 PM


Originally Posted by marcal (Post 1769843)
CX is nowhere near as bad as PPRUNE would make it seem, however there are many things that make it substantially different from a US carrier. I spent 7 years there and recently left for a US legacy. Not many do that b/c ultimately it is a place that you can stay for a career but there are many, many other options out there.

CX seemed to be a phenomenal place to go when US legacies were not hiring or furloughing, but when the US is hiring, there really is nowhere better in the world.

I didn't see a future for my family in HKG and my family lives in the most junior base of my new carrier, so the timing worked out.

I would have stayed at CX indefinitely had I not gotten on at my present carrier.

I agree with you that those guys at PPRUNE over exagerate their delimna at CX. They really come off a little screwy at times, but I do get their point. Look elsewhere, and don't make CX a first choice by any means. Consider holding out until they hire DEFO.

I personally may consider a SO position in a year or so, but I will not go for that lousy cadet scheme. The 6 year commitment is absurd, and the forgiveable loan is even worse.

By the way, didn't they increase the housing allowance recently?

GreenTailWhale 11-24-2014 01:30 PM

I believe the second largest group (Oz the largest) of pilot numbers at CX are Canadian, so plenty of North American accents at the airline. A large majority of the North American based skippers are in point of fact, Canadian.

Papoo 11-24-2014 04:37 PM

A little from the horses mouth, having been there for 4 years... And I apologise to th chap that PM'd me for details, I've only just seen it. Hopefully this answers the questions you asked...

As an SO, you won't get to fly the aircraft, only a sim every 6 weeks or so.

Seven years is nonsense. Currently, the FO upgrade is 2 years and 9 months. It fluctuates, of course. 2.75-3.25 being the historic standard deviation.

Aus and UK are the two largest pilot nationalities, with Canadians not far behind. Then there is a smattering of commonwealth pilots from SA, NZ, Continental Europe, etc. and a handful of Americans. Most Yanks are already based in the US, there are only a few who are HKG based. I'd say the flight deck diversity is one of the pros of working here. Makes for good conversation, too.

Now, the biggie; pay.

If you join with an ATP, you'll be given around HK$820,000, which is just shy of US$110,000.

It's yours to do as you wish, but that is the 'bond', which is prorated over 6 years. So, if you leave after 3, you'll owe $410,000.

As for salary, the following are about what my numbers come out with, and comprise of basic salary, flight duty pay (about 10% of your basic, if you work a normal month) and your HK Allowance, currently HK$1000 a month.

As a year one SO, averaged over the year, and including per diem, you'll get $58,000 (US$7500) a month. This also assumes a 13th month payment, which is customary in HK. Without it, subtract about 3000 ($400) from that figure. The SO pay increments are about 10% a year.

I include per diem, as I believe it's usually included on your payslip in he US, whereas we get a cash allowance at the hotel. If you don't wish to include it, take away around 5000 from the monthly figure.

As a fresh junior FO, (call that around 3 years) you'll get around $75000 a month (US$9650).

Within a year of being a Junior FO, you sit another check, which qualifies you as a 'fully-fledged' FO. This is the biggest hike in pay, as the basic jumps up a good notch, and your HK allowance goes from 10,000 to 14,000.

Using the same composition (basic, duty, HK allowance, 13th month and per diem), your monthly average will be around $105,000 (US$13,700).

After that, your basic goes up a few percent per year, and your HK goes to $18,000 after 4 years as an FO.

FYI CX pay 15% of your basic plus duty pay into your retirement fund. You choose whether to contribute 0, 5 or 10% on top.

As your rent is tax deductible, expect your total HK tax bill to be 10-12%, all in. There is a wacky provisional tax scheme here, but that's another discussion.

So, that's the crux of the pay. I'm not claiming them to be 100% accurate for everyone, but they corroborate with my figures, and I've worked a pretty standard roster my whole time here, ie. not dropping trips, and not counting overtime - which is lucrative, but unpredictable.

It sounds like a lot, and it certainly is. Comparing it in any way to US regional pay is absurd. You can only compare it to the majors, as you're flying major metal for a legacy airline. BUT, and it's a big but, the elephant in the room is the cost of housing here. Particularly if you come from the US, as opposed to London or Melbourne.

In my case, I'm now earning what I'd make as a senior 777FO in the states, and it's only taken me 4 years. Great, but it's whether or not if can make my situation work favourably when all else is considered.

If you keep your housing bill sensible, the money provides for a great lifestyle. SO's typically take holidays around Asia etc every month. HK has a great social and restaurant scene, and all your mates live nearby. All of this adds up, of course. But, if your rent is reasonable, you can still take advantage here.

In terms of rent, a 700s/f place in the mid levels will set you back US$2500 a month, minimum. That same place a bit further out, around US$1,600. So, the maths is easy enough to do to see what you'll have left over as discretionary cash. But, the issue we face, is that in order to live in a place where you'd be happy raising a family of 4, you'd have nothing left. Once you break into the 3/4 bed, 1600s/f market, you're looking at 4.5-8k, depending on location.

As most SO's are younger, and without kids, lifestyle is great, as you can cut back on rent or share with a mate. As a long term proposition, using the assumption that most people want a wife and kids at some point, then something's got to give. I believe that this is the bone of contention here - not so much the 'now', but the viability of raising a family here.

The company, I'm sure, are playing a balancing act regarding the HK allowance - in order to give just enough to attract guys, and to stem the attrition. They wanted to put it up (presumably because they require a fair bit of recruitment in the near future) in the last pay TA (only by a couple of grand), but the Union quite rightly wanted it to be kept separate from pay. I'd expect to see a modest increase in it, though.

As for the money, I hope that's been of use. In summary, the money is good. Until you need an apartment fit for a family. Then it becomes unviable. So, place your bets. The company won't want everyone to leave when they hit child-bearing circumstances, but they also don't want to pay the expat housing allowance....

If you're interested in the other stuff;

Rosters - totally fleet specific. In fact, being on the 777 is like being in a different company to the A330/340 fleet. However, as an SO, you're only doing long haul, which limits the rostering damage.

On the 777, I did 2 or 3 ULH a month. 18-23 days off every month. No complaints. As an FO, I'm now a bit busier, but not massively. On the A330, SO's work a fair bit harder. The main gripe, I think, is that there is very little control of your roster. This has a bigger impact on the Airbus than the 777, but we're all agreed on the point. There is talk of implementing a 'real' system, but currently, we're lucky to get more than one of our requests a month. We don't have the 'soft' benefits that come with your complex rostering language. 90%+ of our pay is salaried/guaranteed rather than hourly, so I'm sure the company aren't keen on providing us too much flexibility in that regard.

As for basings...

There have been a decent number of London bases open up in the last year. LAX and SFO have small numbers open now. Bette than nothing, although the company have said they intend to open an NY base. That will be a couple of hundred guys, given how many flights we operate there. I'm not sure how many Americans we have in HKG, but I'm not sure if it's enough to fill such a big base, assuming they'd all bid for it in the first place.

Would that lead to DEFO on the base? Who knows. My guess would be probably.

Would I recommend it?

I'd say it depends. I thoroughly enjoy it here. I love living in HK. I enjoy going to work, and I have many great friends here. Housing aside, I enjoy a far higher standard of living here than I did on $100,000 in the US. My job is about the most secure in the industry, and the flying is to a great mix of long haul and regional destinations. But, it's horses for courses. What I see as pros may not feature on your priority list.

If you are single or married without kids, it's great. If you have kids, I'd think very hard. I know it is a deal-breaker for many. You may be OK when you're halfway up the FO list on 15 grand a month, but as an SO, I believe it would be nigh-on impossible to view favourably against earning similar money in the US. That being said, as a regional pilot, you're earning atrocious money - whereby a raising a family is a huge financial strain, no doubt.

Then again, living in HK is not for many folks, regardless of what they are paid.

Whether or not you would join CX on the premise of getting a base later; I'd say that's probably pretty brave. Timing is everything, and it may work out for you in the near future, but like everything in aviation, anything beyond the near future is pure guesswork.

I hope that's provided a balanced viewpoint. I'm happy to answer any of your questions, so fire away.

Papoo 11-24-2014 05:25 PM

Further to add below the paragraph starting "as for the money..."


Who knows what/how the company will think, when large numbers of Cadet SOs have upgraded and have a couple of years of P1 time on 777s and A330/350s, who perhaps don't see a long term future in the company. At this juncture, the first few batches of Cadet SOs have upgraded, but don't have a great deal of FO time yet. There aren't large swathes of newly minted FOs coming through yet. However, the recruitment bulge of 2012/2013 will see large numbers of fresh FOs come to 'marketability' in a year or so. If/when they start leaving, perhaps we can expect to see a change to our conditions. I don't see much happening in the interim - the company and the SOs know that you're not particularly marketable without a couple of years as an FO.
That hen has not yet come home to roost.

Also, my figure of $75,000 for a fresh FO didn't include the amortised 13th month. In which case it should be $80,000 (US$10,300).

outaluckagain 11-24-2014 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by Papoo (Post 1770463)
A little from the horses mouth, having been there for 4 years... And I apologise to th chap that PM'd me for details, I've only just seen it. Hopefully this answers the questions you asked...

As an SO, you won't get to fly the aircraft, only a sim every 6 weeks or so.

Seven years is nonsense. Currently, the FO upgrade is 2 years and 9 months. It fluctuates, of course. 2.75-3.25 being the historic standard deviation.

Aus and UK are the two largest pilot nationalities, with Canadians not far behind. Then there is a smattering of commonwealth pilots from SA, NZ, Continental Europe, etc. and a handful of Americans. Most Yanks are already based in the US, there are only a few who are HKG based. I'd say the flight deck diversity is one of the pros of working here. Makes for good conversation, too.

Now, the biggie; pay.

If you join with an ATP, you'll be given around HK$820,000, which is just shy of US$110,000.

It's yours to do as you wish, but that is the 'bond', which is prorated over 6 years. So, if you leave after 3, you'll owe $410,000.

As for salary, the following are about what my numbers come out with, and comprise of basic salary, flight duty pay (about 10% of your basic, if you work a normal month) and your HK Allowance, currently HK$1000 a month.

As a year one SO, averaged over the year, and including per diem, you'll get $58,000 (US$7500) a month. This also assumes a 13th month payment, which is customary in HK. Without it, subtract about 3000 ($400) from that figure. The SO pay increments are about 10% a year.

I include per diem, as I believe it's usually included on your payslip in he US, whereas we get a cash allowance at the hotel. If you don't wish to include it, take away around 5000 from the monthly figure.

As a fresh junior FO, (call that around 3 years) you'll get around $75000 a month (US$9650).

Within a year of being a Junior FO, you sit another check, which qualifies you as a 'fully-fledged' FO. This is the biggest hike in pay, as the basic jumps up a good notch, and your HK allowance goes from 10,000 to 14,000.

Using the same composition (basic, duty, HK allowance, 13th month and per diem), your monthly average will be around $105,000 (US$13,700).

After that, your basic goes up a few percent per year, and your HK goes to $18,000 after 4 years as an FO.

FYI CX pay 15% of your basic plus duty pay into your retirement fund. You choose whether to contribute 0, 5 or 10% on top.

As your rent is tax deductible, expect your total HK tax bill to be 10-12%, all in. There is a wacky provisional tax scheme here, but that's another discussion.

So, that's the crux of the pay. I'm not claiming them to be 100% accurate for everyone, but they corroborate with my figures, and I've worked a pretty standard roster my whole time here, ie. not dropping trips, and not counting overtime - which is lucrative, but unpredictable.

It sounds like a lot, and it certainly is. Comparing it in any way to US regional pay is absurd. You can only compare it to the majors, as you're flying major metal for a legacy airline. BUT, and it's a big but, the elephant in the room is the cost of housing here. Particularly if you come from the US, as opposed to London or Melbourne.

In my case, I'm now earning what I'd make as a senior 777FO in the states, and it's only taken me 4 years. Great, but it's whether or not if can make my situation work favourably when all else is considered.

If you keep your housing bill sensible, the money provides for a great lifestyle. SO's typically take holidays around Asia etc every month. HK has a great social and restaurant scene, and all your mates live nearby. All of this adds up, of course. But, if your rent is reasonable, you can still take advantage here.

In terms of rent, a 700s/f place in the mid levels will set you back US$2500 a month, minimum. That same place a bit further out, around US$1,600. So, the maths is easy enough to do to see what you'll have left over as discretionary cash. But, the issue we face, is that in order to live in a place where you'd be happy raising a family of 4, you'd have nothing left. Once you break into the 3/4 bed, 1600s/f market, you're looking at 4.5-8k, depending on location.

As most SO's are younger, and without kids, lifestyle is great, as you can cut back on rent or share with a mate. As a long term proposition, using the assumption that most people want a wife and kids at some point, then something's got to give. I believe that this is the bone of contention here - not so much the 'now', but the viability of raising a family here.

The company, I'm sure, are playing a balancing act regarding the HK allowance - in order to give just enough to attract guys, and to stem the attrition. They wanted to put it up (presumably because they require a fair bit of recruitment in the near future) in the last pay TA (only by a couple of grand), but the Union quite rightly wanted it to be kept separate from pay. I'd expect to see a modest increase in it, though.

As for the money, I hope that's been of use. In summary, the money is good. Until you need an apartment fit for a family. Then it becomes unviable. So, place your bets. The company won't want everyone to leave when they hit child-bearing circumstances, but they also don't want to pay the expat housing allowance....

If you're interested in the other stuff;

Rosters - totally fleet specific. In fact, being on the 777 is like being in a different company to the A330/340 fleet. However, as an SO, you're only doing long haul, which limits the rostering damage.

On the 777, I did 2 or 3 ULH a month. 18-23 days off every month. No complaints. As an FO, I'm now a bit busier, but not massively. On the A330, SO's work a fair bit harder. The main gripe, I think, is that there is very little control of your roster. This has a bigger impact on the Airbus than the 777, but we're all agreed on the point. There is talk of implementing a 'real' system, but currently, we're lucky to get more than one of our requests a month. We don't have the 'soft' benefits that come with your complex rostering language. 90%+ of our pay is salaried/guaranteed rather than hourly, so I'm sure the company aren't keen on providing us too much flexibility in that regard.

As for basings...

There have been a decent number of London bases open up in the last year. LAX and SFO have small numbers open now. Bette than nothing, although the company have said they intend to open an NY base. That will be a couple of hundred guys, given how many flights we operate there. I'm not sure how many Americans we have in HKG, but I'm not sure if it's enough to fill such a big base, assuming they'd all bid for it in the first place.

Would that lead to DEFO on the base? Who knows. My guess would be probably.

Would I recommend it?

I'd say it depends. I thoroughly enjoy it here. I love living in HK. I enjoy going to work, and I have many great friends here. Housing aside, I enjoy a far higher standard of living here than I did on $100,000 in the US. My job is about the most secure in the industry, and the flying is to a great mix of long haul and regional destinations. But, it's horses for courses. What I see as pros may not feature on your priority list.

If you are single or married without kids, it's great. If you have kids, I'd think very hard. I know it is a deal-breaker for many. You may be OK when you're halfway up the FO list on 15 grand a month, but as an SO, I believe it would be nigh-on impossible to view favourably against earning similar money in the US. That being said, as a regional pilot, you're earning atrocious money - whereby a raising a family is a huge financial strain, no doubt.

Then again, living in HK is not for many folks, regardless of what they are paid.

Whether or not you would join CX on the premise of getting a base later; I'd say that's probably pretty brave. Timing is everything, and it may work out for you in the near future, but like everything in aviation, anything beyond the near future is pure guesswork.

I hope that's provided a balanced viewpoint. I'm happy to answer any of your questions, so fire away.

OK, I see the HK pilot allownace did not go up..stil at 10K.
Age limit to join? I am 45 and getting ready to go to apply at the regionals. Got the 4 year degree and good work history.

I am thinking CX would probably take me, but not sure because of my age being so high.

Either way, like in said in my previous post, I will not go for that cadet program. Just no reason to start in Adelaide flying GA aircraft all over again.

PotatoChip 11-24-2014 05:30 PM

Great post! Thank you for taking the time to write it, very informative and balanced.

I'm holding out for a DEFO JFK base, otherwise happily staying put.
Best of luck to you in HK.

bedrock 11-24-2014 05:47 PM

How much to rent a 3-4 bedroom island house in Tung Chung or Mui Wo?

US citizens who fly into the US may face taxation. I think you have to be out of the country 330 days a yr to avoid US taxes, and then you are still taxed above about 90K.

Papoo 11-24-2014 06:23 PM


Originally Posted by outaluckagain (Post 1770483)
OK, I see the HK pilot allownace did not go up..stil at 10K.
Age limit to join? I am 45 and getting ready to go to apply at the regionals. Got the 4 year degree and good work history.

I am thinking CX would probably take me, but not sure because of my age being so high.

Either way, like in said in my previous post, I will not go for that cadet program. Just no reason to start in Adelaide flying GA aircraft all over again.

Correct, it is still at 10k. They tried to nudge it up to 12/16 instead of 10/14, but the union insisted HKPA be kept separate from the pay negotiations. I would suggest it's fair to assume a similar increase to happen soon, though.

I think you misunderstand the 'Cadet' title. Cadet just means locally employed, as opposed to on full expat conditions. Perhaps not th best use of the word for guys joining with experience.If you have an ATP, you'll be in Adelaide for 2-3 months. Just pass the exams and a check ride. If you have nothing, you'll be there for 14 months. If you have less than 1500 but more than 350 (I think), you're there for 6.5 months.

As for whether or not they'll take you, it is much more aptitude and interview based than HR. I don't know whether your age will count against you, but I know they've hired guys in their late 30s.

Potatochip - cheers, and the same to you. It's my opinion, but I see DEFO hiring in the US. There just aren't the number of Americans based in HK to fill the demand that I foresee. I think the US is the only base location which has any real potential for new joiners, but I think it has it in spades.

Previous DEFO hiring has attracted guys with high experience, because the US was so stagnant. They were similar to today's Major requirements (8k, a few years TPIC) Now, with the majors hiring, perhaps guys will stand a better chance with a bit less time.

Bedrock - yes, US guys are subject to some fairly unique taxation issues. I don't want to give any advice, other than your 330 requirement won't be relevant, as if you actually lived in HK, a different 'means test' is used to qualify you as living abroad. Which, as you point out, means you're taxable on what you make above around US$100,000.

Tung Chung has actually gone up a lot in the last couple of years, due to the Macau bridge and a couple of local things. So, to me, it's not a great option, as I find it just a bit rubbish.

Mui Wo, a 3 bed, 2 storey place (likely to be the top two floors of a 3 storey village house) would start somewhere around 16k, and go up to 25, depending on location and quality. I'm a fan of Mui Wo.

For the whole house 3 floors, 2100" plus a 700" rooftop, start looking around 30 and up.

Drofdeb 11-25-2014 05:18 PM


Originally Posted by bedrock (Post 1770497)
How much to rent a 3-4 bedroom island house in Tung Chung or Mui Wo?

US citizens who fly into the US may face taxation. I think you have to be out of the country 330 days a yr to avoid US taxes, and then you are still taxed above about 90K.

IIRC the new figure (above which you are taxed if you are a US citizen) is 104K.
Please consult the IRS website/your accountant to make sure that information is correct.

PCLCREW 12-09-2014 02:06 PM



Originally Posted by Papoo (Post 1770463)
A little from the horses mouth, having been there for 4 years... And I apologise to th chap that PM'd me for details, I've only just seen it. Hopefully this answers the questions you asked...

As an SO, you won't get to fly the aircraft, only a sim every 6 weeks or so.

Seven years is nonsense. Currently, the FO upgrade is 2 years and 9 months. It fluctuates, of course. 2.75-3.25 being the historic standard deviation.

Aus and UK are the two largest pilot nationalities, with Canadians not far behind. Then there is a smattering of commonwealth pilots from SA, NZ, Continental Europe, etc. and a handful of Americans. Most Yanks are already based in the US, there are only a few who are HKG based. I'd say the flight deck diversity is one of the pros of working here. Makes for good conversation, too.

Now, the biggie; pay.

If you join with an ATP, you'll be given around HK$820,000, which is just shy of US$110,000.

It's yours to do as you wish, but that is the 'bond', which is prorated over 6 years. So, if you leave after 3, you'll owe $410,000.

As for salary, the following are about what my numbers come out with, and comprise of basic salary, flight duty pay (about 10% of your basic, if you work a normal month) and your HK Allowance, currently HK$1000 a month.

As a year one SO, averaged over the year, and including per diem, you'll get $58,000 (US$7500) a month. This also assumes a 13th month payment, which is customary in HK. Without it, subtract about 3000 ($400) from that figure. The SO pay increments are about 10% a year.

I include per diem, as I believe it's usually included on your payslip in he US, whereas we get a cash allowance at the hotel. If you don't wish to include it, take away around 5000 from the monthly figure.

As a fresh junior FO, (call that around 3 years) you'll get around $75000 a month (US$9650).

Within a year of being a Junior FO, you sit another check, which qualifies you as a 'fully-fledged' FO. This is the biggest hike in pay, as the basic jumps up a good notch, and your HK allowance goes from 10,000 to 14,000.

Using the same composition (basic, duty, HK allowance, 13th month and per diem), your monthly average will be around $105,000 (US$13,700).

After that, your basic goes up a few percent per year, and your HK goes to $18,000 after 4 years as an FO.

FYI CX pay 15% of your basic plus duty pay into your retirement fund. You choose whether to contribute 0, 5 or 10% on top.

As your rent is tax deductible, expect your total HK tax bill to be 10-12%, all in. There is a wacky provisional tax scheme here, but that's another discussion.

So, that's the crux of the pay. I'm not claiming them to be 100% accurate for everyone, but they corroborate with my figures, and I've worked a pretty standard roster my whole time here, ie. not dropping trips, and not counting overtime - which is lucrative, but unpredictable.

It sounds like a lot, and it certainly is. Comparing it in any way to US regional pay is absurd. You can only compare it to the majors, as you're flying major metal for a legacy airline. BUT, and it's a big but, the elephant in the room is the cost of housing here. Particularly if you come from the US, as opposed to London or Melbourne.

In my case, I'm now earning what I'd make as a senior 777FO in the states, and it's only taken me 4 years. Great, but it's whether or not if can make my situation work favourably when all else is considered.

If you keep your housing bill sensible, the money provides for a great lifestyle. SO's typically take holidays around Asia etc every month. HK has a great social and restaurant scene, and all your mates live nearby. All of this adds up, of course. But, if your rent is reasonable, you can still take advantage here.

In terms of rent, a 700s/f place in the mid levels will set you back US$2500 a month, minimum. That same place a bit further out, around US$1,600. So, the maths is easy enough to do to see what you'll have left over as discretionary cash. But, the issue we face, is that in order to live in a place where you'd be happy raising a family of 4, you'd have nothing left. Once you break into the 3/4 bed, 1600s/f market, you're looking at 4.5-8k, depending on location.

As most SO's are younger, and without kids, lifestyle is great, as you can cut back on rent or share with a mate. As a long term proposition, using the assumption that most people want a wife and kids at some point, then something's got to give. I believe that this is the bone of contention here - not so much the 'now', but the viability of raising a family here.

The company, I'm sure, are playing a balancing act regarding the HK allowance - in order to give just enough to attract guys, and to stem the attrition. They wanted to put it up (presumably because they require a fair bit of recruitment in the near future) in the last pay TA (only by a couple of grand), but the Union quite rightly wanted it to be kept separate from pay. I'd expect to see a modest increase in it, though.

As for the money, I hope that's been of use. In summary, the money is good. Until you need an apartment fit for a family. Then it becomes unviable. So, place your bets. The company won't want everyone to leave when they hit child-bearing circumstances, but they also don't want to pay the expat housing allowance....

If you're interested in the other stuff;

Rosters - totally fleet specific. In fact, being on the 777 is like being in a different company to the A330/340 fleet. However, as an SO, you're only doing long haul, which limits the rostering damage.

On the 777, I did 2 or 3 ULH a month. 18-23 days off every month. No complaints. As an FO, I'm now a bit busier, but not massively. On the A330, SO's work a fair bit harder. The main gripe, I think, is that there is very little control of your roster. This has a bigger impact on the Airbus than the 777, but we're all agreed on the point. There is talk of implementing a 'real' system, but currently, we're lucky to get more than one of our requests a month. We don't have the 'soft' benefits that come with your complex rostering language. 90%+ of our pay is salaried/guaranteed rather than hourly, so I'm sure the company aren't keen on providing us too much flexibility in that regard.

As for basings...

There have been a decent number of London bases open up in the last year. LAX and SFO have small numbers open now. Bette than nothing, although the company have said they intend to open an NY base. That will be a couple of hundred guys, given how many flights we operate there. I'm not sure how many Americans we have in HKG, but I'm not sure if it's enough to fill such a big base, assuming they'd all bid for it in the first place.

Would that lead to DEFO on the base? Who knows. My guess would be probably.

Would I recommend it?

I'd say it depends. I thoroughly enjoy it here. I love living in HK. I enjoy going to work, and I have many great friends here. Housing aside, I enjoy a far higher standard of living here than I did on $100,000 in the US. My job is about the most secure in the industry, and the flying is to a great mix of long haul and regional destinations. But, it's horses for courses. What I see as pros may not feature on your priority list.

If you are single or married without kids, it's great. If you have kids, I'd think very hard. I know it is a deal-breaker for many. You may be OK when you're halfway up the FO list on 15 grand a month, but as an SO, I believe it would be nigh-on impossible to view favourably against earning similar money in the US. That being said, as a regional pilot, you're earning atrocious money - whereby a raising a family is a huge financial strain, no doubt.

Then again, living in HK is not for many folks, regardless of what they are paid.

Whether or not you would join CX on the premise of getting a base later; I'd say that's probably pretty brave. Timing is everything, and it may work out for you in the near future, but like everything in aviation, anything beyond the near future is pure guesswork.

I hope that's provided a balanced viewpoint. I'm happy to answer any of your questions, so fire away.

OK, I see the HK pilot allownace did not go up..stil at 10K.
Age limit to join? I am 45 and getting ready to go to apply at the regionals. Got the 4 year degree and good work history.

I am thinking CX would probably take me, but not sure because of my age being so high.

Either way, like in said in my previous post, I will not go for that cadet program. Just no reason to start in Adelaide flying GA aircraft all over again.
You age could be a problem.

Your spending time in Adelaide no matter what.

Never say Cathay will take you, it's one of the hardest interviews to pass.

Sike 12-10-2014 11:23 PM

As a CX Yank, I'd say you'd have to be nuts to join at this point. Six to ten years ago, when no one else was hiring, it was a pretty good deal. If you look at current wages on comparable aircraft at the U.S. legacy carriers, we're about 15% underpaid. Not to mention that on a base, it's probably the least satisfying aviation job there is, if you actually enjoy flying. The time off and "golden handcuffs" are about all that keep me here now.

On the flip side, if you're under 24 years old and have little to no flying experience, it might be an option. If you want a "free" education and have an interest in seeing the world at a young age, I think it could be fun. You could always return home after six years with widebody international experience. Although I'm not really sure how many U.S. legacies are hiring without the coveted 1000 PIC turbojet. In other countries, (read UK and AUS) I don't think that's so much of an issue.

outaluckagain 12-12-2014 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by Sike (Post 1780786)
As a CX Yank, I'd say you'd have to be nuts to join at this point. Six to ten years ago, when no one else was hiring, it was a pretty good deal. If you look at current wages on comparable aircraft at the U.S. legacy carriers, we're about 15% underpaid. Not to mention that on a base, it's probably the least satisfying aviation job there is, if you actually enjoy flying. The time off and "golden handcuffs" are about all that keep me here now.

On the flip side, if you're under 24 years old and have little to no flying experience, it might be an option. If you want a "free" education and have an interest in seeing the world at a young age, I think it could be fun. You could always return home after six years with widebody international experience. Although I'm not really sure how many U.S. legacies are hiring without the coveted 1000 PIC turbojet. In other countries, (read UK and AUS) I don't think that's so much of an issue.

What is being said is still far superior to what I may expect to earn in the US. First 3 years at a regional, then finally a start at a major US airline.

The biggest short coming at CX is obviously the social and family aspect. Really not a good idea to start a family living in HK.

I have checked things out and weighed one against the other. The money will be better at CX since the oppertunity to make real pay will come sooner than it would at a US regional. Not saying CX pays better than a US major....Just that it will take at least 3 years before I may expect to get hired at a US major.

All all in all, I will stick to the US regional to US major route, because of the downside of living in HK and the not mentioned health issues of HK air polution. The WHO recently stated that air polution causes cancer....which we allready knew.

I don't agree that CX is only for younger guys....but I can see your point that it may be rather time consuming. Years before upgrade is achieved means less time left to get back to the US to start again at a US major.

Natca 12-25-2014 05:41 PM

HaS anyone gotten interviewd lately?

Fetzervalve 12-25-2014 07:33 PM

What about the 747-8F flying at CX?
 
Papoo and other CX flyers,

Thank you for the detailed posts. Sounds like the 777 fleet provides good flying diversity. How does it compare to the 747-8F flying and rosters? I realize not a big fleet. Given the fluctuating state of cargo flying worldwide, is that fleet losing pilots to the 777 or is it stable? Is it a popular fleet among CX pilots? Are newhires (SOs or even DEFOs) often assigned that fleet?

Also, if hired onto the 777 or 748F fleets, how soon before you could bid another type (i.e., A350) or are you stuck on your fleet similar to Emirates?

kycfi85 01-13-2015 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by outaluckagain (Post 1782027)
What is being said is still far superior to what I may expect to earn in the US. First 3 years at a regional, then finally a start at a major US airline.

The biggest short coming at CX is obviously the social and family aspect. Really not a good idea to start a family living in HK.

I have checked things out and weighed one against the other. The money will be better at CX since the oppertunity to make real pay will come sooner than it would at a US regional. Not saying CX pays better than a US major....Just that it will take at least 3 years before I may expect to get hired at a US major.

All all in all, I will stick to the US regional to US major route, because of the downside of living in HK and the not mentioned health issues of HK air polution. The WHO recently stated that air polution causes cancer....which we allready knew.

I don't agree that CX is only for younger guys....but I can see your point that it may be rather time consuming. Years before upgrade is achieved means less time left to get back to the US to start again at a US major.


You will spend more than than 3 years at a regional before you make it to a major. Bank on that. You should expect 10 years or maybe never making it at all.

OldManReverend 03-15-2015 08:51 PM

Papoo- thanks for all the info, I really appreciate you taking the time to write all of that.

I just got an email from CX last week asking to fill out the flight times and medical info. Any word on the future of hiring there or how long to hear back?

Also, I have an ATP with roughly 4000 hours. I wouldn't mind SO for a year, but I read upgrade to FO is about 3 years. Are there certain requirements for SO's to upgrade to FO's that aren't being met from these pilots with 250 hours + 2 years experience? Curious if flight hours make it possible to upgrade to FO sooner than most?

Also looking for a basic summary of the process of going through the SO program. interview/ Adelaide/ type rating... etc.

Thanks for the responses guys/ gals.

Natca 03-17-2015 07:53 AM

Yes its a 3 year upgrade with no real requirements for internals... its just a seniority order and after 3 years or whatever they will know you performance.

FLowpayFO 03-17-2015 01:54 PM

With the A350's coming, is this growth? Is US or EU basing based on seniority?

Natca 03-19-2015 11:47 AM

More or less seniroity assuming your already on type

Boss Hoggin 03-30-2015 07:30 AM

Insight
 
I have been trying to get hired with CX for over 6 years now. Part 121 PIC experience (regionals). No accidents or incidents on record. Bachelors degree but still no offer. Are their hiring or do I have to pay for a wide body type rating? Is there something I am simply over looking? I for got to mention I have over 5000 hours for flight time.

FLowpayFO 03-30-2015 10:08 AM

I filled out the paperwork and sent it in almost a month ago, still no word. Do they take a while to get back to you to set up an interview? Will there be assessments here in the states or Canada? Or will you directly go to Hong Kong?

Thanks in advance.

Braniff DC8 03-30-2015 09:09 PM

Think twice
 
You might want to talk to a CX pilot or even go to HKG before joining CX. It's gotten so ugly. Pilots, Yes even captains, are retiring early or just quitting because of the mess (read schedules). Perhaps you heard of the 2000$ (257$ USD) the pilots just got for profit sharing. Go and see what the guys and gals at DAL/SWA and UAL got!

Honestly, it's just not worth it. This is from an inside source.

They even have Canadians leaving back to Canada o fly turboprops. Two Captains have quit to go back the their countries to fly Turboprops. This should tell you something.

OldManReverend 03-31-2015 02:28 PM


Originally Posted by FLowpayFO (Post 1852861)
I filled out the paperwork and sent it in almost a month ago, still no word. Do they take a while to get back to you to set up an interview? Will there be assessments here in the states or Canada? Or will you directly go to Hong Kong?

Thanks in advance.

I haven't heard anything from CX either, and I sent in the paper work about a month ago also. Have you looked at Air Japan contract? Sounds like a better deal. Try part aviation and crew.

morerightrudder 03-31-2015 07:02 PM


Originally Posted by Boss Hoggin (Post 1852762)
I have been trying to get hired with CX for over 6 years now. Part 121 PIC experience (regionals). No accidents or incidents on record. Bachelors degree but still no offer. Are their hiring or do I have to pay for a wide body type rating? Is there something I am simply over looking? I for got to mention I have over 5000 hours for flight time.

They're only hiring SOs right now, and 5000 hours is probably overqualified for that position.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands