Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Spirit/Frontier Merger (Again) >

Spirit/Frontier Merger (Again)

Search

Notices

Spirit/Frontier Merger (Again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2024 | 09:23 AM
  #241  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 626
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
I think he said

"they are in a difficult spot, I hope they find some solutions, I have a lot of friends there"

He also said that since Spirit has made their own decision to basically get less ULCC-ish, that leaves Frontier as the sole ULCC, thus a "winner" in that space.

I thought the video was excellent and I think Barry is actually trying to "do better" on outreach.

(not a fan of Barry but heaven forbid we post facts here)
Calling ourselves winners in the space... Tone deaf from a rich CEO. I'm sure the people at Spirit who aren't sure if they will have jobs in the near future appreciate that.

Glad you thought his video was excellent, meanwhile he's glad he's getting an entire contract cycle out of us as one of the lowest paid airbus pilot groups in the country. But yeah we won the race to the bottom.
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 09:28 AM
  #242  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 626
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
they’re not going premium. He said they were going to low cost. Which doesn’t explicitly state as premium.
He said the new Spirit plan is shifting to "mid cost" operator which sounds like they're going to have to provide a more premium product to achieve.
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 09:49 AM
  #243  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default

Originally Posted by planejoe
Calling ourselves winners in the space... Tone deaf from a rich CEO. I'm sure the people at Spirit who aren't sure if they will have jobs in the near future appreciate that.

Glad you thought his video was excellent, meanwhile he's glad he's getting an entire contract cycle out of us as one of the lowest paid airbus pilot groups in the country. But yeah we won the race to the bottom.
Frontier is a winner in the space. If your main competitor just declared bankruptcy, and you did not, you are winning.

Period, the end

(Barry the businessman is indeed delaying contract talks as long as possible. He gets A+ score for "don't spend money until you have to." he gets F- score for "building morale with the Pilots)

It is what it is
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 10:35 AM
  #244  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by planejoe
He said the new Spirit plan is shifting to "mid cost" operator which sounds like they're going to have to provide a more premium product to achieve.
I'll repost what I said on the NK Plan B forum:

"They are basing getting profitable by raising market share in the $200 class from 15% to 20%, sloping to the $600 class from 1.5% to 15%. Maybe getting another 5% @ $200 is achievable, but getting 10 times as many people @ $600 and over 15% of everyone in between without a new pitch & more BFSs, new gate people, food in the airplanes, better reservations options (person you can talk to) is not going to happen. I heard UAL didn't want NK planes because it would take too long and expensive to reconfigure them.

Napkin math: for the first 6 months of the year, NK lost $350M, flying 12M people at $108/person. Breaking even would have required another $30/person. Focussing on getting an extra $50 has a better chance than focussing on an extra $500..."
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 10:40 AM
  #245  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
Frontier is a winner in the space. If your main competitor just declared bankruptcy, and you did not, you are winning.

Period, the end

(Barry the businessman is indeed delaying contract talks as long as possible. He gets A+ score for "don't spend money until you have to." he gets F- score for "building morale with the Pilots)

It is what it is
I was at NK under Indigo. Things got much better after they left and we got Ted. Except NK lost money, and F9 didn't. Not exactly win/win....
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 11:12 AM
  #246  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
I was at NK under Indigo. Things got much better after they left and we got Ted. Except NK lost money, and F9 didn't. Not exactly win/win....
Maybe NK was Indigo's classroom.
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 11:29 AM
  #247  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 751
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
I was at NK under Indigo. Things got much better after they left and we got Ted. Except NK lost money, and F9 didn't. Not exactly win/win....
Similar (but inverse) conundrum for those at F9 pre-Indigo.
Reply
Old 11-23-2024 | 07:45 PM
  #248  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 219
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Similar (but inverse) conundrum for those at F9 pre-Indigo.
Yeah, my UAL SIM partner left F9 after a very long career for that reason.
Reply
Old 11-24-2024 | 08:47 AM
  #249  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 93
From: Lineholder
Default

The way to max profitiability as a ULCC in the US is NOT hard. It's been done before. You just have to be willing to do it. The growth is slow (several years) but certainly obtainable.

First, you need GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE. It is the FIRST thing you must have. If you have to lose money to establish a loyal customer base, it'll be worth it in the end. Frontier and Spirit are perfect examples of how not doing this may work in the short term (during a down economy) but is not sustainable.

Second, you need to develop a hearty rewards and credit card program. Airlines don't always make money but credit cards almost always do. Loyalty in these areas (as well as great customer service) allows you to charge higher prices for the same product being offered by others. We have this but are late to the party with it.

Third, you need to be SMART about your airline decisions. Base choices, route structure/network, HF radios and seating configurations, being on time, etc. all matter. Again, our leadership is not very good at this. Devising a point to point network (when everyone else is hub and spoke) is not all that revolutionary (especially since Europe did it first). Once that plays out and adjustment to current/future times is necessary, this leadership group is severely lacking.

If we re-brand, anything short of these three areas is doomed to mediocrity/failure.

Last edited by dracir1; 11-24-2024 at 08:58 AM.
Reply
Old 11-24-2024 | 09:49 AM
  #250  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 92
From: Joystick Operator
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
The way to max profitiability as a ULCC in the US is NOT hard. It's been done before. You just have to be willing to do it. The growth is slow (several years) but certainly obtainable.

First, you need GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE. It is the FIRST thing you must have. If you have to lose money to establish a loyal customer base, it'll be worth it in the end. Frontier and Spirit are perfect examples of how not doing this may work in the short term (during a down economy) but is not sustainable.

Second, you need to develop a hearty rewards and credit card program. Airlines don't always make money but credit cards almost always do. Loyalty in these areas (as well as great customer service) allows you to charge higher prices for the same product being offered by others. We have this but are late to the party with it.

Third, you need to be SMART about your airline decisions. Base choices, route structure/network, HF radios and seating configurations, being on time, etc. all matter. Again, our leadership is not very good at this. Devising a point to point network (when everyone else is hub and spoke) is not all that revolutionary (especially since Europe did it first). Once that plays out and adjustment to current/future times is necessary, this leadership group is severely lacking.

If we re-brand, anything short of these three areas is doomed to mediocrity/failure.
We will see what happens... our performance was terrible 2 years ago, it has improved A LOT since then. Even if it still isn't great. We will see what these announcements are... Just another day
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM
BigGuns
Mergers and Acquisitions
50
04-19-2008 05:22 AM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices