Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Flight tests halt for 737 Max... >

Flight tests halt for 737 Max...

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Flight tests halt for 737 Max...

Old 05-10-2017, 05:20 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default Flight tests halt for 737 Max...

Boeing suspends 737 MAX flights, cites ?potential? CFM LEAP-1B issue | Airframes content from ATWOnline

Boeing has suspended 737 MAX flights after being informed by CFM International of a potential issue with the aircraft’s LEAP-1B engine, although Boeing says MAX 8 deliveries will begin this month as planned.

“CFM has notified us of a potential manufacturing quality escape with low pressure turbine (LPT) discs in LEAP-1B engines delivered to Boeing,” Boeing said in a statement. “We are working with CFM to inspect the discs in question. CFM and its supplier notified us after discovering the issue as a part of their quality inspection process. At no time have we experienced an issue associated with the LPT during our ongoing MAX testing program.”

Boeing said the decision to suspend MAX flights was made “out of an abundance of caution.” The suspension comes just as Boeing was preparing to begin delivery the 737 MAX 8, which was certified in March, to airlines. Malaysia’s Malindo Air is expected to receive the first delivery. The aircraft is also expected to enter service this summer with Norwegian. “Our plan remains to begin MAX deliveries in May,” Boeing said, adding that there will be no halt in MAX production or in production and deliveries of 737NG aircraft.

The suspension also comes less than a month after the 737 MAX 9 achieved first flight.

Boeing emphasized that it has had no problems associated with the LEAP-1B in flight testing. “The MAX 8 flight test program put over 2,000 hours on the engines, including abuse testing and flights lasting over 9 hr., undergoing thorough inspections throughout,” Boeing stated. “Additionally, 180-minute ETOPS testing completed in April 2017 required another 3,000 simulated flight cycles on the test stand before a complete inspection was conducted by CFM. The LEAP-1B and 737 MAX [8] have been certified to the most stringent requirements in commercial aviation.”

A CFM spokesperson noted the potential issue was not discovered in flight testing or on any aircraft out in the field, but during a quality inspection in the factory, and the decision to suspend flights was made out of caution.

CFM is a GE Aviation/Safran Aircraft Engines joint venture.

The spokesperson added that CFM has two suppliers for the LPTs used on the LEAP-1B, and the potential issue is only with one supplier’s LPT. The CFM LEAP-1A engine powering Airbus A320neo family aircraft is not affected by the potential issue.
TheFly is offline  
Old 05-11-2017, 12:37 PM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Manufacturing QA issue, not design problem, so just a speedbump.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-15-2017, 03:58 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Manufacturing QA issue, not design problem, so just a speedbump.
Kind of an ironic term when talking about the original jet transport speed bump itself.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 05-22-2017, 07:32 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 150
Default

Why anyone buys a 737 anymore is a surprise to me when the 320 family is better in every way.
Lemons is offline  
Old 05-22-2017, 10:58 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Lemons View Post
Why anyone buys a 737 anymore is a surprise to me when the 320 family is better in every way.
There must be more to owning/operating a fleet for 20+ years than what the driver likes. There had to be a good reason for AA to buy MD80s and F100s or Delta buying a handful of MD90s. Then again, they also thought 50 seaters and Song was a good idea.
kevbo is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 04:41 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,259
Default

[QUOTE=Lemons;2367851]Why anyone buys a 737 anymore is a surprise to me when the 320 family is better in every way.[/QUOT

Except for dispatch reliability, fuel burn per seat and overall operating cost.
sailingfun is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
18
06-08-2014 08:31 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
02-05-2013 08:00 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
05-23-2012 07:37 AM
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices