Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-2018, 03:47 PM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 115
Default Future job risk?

I could see the airlines going for this since they'd be able to fly so many more people with fewer pilots and, from the sound of things, no jet fuel costs. Who knows how long it would take to come out, though.

https://weather.com/science/video/co...uld-carry-2000
P Owed Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2018, 04:00 PM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Trolley Bus Capn
Posts: 6,032
Default

LOL






filler
ShyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2018, 04:35 PM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,290
Default

Judging by California's high speed rail, ACTUAL airplanes would be cheaper and certainly faster.
Excargodog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2018, 05:03 PM   #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Up Front
Posts: 897
Default

Ain’t gonna hold my breath waiting for it to happen. Lots of hairbrained schemes come from universities and appear on the cover of Popular Science. Less than 1 in 100 actually take off, no pun intended.
TransWorld is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2018, 06:54 PM   #5  
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 20,836
Default

Like any other high speed train concept, this kind of thing *might possibly* work in high density, small geography Japan, Western Europe, and a few places like SOCAL, NORCAL, and NY/DC corridor.

But there are many problems...

Infrastructure: Imminent domain for the rail would be the biggie. You could use existing railroad rights-of-way where the rail is straight enough and in unpopulated areas. But existing rail with tight curves would not work, and NIMBY's would oppose any significant expansion of status quo use of existing rail lines on grounds of noise, safety, and visual clutter.

Weather:
1) It would be under ALL weather.
2) It cannot deviate to avoid weather.
3) It cannot climb to avoid weather.
4) It's still an airplane (and fragile looking), and would be destroyed if it flew through a TS or severe ice.

Security: The plane is easily accessible by bad guys along any point in it's route. The power supply is easily accessible by bad guys along any point in it's route. A crash would make big headlines.

I think the most likely mass transit revolution (other than improved airliners with lower cost and environmental impact) will be high-speed underground tubes. That solves most of the security, imminent domain, and public perception issue. But it will cost huge $$$ to drill underground tunnels over vast distances (ex. Chunnel).

These visionaries (including Uber) are going to learn the hard way that the urban public will probably not be very keen on a massive increase in low-altitude airborne noise and clutter.
rickair7777 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 09:30 PM   #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 35
Default

I would never set foot on that thing. I couldn't tell from the video and it may be a silly question but would the "airtrain" or "traincraft" or whatever it is be piloted by actual trained pilots or would they do away with traditional pilots and allow some lesser trained, non-licensed people who are just taught how to work some basic controls operate it? What if the tether detaches or what if due to an unforseen circumstances the operator needs to detach the tether? I just wouldn't be comfortable riding on that thing when there is no person with the experience, skill and instinct to maneuver the craft in response to an emergency. I'm sure the concept would develop over time but the thought of this for me at this time is absolutely not.
jDSTJD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2018, 12:50 PM   #7  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,836
Default

https://weather.com/science/video/co...uld-carry-2000

Quote:
Turkish architecture firm Dahir Insaat designed a concept for a flying double-decker train.
Turkey is the same place that sacrificed camels when upgrading aircraft for the national airline...sacrificed them on the ramp in front of the passenger terminal.

Concept...notion, idea. Does not exist.
JohnBurke is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? Guard Dude Delta 196248 Today 07:02 AM
Job Fairs Crazy Canuck Career Questions 16 01-15-2016 10:48 AM
Phoenix Job Fair-Pilot Hiring Update for 2012 AeroCrewSolut Hiring News 2 01-26-2012 10:49 PM
American Eagle Job Fair jet320 Regional 16 02-27-2008 12:25 PM
not taking résumés, not hiring: why UPS @ job fair? Haus Cargo 139 02-15-2008 09:21 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 AM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2018, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1