Boeing 737 Max compared to Airbus A320 Neo
#41
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
IIRC, RR bailed on NMA, but they still have two vendors lined up.
NMA *should * be relatively quick and easy to be build. They are not trying out a bunch of new gee-whiz tech or production paradigms (like 787), it's more an exercise in applying existing tech (much of it new-ish but already flying on other planes) to a different size niche. Same with motors, they'll use existing cores, tweaked for the specific mission. They know it has to get to market (relatively) quickly, otherwise the niche will get filled with buses of one flavor or another.
NMA *should * be relatively quick and easy to be build. They are not trying out a bunch of new gee-whiz tech or production paradigms (like 787), it's more an exercise in applying existing tech (much of it new-ish but already flying on other planes) to a different size niche. Same with motors, they'll use existing cores, tweaked for the specific mission. They know it has to get to market (relatively) quickly, otherwise the niche will get filled with buses of one flavor or another.
#42
PW is still in the mix, I assume they can readily adjust one of their existing GTFs.
#43
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
The PW UHBGTF started concept testing late last year, its slated EIS isn't till 2030. That engine is to compete with the UltraFan. The only company that can maybe do the 797 is an upscaled CFM Leap. However, the A321XLR will still kill that plane in fuel burn, as a GTF can't be beat on long range flying.
#45
The whole fan diameter issue with the 737 is why some folks suspect NMA might be the foundation of a new NB type as well. They can get the thing flying before airbus is even sure about what they're up to, then wham, roll out a single-aisle fuselage they've developed on the DL.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post