Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee send FAA back to the bargaining table >

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee send FAA back to the bargaining table

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee send FAA back to the bargaining table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2007, 06:30 PM
  #1  
Big Poppa
Thread Starter
 
LeoSV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 613
Default Transportation and Infrastructure Committee send FAA back to the bargaining table

WASHINGTON – National Air Traffic Controllers Association President Patrick Forrey released the following statement today upon the markup of a Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The bill includes language that would send NATCA and the FAA back to the negotiating table to finish work on a collective bargaining agreement; with binding arbitration waiting at the end of the fair process should the 15-month impasse not be broken by the parties.


“This bill is an important step toward putting fairness back into the collective bargaining process. The FAA unilaterally imposed work and pay rules on controllers last Labor Day weekend, exacerbating a critical staffing shortage that even the Department of Transportation Inspector General validated in a recent report. Morale has suffered, and the mass exodus has left controllers working for longer periods of time, causing fatigue and loss of focus, which the NTSB has said is a major safety concern.


“Veteran controllers are the professionals holding the system together, while at the same time, responsible for training the next generation of air traffic controllers. The FAA’s staffing to budget has resulted in the frantic hiring of new trainees who will require years to certify before contributing to the system. These veteran professionals must have an incentive to stick around past their retirement eligibility date – which many of them have circled on their calendars – and a ratifiable contract is exactly the incentive they are waiting for. This bill language is a means to that end and is critically important when you’re talking about the ability of the FAA to safely and efficiently keep the air traffic control system moving.


“NATCA would like to thank the members of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee for acting on behalf of the safety of the flying public. Speaking for the men and women who guide you home every day, I am indebted to Chairman James Oberstar (MN-8), Chairman Jerry Costello (IL-12), Congressman Steven LaTourette (OH-14) and Congressman Frank LoBiondo (NJ-2) for their unwavering commitment to keeping the National Airspace System the safest and most reliable in the world.”
LeoSV is offline  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:09 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

That's great!

Controllers deserve to be paid better, or the government needs to get some funds appropriated to get facilities properly staffed.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:45 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Andrew_VT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 584
Default

this specific bill also has the most pro-GA language yet. For GA it would mean no user-fees and only a small % increase in the fuel tax that would compensate for inflation. It also provides the most airport improvement funds yet.

Too bad Bush is going to veto it because of the above mentioned ATC/NACTA provisions.
Andrew_VT is offline  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:56 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldveedubs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: pǝʇɹǝʌuı
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew_VT View Post
this specific bill also has the most pro-GA language yet. For GA it would mean no user-fees and only a small % increase in the fuel tax that would compensate for inflation. It also provides the most airport improvement funds yet.

Too bad Bush is going to veto it because of the above mentioned ATC/NACTA provisions.
Someone has been reading their August AOPA Pilot!
oldveedubs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices