Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Execs Flying Themselves >

Execs Flying Themselves

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Execs Flying Themselves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:07 AM
  #1  
vagabond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 0
From: C-172
Default Execs Flying Themselves

Here's a humorous quote. Pilots are not people, so what are they?

"Until that moment it didn't really occur to me that people could be pilots," he said. "I thought only pilots could be pilots."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21327929/
Reply
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:33 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,187
Likes: 807
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

The article claims this is a new phenomenon...people have been doing this for decades. If anything I think there are fewer pilots who fly themselves for business. GA is declining, and the time and effort required to get trained and stay current is more than most busy people can spare today.
Reply
Old 10-18-2007 | 11:09 AM
  #3  
Spartan07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: C152
Default

God forbid the greedy b@st@rds in our government ever impose user fees on top of the recent fuel tax increase. If the airlines and the FAA have it their way GA will be a long distant memory, or at least the domain of only the ultra-rich.

Can you imagine an aviation industry where even the cheapest flight training is doubled in price from that of today? Who in their right mind would even consider it to be a good idea if flight training costs doubled at almost all levels? Future airline pilots would almost have to be kids with extremely rich parents or forty-something year old businessmen that decide they can finally pursue their dreams...

I honestly hope GA never goes away or becomes a distant daydream for those of us that scrimp and save for every flight hour we get.
Reply
Old 10-18-2007 | 01:48 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Any, usually behind the wing
Default

Unless you have a very fast (read expensive) General Aviation A/C it hardly seems worth it. Preflight, fueling, flightplan, travel, close out plan, tie down, get rental or courtesy car it might not be worth it in Cessna 172. Maybe in Pilatus PC-12, but I think the 10X cost might hold some people back.
Reply
Old 10-19-2007 | 11:35 AM
  #5  
DamonMeyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Ramen-eating duck driver
Default On the other hand...

Originally Posted by OldAg84
Unless you have a very fast (read expensive) General Aviation A/C it hardly seems worth it. Preflight, fueling, flightplan, travel, close out plan, tie down, get rental or courtesy car it might not be worth it in Cessna 172. Maybe in Pilatus PC-12, but I think the 10X cost might hold some people back.
Depends what kind of GA flying you do. Personal transportation (recreational or professional) begs for an experimental. Not everything fast and capable is expensive. You can travel long distances IFR behind a glass panel at 200 KTAS and 10gph in the right plane, <100K acquisition cost...there are obviously some tradeoffs, it's not for everyone.
Reply
Old 10-19-2007 | 11:56 AM
  #6  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

You also need to factor in savings in travel time if your destination is not near a major airport with airline service. The airlines only serve a few hundred airports in the US while GA opens you up to thousands. That time preflighting and getting the rental car can pay off big when you're only 10 miles from your destination versus 100.

There's also something to be said about not loosing an entire day in flights. Get things done at the office in the morning, and be where you need to be when you need to be there rather than when the airlines have a flight there.
Reply
Old 10-19-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
Spartan07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: C152
Default

Not to mention actually enjoying the commuting instead of dreading it. I'm pretty sure for business owners that spend most of their life working and traveling to and fro it is worth any extra cost.
Reply
Old 10-20-2007 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
DamonMeyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Ramen-eating duck driver
Default

Originally Posted by Spartan07
Not to mention actually enjoying the commuting instead of dreading it.
You got that right. I did it for a year, and decided I liked the commute a lot better than the actual job.
Reply
Old 10-20-2007 | 04:53 PM
  #9  
FlyingChipmunk's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: DA50EX
Default

I used to train a CFO at a Fortune 500. His company banned him from using his personal airplane for buisness travel.
Reply
Old 10-20-2007 | 05:32 PM
  #10  
Spartan07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: C152
Default

Hm, I wonder if there are any airline pilots that commute this way. That would probably make being a commuter a little better
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CPOonfinal
Flight Schools and Training
9
10-06-2007 07:09 PM
wrf2e
Hangar Talk
23
09-27-2007 05:15 PM
aircraftdriver
Major
1
09-21-2007 08:19 AM
ToiletDuck
Regional
10
09-10-2007 06:30 PM
Fly4Beer
Major
98
03-16-2006 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices