Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Is this the future of GA? >

Is this the future of GA?

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Is this the future of GA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2008 | 08:07 PM
  #1  
jsfBoat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Default Is this the future of GA?

Found this website, and it would be very cool if GA airplanes would look like the one that's being pitched on this website: Flight Sciences - The Persuit Of Excellence In Flight
Reply
Old 09-10-2008 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
atpwannabe's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

If so our grandchildren will see a/c like that.



atp
Reply
Old 09-11-2008 | 03:47 AM
  #3  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

I'm all for good ideas coming to fruition and for experimentation, innovation etc. but I do not see a single new idea in this design. Burt Rutan has pretty adequately explored most of the areas available in GA canard pusher composite airplanes and several contemporary manufacturers have composite designs fully approved for production. Designing airplanes is the easy part. There is a lot of knowledge, data and experience on tap. The difficulty is in the mind boggling details involved in making a viable production model and this occurs long after experimentation is mostly completed. When a new design is mostly finalized, it may be several years before it can actually go into production. For complex designs the rule of thumb is 7 years for an established traditional engineering firm like Cessna, Lockheed, Boeing, etc. to get things up and running. It's maybe a three month endeavor to produce a viable design for almost any aircraft imaginable, so there is a huge difference in the length of these phases. Hate to say it, but tossing off viable aircraft designs is cheap. College students do it all the time.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 09-11-2008 at 04:06 AM.
Reply
Old 09-11-2008 | 05:56 AM
  #4  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

I think it's ugly, so I hope not! Cub driver got the rest
Reply
Old 09-11-2008 | 08:38 AM
  #5  
alarkyokie's Avatar
Weekends off? HA!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Default

Maybe this is--FAA cops.
https://www.faasafety.gov/files/noti...P_Brochure.pdf
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SNIZ
Cargo
151
09-28-2008 03:12 PM
Waldo11
Your Photos and Videos
11
09-03-2008 08:35 PM
UAL T38 Phlyer
Major
2
08-15-2008 08:12 PM
FlyOrDie
Your Photos and Videos
2
08-07-2008 04:41 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices