Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
AA Sued By Family Of PAX Who "Died Sweaty" >

AA Sued By Family Of PAX Who "Died Sweaty"

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

AA Sued By Family Of PAX Who "Died Sweaty"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2011, 07:01 PM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default AA Sued By Family Of PAX Who "Died Sweaty"

What kind of tort is to die sweaty?

Did the chicken meal cause the heart attack?

How many other people ate the chicken but did not die of a heart attack?

How many other people ate the chicken but did not die at all?

Does one have to have a medical degree to get a job as a gate agent these days?

From Miami News Times:

​It's been a rough week for American Airlines. Not only did the company file for bankruptcy protection, but a widow is claiming her husband died sweaty after eating the airplane chicken.
According to the suit, Miamian Othon Cortes and his wife Raquel were on a flight from Barcelona to New York's JFK Airport-- the first leg on their trip home-- when they were served a meal. Though it may seem like it these days, that is not the shocking part of the story.
Othon ordered the chicken meal, while Raquel ate an in-flight meal (fish, we're guessing) that didn't have chicken. In the JFK airport, Othon became pale, experienced "sharp stomach cramps" and was suddenly very thirsty.
Raquel says that as they boarded the flight to Miami, her husband's illness was "expressed and obvious" to AA staff, but they were allowed on the plane anyway. He went downhill on the plane to Miami, suffering from nauseousness and shortness of breath and, eventually, a heart attack.
The plane made an emergency landing in Norfolk, Virginia, where Othon was pronounced dead.
On the day before Thanksgiving in Miami court, Raquel and Othon's daughter, Sandra Cortes, filed suit against American Airlines and Sky Chefs, the airplane catering company that apparently served the fateful meal.
(Update: LSG Sky Chefs spokesperson David Margulies emailed us to say: "Our company did not cater the flight in question and will file a motion to have its name removed from the defendants in the case.")
They claim that the chicken was "poisoned" with the bacteria C. perfringens-- and that AA was negligent in allowing Othon to board the domestic flight, failing to provide medical attention, and waiting too long to pull an emergency landing.
American Airlines did not respond to Riptide's requests for comment.


American Airlines "Poisoned Food" Caused Passenger's Death, Claims Lawsuit UPDATED - Miami News - Riptide 2.0
vagabond is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
etflies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
Default

Does AMR filing for bankruptcy change how lawsuits like this might be handled?
etflies is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 12:51 AM
  #3  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

I have died sweaty a whole bunch of times, God she was great.
jungle is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 01:43 AM
  #4  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Another lawyer looking for a payout
and
in other news, water is wet.
Thedude is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 02:27 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 82
Default It's not my fault, I'm a victim

So let me get this straight--the wife accompanies her husband on these flights, presumably sitting right next to him the entire time, and is certainly in the best position to observe her husband's condition, yet it is somehow AA's fault for failing to notice anything amiss? Just when you think someone has set the standard for no shame, a better competitor comes along.
jagbn is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 06:54 AM
  #6  
Working Class Dog
 
11Fan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Spares Pusher
Posts: 1,668
Default

He should have had the fish.
11Fan is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 08:02 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

If it truely was food poisoning, or such, I feel for them. But if it is just coincidental and the real reason he bought the farm was because years of bodily neglect, then they shouldn't get a dime. Just like dwight schrute said after he was blamed for stanley's heart attack: "ya, because I fed him butter and sugar for the last fifty years and forced him NOT to exercise."
Always someone elses fault.
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 08:05 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: F-16
Posts: 186
Default Fish vs Chicken

The lawyer missed the target. They should be suing Paramount Pictures.

Why? Hear me out... In 1980, Paramount released Airplane! which obviously misled the plaintiff into believing that the chicken was much safer than the fish...

Droopy
Droopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beatupsuitcase
Cargo
56
08-22-2011 11:07 PM
Laughing_Jakal
Cargo
16
06-01-2010 07:41 AM
DWN3GRN
Major
15
12-05-2009 10:43 AM
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
143
11-17-2008 09:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices