FAA ruling for the birds!
#1
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
#4
#5
Are you advocating NON-commercial pilots getting paid for flying?
Or that light sport aircraft with the lack of regulation, oversight, trainng requirements, and safety be available for use by the general public in uncontrolled settings?
USMCFLYR
#6
Not sure I understand this.
Are you advocating NON-commercial pilots getting paid for flying?
Or that light sport aircraft with the lack of regulation, oversight, trainng requirements, and safety be available for use by the general public in uncontrolled settings?
USMCFLYR
Are you advocating NON-commercial pilots getting paid for flying?
Or that light sport aircraft with the lack of regulation, oversight, trainng requirements, and safety be available for use by the general public in uncontrolled settings?
USMCFLYR
#7
Neither. I don't see the problem here. The people flying the LSA's are not being paid specifically to fly the planes, they are trained professionals who are being paid to care for the birds. Their work started long before they flew the migration path. If they're being compensated for nursing the birds to flight status and then are not paid for the flying part, which is what I gathered from reading a few articles about this matter, I don't see what the problem is.
There were some good threads on here earlier in year with people asking about doing 'Lights' tours and such and the discussions led more in-depth into the whole compensation issue. It certainly didn't seem clear cut.
Your part about them being paid for the nursing and then not the flying part might be semantics, it might be grey, it might right or wrong. I'm sure the tree-hugging liberlists pseudo-terrorist conservatory organization (as long as we are throwing names around) and the "thugs" will figure it all out in due time
In the end the Whooping Cranes made it to where they need to be.
I applaud the success.
USMCFLYR
Edit. Btw - I really know nothing about the organization and certainly support the cause; I was just making a sarcastic point about the name-calling.
#8
If you are correct and they are in fact salaried personel, then that will come out in the talks between the organization and the FAA after they are done with this flight. In the articles I have read, it did not explain it that way. Even if so, with the way regulations might be INTERPRETED, if part of their job description is the requirement to fly and they are getting paid, that might fall under the same 'holding out' type of clause.
lol!!! Touche! Ya, I guess 'thugs' was a little heavy handed. I'm just getting sick of hearing the govt sticking their hand in everything... That comment was misguided, sorry to anyone who may have taken that the wrong way.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post