Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
MD-80 hard landing (video) >

MD-80 hard landing (video)

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

MD-80 hard landing (video)

Old 07-15-2005, 09:33 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SWAjet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 437
Default MD-80 hard landing (video)

The F/As in the aft couldn't have been happy after this doozy
http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...eos/MD-80.mpeg
SWAjet is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 01:56 PM
  #2  
On Reserve
 
Grim Reaper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: ballistic
Posts: 13
Default MD80 Hard Landing

I wouldn't want to have been on the pottie during this one!! This would have been a severe downloading.

Last edited by Grim Reaper; 04-05-2006 at 01:59 PM.
Grim Reaper is offline  
Old 04-06-2006, 07:16 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Default

Does that require a report to the NTSB?
G-Dog is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 08:10 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Math Teacher
Posts: 2,273
Default MD-80 hard landing

All I could say was, "Whew. Good God amighty!!!!
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:56 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Any, usually behind the wing
Posts: 382
Default

I think this was an MD test flight gone awry. I think I read somewhere the reattached the piece and the plane flew again. Does anyone know the real story behind the video and where the plane may have wound up?
OldAg84 is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 12:27 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,057
Default

That airplane would not be airworthly if they just reattached the tail. Not only would the tail section be weak, but take a look at the fuselage during that video. That thing almost snapped like a toothpick.
ryane946 is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 03:24 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default Stuff happens

I understand that, during certification testing, one of the first MD-80s (then called the DC-9-80), departed the runway at Yuma and broke its back in a ditch. The Marines loaned Douglas a crane to recover it. An FAA guy was at the controls.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 04-10-2006, 06:12 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Any, usually behind the wing
Posts: 382
Default

Ryan,

I kind of figured (but did not post) that the A/C would need substantial looking over- besides taping the tail back on!

I'm not a pilot, but in the video the rate of descent sure looks high. I suppose it was some good luck the landing gear stayed put and they rolled out.

Either way it's interesting- though not fun- to watch.

OA84
OldAg84 is offline  
Old 04-10-2006, 07:21 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,057
Default

Having worked as an aerospace engineer for Adam aircraft, I was involved in a lot of the stress tests. The landing gear is probably one of the most solid features on any aircraft (along with the wing). We would test the landing gear with a solid mass (Evenly distributed to match the approximate density of the aircraft), and then drop it from 20 meters(60+ feet) to test the gear at a 1200ft/min rate of descent. However, I am almost positive that any fuselage would snap at 1200ft/min, and that is probably why we always used a solid mass.
ryane946 is offline  
Old 04-10-2006, 09:51 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crashman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Lying Groaning in the Wreckage
Posts: 130
Cool report on this incident

Originally Posted by OldAg84
I think this was an MD test flight gone awry. I think I read somewhere the reattached the piece and the plane flew again. Does anyone know the real story behind the video and where the plane may have wound up?
My friend Jay, owner of the Alexis Park Inn (best crash/weird incident page on the Net BTW) says: "This was an early DC-9/MD-80 certification test. After this little demonstration they beefed up the tail section -- for obvious reasons!"
And the NTSB had this to say about the matter: http://www.alexisparkinn.com/Photoga...t/AAR82-02.pdf

During a landing distance certification at Edwards AFB in May 1980, the ATP engineering test pilot was using a HUD doing some exotic pitch v. descent stabilization concept using only power to control sink rate (??? Ok for stabilizing approach but - no flare?). Keeping the pitch attitude fixed & stable all the way to touchdown (???) for some reason I don't understand. Basically he intentionally didn't flare much if at all, only tried to flare 1 second before touchdown - I mean impact- and never broke the sink rate. Until the sink rate broke his nice airplane.

Last edited by Crashman; 04-10-2006 at 09:58 PM.
Crashman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nitefrater
Cargo
70
03-26-2009 05:24 PM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
0
07-28-2006 12:38 PM
AIRGUY
Regional
39
01-30-2006 08:47 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
3
12-07-2005 10:58 AM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
0
06-29-2005 05:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices