Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Woman Sues FedEx Over Pot Delivery >

Woman Sues FedEx Over Pot Delivery

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Woman Sues FedEx Over Pot Delivery

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2013, 06:52 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default Woman Sues FedEx Over Pot Delivery

From Associated Press:

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — A Massachusetts woman is suing FedEx, saying the company erroneously sent her a package containing seven pounds of marijuana, then gave her address to the intended recipients who later showed up at her door.
Maryangela Tobin of Plymouth says in the suit filed Feb. 12 the company violated state privacy laws by disclosing her address and put her and her children in danger.
She says as soon as she opened the package, which she thought was a birthday present for her daughter, she called police.
Soon after, a stranger knocked and repeatedly asked if she had his package. She slammed and bolted her door.
Police made an arrest, but Tobin says she's scared of retribution from the drug dealers.
Memphis, Tenn.-based FedEx says it doesn't comment on pending lawsuits.
vagabond is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 07:10 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RhinoPherret's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I am betting it was not an erroneously sent package and it WAS a birthday present for her daughter.

After a birthday present like that, no need for any trick candles on the cake.
RhinoPherret is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 07:17 AM
  #3  
Out to pasture...
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 98
Default

Obviously, I don't know about this particular situation. But drug dealers have on occasion used a random address for their delivery, figuring that it will likely be left on the front porch and that they can pick it up before the real homeowner comes home. This may be the case here, and the drug dealer thought she'd just hand over the package thinking it had been delivered to the wrong address by mistake. I really seriously doubt FedEx would ever give anyone's address to someone simply claiming they were missing their package. If a FedEx employee did do so, you can bet they have already been fired.
av8rdude is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 08:09 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by av8rdude View Post
Obviously, I don't know about this particular situation. But drug dealers have on occasion used a random address for their delivery, figuring that it will likely be left on the front porch and that they can pick it up before the real homeowner comes home. This may be the case here, and the drug dealer thought she'd just hand over the package thinking it had been delivered to the wrong address by mistake. I really seriously doubt FedEx would ever give anyone's address to someone simply claiming they were missing their package. If a FedEx employee did do so, you can bet they have already been fired.

Yeah the drug dealers probably already knew the address because they sent it there.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 08:50 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by av8rdude View Post
Obviously, I don't know about this particular situation. But drug dealers have on occasion used a random address for their delivery, figuring that it will likely be left on the front porch and that they can pick it up before the real homeowner comes home. This may be the case here, and the drug dealer thought she'd just hand over the package thinking it had been delivered to the wrong address by mistake. I really seriously doubt FedEx would ever give anyone's address to someone simply claiming they were missing their package. If a FedEx employee did do so, you can bet they have already been fired.
They would if the callers had the airway bill number.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 03:27 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by RhinoPherret View Post
I am betting it was not an erroneously sent package and it was for her daughter.
I'd make the same wager.
UnderOveur is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 04:11 PM
  #7  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond View Post

From Associated Press:


... woman is suing FedEx, saying the company erroneously sent her a package ... then gave her address to the intended recipients ...

Quite a bit of information is collected on each package, and is available to be viewed by anyone who has the Airbill Number. You can call 1-800-GO FEDEX, or log on to fedex.com, or ... there's even an APP for that. You can sign up to have status updates sent to you as text messages or e-mails ... right up to the point where the package is delivered. If a signature is required and obtained, you can even get Delivery Verification.


I never open a package that comes to the house without looking to see who it's FOR and who it's FROM. If this lady opened a pacakge with somebody else's name and address on it, she invited trouble.

If it had her name and address on it, she might have a case, but the article says that she said the package was erroneously delivered to her.

If that's the case, and I'm the intended recipient, I can use any of those methods to see that the package was delivered at 10:03AM, left at the front door of 1020 Oak Street instead of 2010 Oak Street. The Sender and the Recipient are entitled to know where the package went. At that point, it's pretty easy to walk down the street and knock on the door. If the package is on the porch, or if it hasn't been opened, no harm, no foul.


She screwed up when she opened the package that didn't belong to her.

She did the right thing to call the police.

She's justified in being scared about retribution.

FedEx is liable to the Sender (or Intended Recipient, depending on who was paying for the shipping) for misdelivering the package, but not to the Actual Recipient for violating her privacy. Her street address can be viewed from the curb.

There should have been at least 2 arrests -- the Sender, and the Intended Recipient.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 03-01-2013, 10:16 PM
  #8  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

I wish someone would send me 7 pounds of pot.
vagabond is offline  
Old 03-03-2013, 08:45 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fr8doggie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Junior
Posts: 280
Default

Dealer finds name and address of a house that they have watched to ensure that no one is home during the day, and delivers their goods to that address without signature requirement. Then they wait for the delivery notification and snatch it off the porch. That way if it is intercepted, the dealer has no connection to the package. If the resident does find the package first, they would see their own name and address shown so there would not be particular cause for suspicion.
Fr8doggie is offline  
Old 03-03-2013, 09:30 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
I wish someone would send me 7 pounds of pot.
Don't you just need a prescription in your state?
N9373M is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
Auger In
Major
60
09-08-2010 05:14 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
0
06-19-2008 12:00 AM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
22
06-04-2008 01:16 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices