Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Free Turbine vs Direct Drive >

Free Turbine vs Direct Drive

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Free Turbine vs Direct Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2007, 05:39 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Captain
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by whodis View Post
I stand corrected about that being a limitation on the entire King Air family, but in the 1900 series there is a restriction on running the engine with the prop feathered, but I think that is mainly to protect the windows from the heat, so I guess it makes sense that the smaller versions with the engines in front of the cockpit wouldn't have the same limitation.

.
I can see that limitation, there have been a few windows warped on the Bandits by guys running the engines at high idle for long periods of time in the summer to keep the AC cold.
RedGuy is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 06:21 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kerns bbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: BE9,10,20
Posts: 124
Default

Originally Posted by GauleyPilot View Post
SOP per checklist when starting a King Air 200 with external power is for the props to be in feather. There is nothing in the Limitations of the POH that mentions a prohibition on having the props in feather on the ground. Nothing ever said at Flight Safety or Simcom about heat damage potential.

But you can melt/distort the side windows on the King Airs. It is more of a problem on the 90 and 100 but is still a concern with the 200. It may not be a problem that you will read about in a book but it is a known issue. Simuflite does address the issue in their training and I have personally seen it happen on a 90.

The reason for having the props in feather during an external power start is so that you dont blow away the line personell who are 4 feet behind the props.
kerns bbo is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 06:44 AM
  #13  
Hire me
 
UPTme's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Default

Are the reverse flow engines mentioned the kind like a King Air has where the exhuast comes out from the sides of the engines at the midpoint rather than the rear?

Chicks dig beta.
UPTme is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:03 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kerns bbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: BE9,10,20
Posts: 124
Default

Originally Posted by UPTme View Post
Are the reverse flow engines mentioned the kind like a King Air has where the exhuast comes out from the sides of the engines at the midpoint rather than the rear?

Chicks dig beta.

Yes, the exhaust exits are at the forward end of the engine.
kerns bbo is offline  
Old 01-31-2007, 04:41 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GauleyPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: BE-20, RA390
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by kerns bbo View Post
But you can melt/distort the side windows on the King Airs. It is more of a problem on the 90 and 100 but is still a concern with the 200. It may not be a problem that you will read about in a book but it is a known issue. Simuflite does address the issue in their training and I have personally seen it happen on a 90.

The reason for having the props in feather during an external power start is so that you dont blow away the line personell who are 4 feet behind the props.
Kerns,
What was the situation on the melted-windows 90? Timeframe of event, high ambient temp? etc. What are Simuflite's methods on the topic. I don't spend time in feather on the ground, but I am curious to know.
I guess I should have mentioned why the props are in feather for a ext. power start, thanks for picking that up.

Last edited by GauleyPilot; 01-31-2007 at 04:55 AM.
GauleyPilot is offline  
Old 01-31-2007, 03:46 PM
  #16  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Here's something I've heard, but never found results. Supposedly the TPE's on the MU-2 is quieter in an overflight vs the PT-6 in the King-Air, but no one can argue who's the loudest on the ground!!!!
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 09:10 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Captain
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer View Post
Here's something I've heard, but never found results. Supposedly the TPE's on the MU-2 is quieter in an overflight vs the PT-6 in the King-Air, but no one can argue who's the loudest on the ground!!!!
I can atest to that being true. Our facility is at the end of the runway and I was shocked at how quite the MU-2's where compaired to KingAirs, Caravans, and Bandits. Though none of them are really that loud though. There's nothing quite like a 20 series lear taking off at full power at 3-4am in the dead of winter when it's about 0 deg F out side! The air sounds like it's actually ripping!
RedGuy is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 03:54 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GauleyPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: BE-20, RA390
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by RedGuy View Post
The air sounds like it's actually ripping!
I never will forget the first time I heard a 20-series from the departure end. Funny you say that because I always imagined a piece of tin roof being ripped like paycheck envelope after Christmas when I hear that sound.
GauleyPilot is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 04:20 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kerns bbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: BE9,10,20
Posts: 124
Default

Originally Posted by GauleyPilot View Post
Kerns,
What was the situation on the melted-windows 90? Timeframe of event, high ambient temp? etc. What are Simuflite's methods on the topic. I don't spend time in feather on the ground, but I am curious to know.
I guess I should have mentioned why the props are in feather for a ext. power start, thanks for picking that up.

The 90 window that I saw was melted while a few pilots were on a summer training flight with low winds. In the ground training room at Simuflite they have many sample parts some of which have failed including a window which has distortion caused from a aircraft left for a period in feather. They simply teach you to not leave them in feather for expended periods. Personally, I dont think that it is a huge issue if they are left in feather for short peiods but with the right conditions you need to be aware of the possible problems.
kerns bbo is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 06:40 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GauleyPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: BE-20, RA390
Posts: 644
Default

Thanks for the info Kerns.
GauleyPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAPTAINxJSB
Flight Schools and Training
6
09-29-2006 08:36 AM
ezvictor
Major
4
09-19-2006 09:17 AM
ukaviator
Regional
11
03-12-2006 06:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices