Horizon hiring?

Reply Subscribe

Page 1 of 2

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-02-2008 | 11:34 AM

utedrummer

Thread Starter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 251

Likes: 0

From: Furloughed Righ Seater

Horizon hiring?

Did horizon stop hiring? They had a pilot link on their job page the other day but now its gone. Whats up?

01-02-2008 | 11:58 AM

DrPepper

Guest

Posts: n/a

The hiring plan for 2008 that was issues about a month ago was arround 70 new hires from now until March. I checked today and that number is now down to 37 new hires from now until may. I dont know if they are just going to update the page month-by-month but it seems like they changed their minds about the big hiring plan.

01-02-2008 | 03:43 PM

PeopleMover

Line Holder

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 47

Likes: 0

From: Right seater

One of the factors was the 60-65 rule. I think QX had 14 planning on retiring in 08, but now thats changed. 37+14 does not equal 70, but I am sure that had something to do with it.

01-02-2008 | 03:46 PM

Dash8Pilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 352

Likes: 0

From: Dreamniner

I would guess that reduced CA attrition might also be to blame. Alaska and Southwest have pretty much stopped hiring, and those were the two places that most Captains seemed to be going.

01-02-2008 | 08:09 PM

Slipstream

Line Holder

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 34

Likes: 0

From: 737 Captain

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dash8Pilot

I would guess that reduced CA attrition might also be to blame. Alaska and Southwest have pretty much stopped hiring, and those were the two places that most Captains seemed to be going.

I didn't think Alaska was raiding any of Horizon's captains, hence the 2000 hour SIC policy for Horizon FOs that was enacted last year.

Rephrasing: It's not that Alaska doesn't want Horizon captains; it's that Horizon captains have no reason to apply at Alaska! Chances are, they're already living and based where they want to live and be based, and the pay penalty coming to Alaska from the left seat of a Horizon CRJ is pretty steep.

Last edited by Slipstream; 01-02-2008 at 08:13 PM. Reason: Rephrase

01-03-2008 | 10:34 AM

JungleBus

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 1,518

Likes: 0

From: B737 CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slipstream

Well duh, anybody in the left seat of the CRJ tends to be an old fart that won't be going anywhere. However, until Age 65, there were still Q200 CAs going elsewhere, including AS. Also, age 65 means there prolly won't be any more 2000SIC FOs leaving for AS anytime soon, and I'm sure they were planning on more going when the hiring plan called for 70 newhires.

01-03-2008 | 10:38 AM

jelloy683

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 152

Likes: 0

Somebody posted earlier that the reason why Horizon's pay was above average was because it's considered hazardous flying...is this true?

01-03-2008 | 11:47 AM

de727ups

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 4,357

Likes: 0

From: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT

Not true...

01-03-2008 | 01:02 PM

waflyboy

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 955

Likes: 0

From: 737 Right

Quote:

Originally Posted by jelloy683

Somebody posted earlier that the reason why Horizon's pay was above average was because it's considered hazardous flying...is this true?

It must have been true when they flew Metros!

01-03-2008 | 01:27 PM

#10

Fishfreighter

Banned

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 1,480

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slipstream

Rephrasing: It's not that Alaska doesn't want Horizon captains; it's that Horizon captains have no reason to apply at Alaska! Chances are, they're already living and based where they want to live and be based, and the pay penalty coming to Alaska from the left seat of a Horizon CRJ is pretty steep.

Your rephrase is pretty much spot on.