![]() |
Loa 9
Discuss.
How many pilots are actually 63 and over on property? COLA aimed at Mil guys/gals? Anyone else bite? Can only assume that the F word is the next step. |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019201)
Discuss.
How many pilots are actually 63 and over on property? COLA aimed at Mil guys/gals? Anyone else bite? Can only assume that the F word is the next step. Depends on if JB takes the grants. If they do, they can't furlough through Sep 30th. |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019201)
Discuss.
How many pilots are actually 63 and over on property? COLA aimed at Mil guys/gals? Anyone else bite? Can only assume that the F word is the next step. |
I’m bidding for it. Hoping they will give it to
me. Love to get it for the next 30 years. |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019201)
Discuss.
How many pilots are actually 63 and over on property? COLA aimed at Mil guys/gals? Anyone else bite? Can only assume that the F word is the next step. |
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 3019266)
You have access to the SL, right? 61 as of today, I believe.
|
Sorry, this doesn’t save the day by any means. Hypothetically if all 68 take it it saves them 23.8 million over 2 years. That’s with a modest 350k total compensation per pilot that takes it. Not everyone is at the top of the list.
I was optimistic at the beginning of this whole thing. Not so much anymore. |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019387)
Sorry, this doesn’t save the day by any means. Hypothetically if all 68 take it it saves them 23.8 million over 2 years. That’s with a modest 350k total compensation per pilot that takes it. Not everyone is at the top of the list.
I was optimistic at the beginning of this whole thing. Not so much anymore. It will save less than a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of $23.8 million. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3019403)
Sorry bud, your math is WAY off.
It will save less than a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of $23.8 million. |
Filllllerrr
|
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019431)
oh yah I think that’s what I meant. I mean basically it’s what you said I just said it in my own way.
I'm so dumber at public maffs and readings. You dun good. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3019441)
Ah! You said over *2* years!
I'm so dumber at public maffs and readings. You dun good. 68 people. I cannot imagine more than 30 people taking it. I don’t see the benefit in this at all. Save a few pennies? We’ve been steeping over dollars for years. also, a COLA? Did I miss the part of when they didn’t fill all the 50 hour incentive lines? Did I miss the memo of why they didn’t fill them all? And now they expect people to go away without being paid? Why are we just copying and pasting what AA did? |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019489)
I mean basically what I said is... it’s basically kind not really helpful really. forget the 7 am math problems.
68 people. I cannot imagine more than 30 people taking it. I don’t see the benefit in this at all. Save a few pennies? We’ve been steeping over dollars for years. also, a COLA? Did I miss the part of when they didn’t fill all the 50 hour incentive lines? Did I miss the memo of why they didn’t fill them all? And now they expect people to go away without being paid? Why are we just copying and pasting what AA did? Read your contract our CBA it's different that AA CBA. What does AA even have to do with us? Knowledge is power. It's called furlough mitigation. They are following the contract. |
JMO, They should have offered it to anyone with 10 or 12 years or more on property with an irrevocable letter of resignation to be paid out for 24 months at 50hrs.
I think they'd have a lot more offers to bounce out. |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019489)
I mean basically what I said is... it’s basically kind not really helpful really. forget the 7 am math problems.
68 people. I cannot imagine more than 30 people taking it. I don’t see the benefit in this at all. Save a few pennies? We’ve been steeping over dollars for years. also, a COLA? Did I miss the part of when they didn’t fill all the 50 hour incentive lines? Did I miss the memo of why they didn’t fill them all? And now they expect people to go away without being paid? Why are we just copying and pasting what AA did? |
Originally Posted by hyperboy
(Post 3019500)
Read your contract our CBA it's different that AA CBA. What does AA even have to do with us? Knowledge is power. It's called furlough mitigation. They are following the contract.
Get off your high horse bub. And yes this is identical to what AA offered to their employees. You think 68 people are going to keep you off the street, you’re delusional. So yah. I get it. Follow the CBA. But I think we can get a little more creative when it comes to mitigating furloughs other than offering just over 1% early retirement. Maybe drop that number to 60 or look at how they can come up with a reasonable % vs and age range. |
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3019507)
They’re doing everything they can to save money. It all adds up. If you have any better ideas, the company is literally asking for your suggestions. So tell them.
Like posted above, read YOUR CBA. Maybe start paying attention to Section 23. |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019518)
What’s a furlough?
Get off your high horse bub. And yes this is identical to what AA offered to their employees. You think 68 people are going to keep you off the street, you’re delusional. So yah. I get it. Follow the CBA. But I think we can get a little more creative when it comes to mitigating furloughs other than offering just over 1% early retirement. Maybe drop that number to 60 or look at how they can come up with a reasonable % vs and age range. You think they’re gonna pay pilots at the top of the pay scale FIVE YEARS of 50 hour credit lines to do nothing in order to save a few furloughs?? You’re the delusional one. They are following the CBA. They are going to do what they believe is best for the COMPANY. Not the individual pilots. |
Originally Posted by hyperboy
(Post 3019500)
Read your contract our CBA it's different that AA CBA. What does AA even have to do with us? Knowledge is power. It's called furlough mitigation. They are following the contract.
|
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019519)
No, it’s not everything they can to save money.
Like posted above, read YOUR CBA. Maybe start paying attention to Section 23. I wonder why we skipped over that part of whatever section 23 is, and maybe whatever rsv periods means and maybe whatever that part time award thing means. So yeah they are stepping over dollars to pick up pennies. They are not doing EVERYTHING they can to save money. It also says something about it not being limited to whatever section 23 is. So maybe stop the individual greed. 0 hours/50 hours/75 hours. Open time is blocked or not blocked but everyone is capped at 75 hours. No VDA no Prem. 35 hours part time lines. So either our cash flow problem hasn’t been that dire or maybe we all should expect to be on the street. |
Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
(Post 3019504)
JMO, They should have offered it to anyone with 10 or 12 years or more on property with an irrevocable letter of resignation to be paid out for 24 months at 50hrs.
I think they'd have a lot more offers to bounce out. |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019520)
They literally employee folks with advanced mathematics degrees. You think they haven’t done the math?
You think they’re gonna pay pilots at the top of the pay scale FIVE YEARS of 50 hour credit lines to do nothing in order to save a few furloughs?? You’re the delusional one. They are following the CBA. They are going to do what they believe is best for the COMPANY. Not the individual pilots. |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019529)
lol dude. You comment about how they are not doing everything to save money, then attack me for saying that the early retirement isn’t enough???? My minds blown
And I must say, your mind is blown pretty easily. That or you just have really poor reading comprehension or the ability to grasp the obvious. For your sake, and to ensure I'm not attacking you, I'll succinctly rephrase my opinion on what is happening: The company is not doing everything they can to save money, with particular emphasis on how/what they offering pilots. This is intentional, as they are simply checking the boxes of Section 23. This enables them the ability to furlough. THAT is ultimately the way they will save the most money. /end of attack |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019527)
Maybe credit caps to start. Amazing how many VDAS and prem trips went out last month. People crediting over 150 hours while reserves stayed at home.
|
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019545)
I'm sorry, you feel personally attacked? Wow, how hurtful that must have been when I said they are following the contract. Do we have an APC safe space we can have you sit in for a while. I'd hate to further "attack" you for simply posting my opinions.
And I must say, your mind is blown pretty easily. That or you just have really poor reading comprehension or the ability to grasp the obvious. For your sake, and to ensure I'm not attacking you, I'll succinctly rephrase my opinion on what is happening: The company is not doing everything they can to save money, with particular emphasis on how/what they offering pilots. This is intentional, as they are simply checking the boxes of Section 23. This enables them the ability to furlough. THAT is ultimately the way they will save the most money. /end of attack So, basically you still agree that not enough is being done? |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019561)
lol
So, basically you still agree that not enough is being done? And that it's purposeful. And that they aren't going to do more. They are going to follow the CBA. Believe me, I don't want to be furloughed (again). If you have some wonderful ideas, they are currently appealing to you to tell them. |
So pretty much $160,000/yr to F off. I’d be in in a second. Only 20 yrs off.
|
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019519)
No, it’s not everything they can to save money.
Like posted above, read YOUR CBA. Maybe start paying attention to Section 23. |
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3019591)
Yea ok buddy. The company is desperate to save money every every way they can. If you find something in the CBA that would help reduce costs, make the MEC aware of it. Make the company aware of it instead of trying to be an APC hero.
And I hope I'm wrong. |
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019527)
Maybe credit caps to start. Amazing how many VDAS and prem trips went out last month. People crediting over 150 hours while reserves stayed at home.
I wonder why we skipped over that part of whatever section 23 is, and maybe whatever rsv periods means and maybe whatever that part time award thing means. So yeah they are stepping over dollars to pick up pennies. They are not doing EVERYTHING they can to save money. It also says something about it not being limited to whatever section 23 is. So maybe stop the individual greed. 0 hours/50 hours/75 hours. Open time is blocked or not blocked but everyone is capped at 75 hours. No VDA no Prem. 35 hours part time lines. So either our cash flow problem hasn’t been that dire or maybe we all should expect to be on the street. |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3019595)
The last thing I am trying to be is an "APC hero". Im just saying the company is following the CBA. And they are doing that so that they can furlough per the CBA. Again, my opinion.
And I hope I'm wrong. |
Originally Posted by hyperboy
(Post 3019600)
High horse? Felt why are you giving concessions? You don't get it. We have a contract. They have plenty of money they can save within the confines of this contract and running more efficiently. This contract was smartly built with good times and bad times in mind. How about you just fly airplanes and not give away the farm....for nothing...
|
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019527)
Maybe credit caps to start. Amazing how many VDAS and prem trips went out last month. People crediting over 150 hours while reserves stayed at home.
I wonder why we skipped over that part of whatever section 23 is, and maybe whatever rsv periods means and maybe whatever that part time award thing means. So yeah they are stepping over dollars to pick up pennies. They are not doing EVERYTHING they can to save money. It also says something about it not being limited to whatever section 23 is. So maybe stop the individual greed. 0 hours/50 hours/75 hours. Open time is blocked or not blocked but everyone is capped at 75 hours. No VDA no Prem. 35 hours part time lines. So either our cash flow problem hasn’t been that dire or maybe we all should expect to be on the street. PLEASE REMAIN CALM. |
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3019560)
Thats why I’m afraid that a Jetblue pilot furloughed will be spending a long time on the sidelines.
|
Loa 9
The list in section 23 isn’t in order. It’s basically suggestions and actually leaves more options available than just what’s written.
We aren’t even close to furloughs yet. Reduced alv and credit caps next if they are even needed. The company is still thinking this all ends by late summer and demand returns to a reasonable level. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3019797)
The list in section 23 isn’t in order. It’s basically suggestions and actually leaves more options available than just what’s written.
We aren’t even close to furloughs yet. Reduced alv and credit caps next if they are even needed. The company is still thinking this all ends by late summer and demand returns to a reasonable level. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Phil Laschio
(Post 3019830)
I really wanted the E190 CA VIL for April but they only awarded 5. My gut vibe said this thing peaks and stalls by the end of April and we’re scaling back up after that. Big issue is going to be commuting in May it seems. I don’t want to have to show 2 days early. Guess I’ll bid the May VIL but I’m bottom 25% so unlikely to get it.
|
Originally Posted by Phil Laschio
(Post 3019830)
I really wanted the E190 CA VIL for April but they only awarded 5. My gut vibe said this thing peaks and stalls by the end of April and we’re scaling back up after that. Big issue is going to be commuting in May it seems. I don’t want to have to show 2 days early. Guess I’ll bid the May VIL but I’m bottom 25% so unlikely to get it.
|
Originally Posted by WhistlePig
(Post 3019796)
If anyone is picking up extra flying while pilots are on the street, they have a very punchable face.
|
Originally Posted by feltf4
(Post 3019527)
Maybe credit caps to start. Amazing how many VDAS and prem trips went out last month. People crediting over 150 hours while reserves stayed at home.
I wonder why we skipped over that part of whatever section 23 is, and maybe whatever rsv periods means and maybe whatever that part time award thing means. So yeah they are stepping over dollars to pick up pennies. They are not doing EVERYTHING they can to save money. It also says something about it not being limited to whatever section 23 is. So maybe stop the individual greed. 0 hours/50 hours/75 hours. Open time is blocked or not blocked but everyone is capped at 75 hours. No VDA no Prem. 35 hours part time lines. So either our cash flow problem hasn’t been that dire or maybe we all should expect to be on the street. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands