Naughty naughty....
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,209
If the fuel hadn't been donated and the pilots weren't volunteering their time (which wasn't widely known at first) I could see it as a waste given the company is trying to conserve cash. IMO most pilots wouldn't understand the mixed message. Even those who didn't "approve" of the flyby wouldn't dissaprove on the grounds that AOC stated. That it burns fuel (pollutes) over vulnerable communities. That's just a silly reason but par for the course in AOC-speak.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
If the fuel hadn't been donated and the pilots weren't volunteering their time (which wasn't widely known at first) I could see it as a waste given the company is trying to conserve cash. IMO most pilots wouldn't understand the mixed message. Even those who didn't "approve" of the flyby wouldn't dissaprove on the grounds that AOC stated. That it burns fuel (pollutes) over vulnerable communities. That's just a silly reason but par for the course in AOC-speak.
right.
so if we use her logic is there any community it would be fine to pollute over? (I bet I know the answer)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post