![]() |
Why do I get the feeling that as usual the company is going to have the train wreck that usually happens when they do…well…really anything in that they are going to send 190s to the beer can factory and the 220s will be delayed again?
|
Still only 12 A220’s and 1 of them is parked.
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways the 220’s are very delayed |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3511391)
Still only 12 A220’s and 1 of them is parked.
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways the 220’s are very delayed |
Originally Posted by SaintNick
(Post 3511432)
why is one parked?
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3511355)
1. How many currently out of service?
2. Yes, most of them are flying right now, as are most of the E190s. So if you start parking more E190s without taking more A220s, from this point, then block hours/ASMs will shrink. If you're already flying all the current A220s, and all the current E190s, you can't park a bunch of E190s and only take a few more A220s without reducing the schedule. Also as much as the 220s are delayed, we will probably get 1 or 2 more by the end of the year. |
Originally Posted by SaintNick
(Post 3511432)
why is one parked?
That’s just the way plane spotter reports it if it hasn’t moved in a few days. It’s flying tomorrow though Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle. |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3511533)
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle. |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3511533)
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle. Not at the moment. I think Swiss was having some engine issues and needed a software update a few years ago. Altitude limitation is 41,000ft. |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3511533)
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands