Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
Blue horseshoe loves Bluestar Airliines >

Blue horseshoe loves Bluestar Airliines

Search
Notices

Blue horseshoe loves Bluestar Airliines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2024, 07:49 AM
  #71  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,973
Default

Originally Posted by MergingTargets View Post
Maybe we should buy the shares before he does. Keep Jetblue My Jetblue?
Planning on buying most of the shares? He does not even have to buy 51% to make things happen.

Icahn can go in the revolving door behind you and come out ahead of you.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 10:31 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 531
Default

[QUOTE This is what Icahn wrote to his shareholders just last year:

"Even when a shareholder wages and wins an activist campaign, boards can be so entrenched that it can take years to implement the needed changes and unlock the value and/or hidden jewel. HOWEVER, WHEN AN ACTIVIST IS SUCCESSFUL IN CHANGING THE BOARD OR THE CEO, GREAT VALUE CAN BE UNLOCKED FOR ALL SHAREHOLDERS AND THIS IS WHY OUR RECORD OVER THE LAST 23 YEARS HAS BEEN SO IMPRESSIVE."[/QUOTE]

So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 10:39 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right View Post
[QUOTE This is what Icahn wrote to his shareholders just last year:

[i]"Even when a shareholder wages and wins an activist campaign, boards can be so entrenched that it can take years to implement the needed changes and unlock the value and/or hidden jewel. HOWEVER, WHEN AN ACTIVIST IS SUCCESSFUL IN CHANGING THE BOARD OR THE CEO, GREAT VALUE CAN BE UNLOCKED FOR ALL SHAREHOLDERS AND THIS IS WHY OUR RECORD OVER THE LAST 23 YEARS HAS BEEN SO IMPRESSIVE."
So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.[/QUOTE]

Good thoughts, hope it happens!
gottagetout is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 10:41 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by gottagetout View Post
So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.
Good thoughts, hope it happens![/QUOTE]


we couldn’t even combine a crappy airline with a crappier airline. I don’t think 3 crappy airlines are going to have a chance.
Wasntme is online now  
Old 02-15-2024, 10:49 AM
  #75  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,600
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right View Post
This is what Icahn wrote to his shareholders just last year:

[i]"Even when a shareholder wages and wins an activist campaign, boards can be so entrenched that it can take years to implement the needed changes and unlock the value and/or hidden jewel. HOWEVER, WHEN AN ACTIVIST IS SUCCESSFUL IN CHANGING THE BOARD OR THE CEO, GREAT VALUE CAN BE UNLOCKED FOR ALL SHAREHOLDERS AND THIS IS WHY OUR RECORD OVER THE LAST 23 YEARS HAS BEEN SO IMPRESSIVE."
So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.
I like the idea, the problem is AS/HA are already moving along in the merger process. The DOJ has submitted requests for information, and the shareholder vote is tomorrow I believe. I don't see how JB can jump into that agreement. Maybe in 3yrs when AS/HA have sorted it out, but I dont see this as possible anytime soon.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 11:31 AM
  #76  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2024
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by gottagetout View Post
So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.
Good thoughts, hope it happens![/QUOTE]

the B6/NK merger wasnt shot down because of antitrust reasons. It was shut down because the big 4 lobbied hard to keep their 80% market share. Future mergers that make sense will be shut down for the same reason. stop trying to be reasonable and open your eyes to the corruption.
loudclouds is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 11:38 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
I like the idea, the problem is AS/HA are already moving along in the merger process. The DOJ has submitted requests for information, and the shareholder vote is tomorrow I believe. I don't see how JB can jump into that agreement. Maybe in 3yrs when AS/HA have sorted it out, but I dont see this as possible anytime soon.
This idea is a long-term view, probably 3-5 years or more, after ALK + HA, and after a new DOJ and new pro-business administration. Assuming of course the current administration is voted out.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 11:53 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 105
Default Your naive

Originally Posted by Clear Right View Post
[QUOTE This is what Icahn wrote to his shareholders just last year:

[i]"Even when a shareholder wages and wins an activist campaign, boards can be so entrenched that it can take years to implement the needed changes and unlock the value and/or hidden jewel. HOWEVER, WHEN AN ACTIVIST IS SUCCESSFUL IN CHANGING THE BOARD OR THE CEO, GREAT VALUE CAN BE UNLOCKED FOR ALL SHAREHOLDERS AND THIS IS WHY OUR RECORD OVER THE LAST 23 YEARS HAS BEEN SO IMPRESSIVE."
So let’s take this idea in a different direction.

Icahn bought his stock for an Average of $3.56 per share. How do you create an Airline that can instantly compete with DL, UA, and AA? The answer is pretty easy, you force a Merger/Acquisition with ALK, HA, and B6.

The problem is, you can’t get the 3xCEOs and 3xBODs to agree on who is in charge and which “Brand” survives. ALK and HA can’t even agree on a combined Brand, so they’re gonna operate semi-separate. The 3 combined have the premium product, fleet diversity and assets/real estate in east/west coast big cities, pacific and europe access to have the capacity and customer base to truly compete with Big 3. Again problem being, you gotta convince a couple the CEOs and BODs of ALK, HA and B6 to potentially give up their jobs/seats.

Oh, and by the way, the 3 combined is probably a $30+ stock, that’s 10x return on his $3.56/share investment. All under a future pro-business administration after the election.

Just a crazy theory & contrarian opinion. The execution of the theory is the journey.[/QUOTE]





Icahn is a corporate raider. He does what he does. Pumps up a stock, pays dividends to himself and rapes a company in the process
good Luck, you all are going to need it
Flyhigh44 is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 12:05 PM
  #79  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,600
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right View Post
This idea is a long-term view, probably 3-5 years or more, after ALK + HA, and after a new DOJ and new pro-business administration. Assuming of course the current administration is voted out.
I do think that is likely in a 3-5yr timeframe. In the meantime look for us to reduce any sort of overlap/competition with AS. May God have mercy on our souls for the SLI.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 12:44 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
I do think that is likely in a 3-5yr timeframe. In the meantime look for us to reduce any sort of overlap/competition with AS. May God have mercy on our souls for the SLI.
I understand the SLI concern with AS, but if you’re an East Coast guy, do you really think the result would be that bad? I doubt a lot of senior AS guys are looking to move out of the Pacific NW. Sure, overall seniority would take a hit, but I’m not so sure about in-base seniority for East Coast domiciles.
PSU Flyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
vagabond
Safety
29
06-20-2011 09:05 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-30-2009 03:56 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
08-03-2007 07:25 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
08-03-2006 06:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices