![]() |
so why do they keep pretending to have interest in a LAS base? Even after the spirit denial, they claim it would make sense.
|
Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
(Post 3786237)
so why do they keep pretending to have interest in a LAS base? Even after the spirit denial, they claim it would make sense.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3786238)
I haven’t heard any LAS talk since the merger died. Where did you hear them talk about it? Recurrent lunch?
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3786238)
I haven’t heard any LAS talk since the merger died. Where did you hear them talk about it? Recurrent lunch?
|
Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
(Post 3786240)
Mostly the company pocket sessions. It sounds like LAS is still very much in play.
I learned quickly they only give postive information.......thats understandable .....it's just that they are lying most of the time. |
Originally Posted by 11atsomto
(Post 3786246)
Did they talk about the LAX reduction too in those pocketcasts or whatever they are called.
I learned quickly they only give postive information.......thats understandable .....it's just that they are lying most of the time. |
Originally Posted by 11atsomto
(Post 3786246)
Did they talk about the LAX reduction too in those pocketcasts or whatever they are called.
I learned quickly they only give postive information.......thats understandable .....it's just that they are lying most of the time. |
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3786268)
I think we all get it by now….you hate Jetblue and your time there. United is awesome, except in the eyes of the FAA….but other than them.
I wonder why he is even posting here. I haven’t posted in the air Wisconsin forum for like 12 years, you know since I left. |
Originally Posted by knewyork
(Post 3786262)
It’s quite an exaggeration to say they lie most of the time. I listen to most of the pocket sessions. Many times they mention something that is later confirmed by company actions. They said the short haul LAX flying was unprofitable. That’s not very positive. So they’re getting rid of it. And they said SJU flying is very profitable and we’re going to add flights. So a base makes sense then.
the biggest lie I heard in that pocket session was saying that a full plane doesn’t mean it’ll make money. Really? So we are selling every seat for what? So we lose money? Isn’t it better to have a lighter plane at higher prices? We are also capping flights that have never been capped for years. The plane gets full to the cap, so why limit the sale of more seats? Again in a flight that has never been capped. Something smells fishy. |
Originally Posted by KNOTAPILOT
(Post 3786323)
the biggest lie I heard in that pocket session was saying that a full plane doesn’t mean it’ll make money. Really? So we are selling every seat for what? So we lose money? Isn’t it better to have a lighter plane at higher prices?
We are also capping flights that have never been capped for years. The plane gets full to the cap, so why limit the sale of more seats? Again in a flight that has never been capped. Something smells fishy. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands