![]() |
Originally Posted by CareerPivot
(Post 3866269)
For those that didn't see it... what was it?
All from wakeman at recurrent this week-
-growing by mid next year, biggest JetBlue has ever been as the previously to be retired 320's are sticking around now and after 190's gone we net positive aircraft Spark notes |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3866273)
All from wakeman at recurrent this week-
-growing by mid next year, biggest JetBlue has ever been as the previously to be retired 320's are sticking around now and after 190's gone we net positive aircraft Spark notes Also he’s about 8 levels below anyone who would actually have knowledge of any talks. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3866404)
All of the Alaska stuff has already been denied by wakeman himself. He says he never said it.
Also he’s about 8 levels below anyone who would actually have knowledge of any talks. |
Those in the know are not at liberty to talk about a merger. And the group who knows is very small.
You have to wonder who typed this info and credited it to a specific individual. It’s weird behavior with little to gain from it. |
Originally Posted by knewyork
(Post 3866415)
Those in the know are not at liberty to talk about a merger. And the group who knows is very small.
You have to wonder who typed this info and credited it to a specific individual. It’s weird behavior with little to gain from it. |
My speculation based on previous experience at the recurrent lunches:
Mgmt: What questions do you have for me? Pilot: Are we merging with Alaska? Mgmt: Look, you know, I'll find out when I see it in the news, the same time you guys do. But, I mean, it would make sense. We are relatively cheap right now and combined, we could be a strong competitor. Pilot: If it did happen, when would it happen? Mgmt: I really couldn't say, it's just speculation. Pilot: But, could it happen soon? Like next year? Mgmt: In theory, I guess they could call any time. And someone jots down the notes and spreads the "news." |
Originally Posted by todd1200
(Post 3866454)
My speculation based on previous experience at the recurrent lunches:
Mgmt: What questions do you have for me? Pilot: Are we merging with Alaska? Mgmt: Look, you know, I'll find out when I see it in the news, the same time you guys do. But, I mean, it would make sense. We are relatively cheap right now and combined, we could be a strong competitor. Pilot: If it did happen, when would it happen? Mgmt: I really couldn't say, it's just speculation. Pilot: But, could it happen soon? Like next year? Mgmt: In theory, I guess they could call any time. And someone jots down the notes and spreads the "news." |
I just don't see how Alaska could possibly be talking about another merger when they currently have their hands full. If someone does decide to merge with or acquire JetBlue, they have 4 years to get it done. The clock starts soon.
|
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3866523)
I just don't see how Alaska could possibly be talking about another merger when they currently have their hands full. If someone does decide to merge with or acquire JetBlue, they have 4 years to get it done. The clock starts soon.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3866273)
All from wakeman at recurrent this week-
-growing by mid next year, biggest JetBlue has ever been as the previously to be retired 320's are sticking around now and after 190's gone we net positive aircraft Spark notes I dont know why people feel the need to make up misinformation. Does no one any good. |
Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
(Post 3868921)
I was in this recurrent. None of this was ever said. Especially not about Alaska, Alaska relative to Spirit, Pratt, the early outs...
I dont know why people feel the need to make up misinformation. Does no one any good. |
Originally Posted by Supermid
(Post 3868939)
It follows the maturity and emotional intelligence levels of high schoolers.
|
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 3866539)
If it is AS I think they could do it under any administration. Only thing imho that would push things up is if (IF) jet forward actually works, we woukd be much more expensive.
As far as I can tell, Jet Forward is a focus on basic operational management which they should have been doing the entire time. There's nothing novel about it, beyond the name. Yes, it seems to be helping some, but I'm still waiting for them to present a coherent "Plan B." There's is no vision, it's a stay afloat strategy with a sprinkle of wishful thinking until something external changes our circumstances. |
Originally Posted by GrayFlyer
(Post 3869967)
Please define "Jet Forward" for us. What is it you think they're accomplishing out of the ordinary which would make an investor spend "much much more." I would love to know that it's something more, but I fear you're overly optimistic.
As far as I can tell, Jet Forward is a focus on basic operational management which they should have been doing the entire time. There's nothing novel about it, beyond the name. Yes, it seems to be helping some, but I'm still waiting for them to present a coherent "Plan B." There's is no vision, it's a stay afloat strategy with a sprinkle of wishful thinking until something external changes our circumstances. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/s...:JBLU:ULCC:AAL Basic operation focus, reshuffle to east coast leisure network, get rid of uneconomic planes (190s), enhance product (first class, lounges). This should hopefully get us to some stable profits and we get a good valuation in a merger. |
Since we’re on the topic of both airlines look up “Alaska Accelerate” and compare it to “JetForward.”
|
I think merger/acquisition is the only play left. We have no fortress hubs that allows us to control pricing, and always turn out a profit from. We are always one Hurricane away from wiping out an entire qtrs profits, when it tracks practically through every base we have. We’ll never be able to get to the margins that the big 4-5 have. Everyone has caught up or surpassed our product as of late. Back in the day, wifi and TV’s were a hot commodity, now it’s the norm. With out any business contracts, cargo, wide body premium, etc. If oil spikes, or the economy dips, there is no way we make a profit. We have no pricing power. We have all this debt to service, we dished out millions for a failed merger. This is all way above my pay grade, but I just don’t see how this continues long term without a merger.
|
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
(Post 3870105)
I think merger/acquisition is the only play left. We have no fortress hubs that allows us to control pricing, and always turn out a profit from. We are always one Hurricane away from wiping out an entire qtrs profits, when it tracks practically through every base we have. We’ll never be able to get to the margins that the big 4-5 have. Everyone has caught up or surpassed our product as of late. Back in the day, wifi and TV’s were a hot commodity, now it’s the norm. With out any business contracts, cargo, wide body premium, etc. If oil spikes, or the economy dips, there is no way we make a profit. We have no pricing power. We have all this debt to service, we dished out millions for a failed merger. This is all way above my pay grade, but I just don’t see how this continues long term without a merger.
|
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
(Post 3870105)
I think merger/acquisition is the only play left. We have no fortress hubs that allows us to control pricing, and always turn out a profit from. We are always one Hurricane away from wiping out an entire qtrs profits, when it tracks practically through every base we have. We’ll never be able to get to the margins that the big 4-5 have. Everyone has caught up or surpassed our product as of late. Back in the day, wifi and TV’s were a hot commodity, now it’s the norm. With out any business contracts, cargo, wide body premium, etc. If oil spikes, or the economy dips, there is no way we make a profit. We have no pricing power. We have all this debt to service, we dished out 100’s of millions for a failed merger. This is all way above my pay grade, but I just don’t see how this continues long term without a merger.
|
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
(Post 3870105)
I think merger/acquisition is the only play left. We have no fortress hubs that allows us to control pricing, and always turn out a profit from. We are always one Hurricane away from wiping out an entire qtrs profits, when it tracks practically through every base we have. We’ll never be able to get to the margins that the big 4-5 have. Everyone has caught up or surpassed our product as of late. Back in the day, wifi and TV’s were a hot commodity, now it’s the norm. With out any business contracts, cargo, wide body premium, etc. If oil spikes, or the economy dips, there is no way we make a profit. We have no pricing power. We have all this debt to service, we dished out millions for a failed merger. This is all way above my pay grade, but I just don’t see how this continues long term without a merger.
|
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
(Post 3870105)
We are always one Hurricane away from wiping out an entire qtrs profits, when it tracks practically through every base we have.
I was delayed this past week for over an hour on a flight for no reason, which in turn delayed the next flight. Airplane came in on time from the DR, needed to clear and get towed over from international. No weather, no "ATC issues". Just incompetence, and this stuff happens every single day. |
If a merger/aquisition IS the plan, how soon do you give til an announcement. The Clock is starting in a few days
|
Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
(Post 3870288)
If a merger/aquisition IS the plan, how soon do you give til an announcement. The Clock is starting in a few days
|
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 3870290)
Honestly I don’t think it would matter which administration. There is hardly any overlap and one isn’t god forbid a ulcc. Be hard to argue that they would harm consumers by merging(if that was to ever happen)
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3870295)
Agree with this. It would certainly be smart to get it done under this administration, but I doubt we hear anything soon. If it is AS for our future then JB is going to need to show a year of profitability and AS will need to finish sorting their HA merger. I bet 2Q 2026 at the earliest for any sort of announcement, but more likely into 2027.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3870295)
Agree with this. It would certainly be smart to get it done under this administration, but I doubt we hear anything soon. If it is AS for our future then JB is going to need to show a year of profitability and AS will need to finish sorting their HA merger. I bet 2Q 2026 at the earliest for any sort of announcement, but more likely into 2027.
|
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3870310)
A publicly traded company has to show one year of profitability before becoming a M&A target? Interesting….
Assuming a fiduciary duty to shareholders then yes JB mgmt would want to get the best price they can for a merger and show they are worth a $xx share price instead of $.01. If there was truly no prospect of turning this around then sure we would be merging on Jan 20th. Also consider the most realistic partner for us is AS, and they are busy with finishing the HA merger for at least another year or two. So what do we do in the meantime? Make ourselves look as good as possible. Moral of the story: I don't think we will see a merger in 2025. |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3870311)
C'mon man... of course not. But if you're a potential suitor would you want to merge with JBLU at a $xx valuation? Or would you want to do it under Ch11 when you can slash and burn and buy the carcass for $.01.
Assuming a fiduciary duty to shareholders then yes JB mgmt would want to get the best price they can for a merger and show they are worth a $xx share price instead of $.01. If there was truly no prospect of turning this around then sure we would be merging on Jan 20th. Also consider the most realistic partner for us is AS, and they are busy with finishing the HA merger for at least another year or two. So what do we do in the meantime? Make ourselves look as good as possible. Moral of the story: I don't think we will see a merger in 2025. I don’t know it’s what you said, just like the shares Carl Icahn were selling. (kidding). JetBlue might want the best price, but I think they have to be realistic as well. Definitely don’t think it’ll be in 2025 like you said, or maybe never. |
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3870318)
I don’t know it’s what you said, just like the shares Carl Icahn were selling. (kidding). JetBlue might want the best price, but I think they have to be realistic as well. Definitely don’t think it’ll be in 2025 like you said, or maybe never.
Yes you're right, there's a real chance we dont ever merge with anyone either. None of us know the future but we're all here to speculate and try to find a glimmer of hope. |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3870322)
Ooof, Icahn's shares. Man youre really peeing all over my cheerios today.
Yes you're right, there's a real chance we dont ever merge with anyone either. None of us know the future but we're all here to speculate and try to find a glimmer of hope. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3870484)
you sure a merger is a glimmer of hope? I would tell you a glimmer of hope is a company standing on its own.
|
Originally Posted by Supermid
(Post 3870307)
2025 is the shoot par or bust year folks, they've been saying it in every town hall podcast whatever they are called.
|
Originally Posted by MergingTargets
(Post 3870523)
Not anymore. Latest communique says we do not expect to be profitable in 2025.
|
Got some 2026 LEAPS just in case
I think it will be in the cards. Alaska |
Originally Posted by ridinhigh
(Post 3870585)
Got some 2026 LEAPS just in case
I think it will be in the cards. Alaska |
Originally Posted by Supermid
(Post 3870553)
I said par as in what Geraghty said “our revenue needs to cover our operating expenses.” She didn’t say profitable.
|
Originally Posted by MergingTargets
(Post 3870597)
Last I’d heard we were expecting breakeven in 2025, no?
“In 2025, we expect to have a positive operating profit but still be unprofitable overall.” From her weekly update email. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3870653)
“In 2025, we expect to have a positive operating profit but still be unprofitable overall.”
From her weekly update email. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3870653)
“In 2025, we expect to have a positive operating profit but still be unprofitable overall.”
From her weekly update email. In other words if it weren't for all the debt strangling us at 7%+ interest we would be profitable. Meanwhile Delta just reported 12% operating margins. |
Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer
(Post 3870667)
In other words if it weren't for all the debt strangling us at 7%+ interest we would be profitable.
Meanwhile Delta just reported 12% operating margins. Spirit was known for. Now if you were to sign up for a credit card would you take a hard inquiry to sign up for TrueBlue, where one will always have to go through JFK or BOS or for a legacy card with lounge access and a global network. |
I'm too lazy to look it up but does anyone have any idea how much the legacies make off their credit cards vs everything else? If for example airline credit cards were banned tomorrow, would the big 3 still show profit?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands