Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
Page 5 of 10
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Kalitta Companies (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/kalitta-companies/)
-   -   Kalitta Air B-747 goes off the runway! (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/kalitta-companies/26697-kalitta-air-b-747-goes-off-runway.html)

longhauler 05-26-2008 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OOTSK (Post 390857)
I believe that was the bird with the "R" engines. That's too bad, it was a great flying airplane.

I wish the crew a speedy recovery and hope everything turns out well for them!

Fly Good!

704 was Q powered, 700 is the R powered bird

Coopspeed 05-26-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot (Post 391038)

Bottom line is that Kalitta and other carriers that are operating such antiques will be faced with these or maybe even worst kind of disasters and they just need to overhaul their fleets.

I highly doubt that aircraft age had anything to do with this accident. Wait for the report.

31wins 05-26-2008 05:04 PM

704 is (was at least when it came to Kalitta) R powered.

The last CD I have has the relevant differences in Vol I, FOB 5-21

Flew it 35 times

vikingpilot 05-26-2008 05:43 PM

Normy
 
Hi Normy....can you email me at [email protected] know each other from a previous 72 outfit.

longhauler 05-26-2008 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 31wins (Post 391223)
704 is (was at least when it came to Kalitta) R powered.

The last CD I have has the relevant differences in Vol I, FOB 5-21

Flew it 35 times

I just check the AOM II in differences and they listed 704 as a Q powered aircraft.

742Dash 05-26-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot (Post 390727)
well thats what happens when you fly old dinosaurs:(those aircrafts belong in the museum and should not be flying.Maybe Kalitta needs to invest some money in A380s:)
atleast the crew came out alright from this scary ordeal,wish em all the best.

My guess is that the only seat you have occupied in a 74 had a letter after it.

31wins 05-27-2008 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by longhauler (Post 391263)
I just check the AOM II in differences and they listed 704 as a Q powered aircraft.

Well they must have swapped them from the Rs it came with. That's too bad it was nice with the Rs.

Anyone remember how fun it was doing those "mandatory" max power takeoffs out of Newark and trying to level at 2500' with that thing empty?

That was a treat

GIANT PILOT 05-27-2008 03:57 AM

Rto???
 
After looking at all the pictures, it does not appear that the thrust reversers were deployed, was this an RTO?

longhauler 05-27-2008 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 31wins (Post 391372)
Well they must have swapped them from the Rs it came with. That's too bad it was nice with the Rs.

Anyone remember how fun it was doing those "mandatory" max power takeoffs out of Newark and trying to level at 2500' with that thing empty?

That was a treat

R's are nice, I left LAX with an empty AC going to ANC with R's and it was fun.

freightdawg 05-27-2008 04:24 AM

704 was -R powered until the summer of 2006, when we had a debacle in Bahrain where an engine was compressor stalling when run up for takeoff. Due to a lack of spares and the difficulty of supporting only one aircraft with those engines, it was converted back to -Q engines that summer. Thus, the difference in AOMs.

She WAS the queen of the fleet - but oh, well.

FD


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 AM.
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
Page 5 of 10
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands