Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

737 vs 757

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2019 | 01:02 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default 737 vs 757

I have flown neither. But have always been impressed by the 757 because of its versatility and can't understand why Boeing keeps building bigger 737s while retiring the 757. Could someone who has flow both educate me.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 01:12 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 17
Default

Airlines stopped buying the 757 so they stopped building it.

/thread.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 01:53 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

I was hoping that someone who had actually flown the two airplanes would answer.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:00 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 4
Default

The 757 is bigger and heavier. It can't compete on efficiency with the stretch 737s. The 757s one advantage is performance but most routes don't require more than what the 737 can provide.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:01 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 501
Default

Originally Posted by pooch817
I was hoping that someone who had actually flown the two airplanes would answer.
It has nothing to do with how they fly or how people who have flown both feel about it. It’s just numbers, and the 737 is more financially compelling than the lord’s chariot.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:06 PM
  #6  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,863
Likes: 132
Default

Originally Posted by pooch817
I was hoping that someone who had actually flown the two airplanes would answer.
That actually doesn't matter. A pilots perspective on an aircraft does not factor into its success.

The real answer is the 757 cost a lot more to make. The 757 was designed with a pre-deregulation mindset. Simply put, the 757 was over engineered. They put big engines on a large wing and gave it extra wheels with a lot of brakes. That increased the purchase price while decreasing the CASM. The 757 was a very expensive narrow body when it came out. The only reason it is popular with airlines today is because they can buy them used.

Also, most airlines don't need to use all of its capabilities. The 757 is the clear winner over the 737 if you want to carry 180ish people a long distance at a high altitude using short runways. Most of the time the runways are long enough, the flights are short enough, or you don't need to fly that high. While the 757 can do the job better, most of the time the 737 is good enough.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:08 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Well. Its a tie for most miserable jumpseat in the industry.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:13 PM
  #8  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,863
Likes: 132
Default

^Are you serious? The 757 is miles ahead of the 737 jumpseat. You get a real seat, there is actual room in the cockpit, and if there is a second jumpseat in the 757, it is actually usable. I have also heard that some people have even figured out a recline mode in the 757
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:32 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
That actually doesn't matter. A pilots perspective on an aircraft does not factor into its success.

The real answer is the 757 cost a lot more to make. The 757 was designed with a pre-deregulation mindset. Simply put, the 757 was over engineered. They put big engines on a large wing and gave it extra wheels with a lot of brakes. That increased the purchase price while decreasing the CASM. The 757 was a very expensive narrow body when it came out. The only reason it is popular with airlines today is because they can buy them used.

Also, most airlines don't need to use all of its capabilities. The 757 is the clear winner over the 737 if you want to carry 180ish people a long distance at a high altitude using short runways. Most of the time the runways are long enough, the flights are short enough, or you don't need to fly that high. While the 757 can do the job better, most of the time the 737 is good enough.
So basically the 757 is over designed for todays market. But isn't the 737 max line of aircraft in the same market as the 757? Traditionally longer routes were flown to big city airports where they have long runways. But the congestion of those airfields is making it more economical to go into a smaller airfield . SNA comes to mind.
Reply
Old 05-09-2019 | 02:34 PM
  #10  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by pooch817
I was hoping that someone who had actually flown the two airplanes would answer.

Ive got a lot time in both. That is irrelevant to why the 757 is no longer in production.



The 757 is one of the nicest handling best performing transport category jets ever built. The 737 is not. The almighty dollar is what matters here and the 757 is not an efficient airplane from a business standpoint.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TwinkiePilot
United
11
10-31-2016 04:14 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM
Lowtimer77
Hangar Talk
3
02-12-2007 01:32 AM
SWAjet
Major
2
07-22-2005 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices