737 vs 757
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
I have flown neither. But have always been impressed by the 757 because of its versatility and can't understand why Boeing keeps building bigger 737s while retiring the 757. Could someone who has flow both educate me.
#5
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 501
#6
The real answer is the 757 cost a lot more to make. The 757 was designed with a pre-deregulation mindset. Simply put, the 757 was over engineered. They put big engines on a large wing and gave it extra wheels with a lot of brakes. That increased the purchase price while decreasing the CASM. The 757 was a very expensive narrow body when it came out. The only reason it is popular with airlines today is because they can buy them used.
Also, most airlines don't need to use all of its capabilities. The 757 is the clear winner over the 737 if you want to carry 180ish people a long distance at a high altitude using short runways. Most of the time the runways are long enough, the flights are short enough, or you don't need to fly that high. While the 757 can do the job better, most of the time the 737 is good enough.
#8
^Are you serious? The 757 is miles ahead of the 737 jumpseat. You get a real seat, there is actual room in the cockpit, and if there is a second jumpseat in the 757, it is actually usable. I have also heard that some people have even figured out a recline mode in the 757
#9
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
That actually doesn't matter. A pilots perspective on an aircraft does not factor into its success.
The real answer is the 757 cost a lot more to make. The 757 was designed with a pre-deregulation mindset. Simply put, the 757 was over engineered. They put big engines on a large wing and gave it extra wheels with a lot of brakes. That increased the purchase price while decreasing the CASM. The 757 was a very expensive narrow body when it came out. The only reason it is popular with airlines today is because they can buy them used.
Also, most airlines don't need to use all of its capabilities. The 757 is the clear winner over the 737 if you want to carry 180ish people a long distance at a high altitude using short runways. Most of the time the runways are long enough, the flights are short enough, or you don't need to fly that high. While the 757 can do the job better, most of the time the 737 is good enough.
The real answer is the 757 cost a lot more to make. The 757 was designed with a pre-deregulation mindset. Simply put, the 757 was over engineered. They put big engines on a large wing and gave it extra wheels with a lot of brakes. That increased the purchase price while decreasing the CASM. The 757 was a very expensive narrow body when it came out. The only reason it is popular with airlines today is because they can buy them used.
Also, most airlines don't need to use all of its capabilities. The 757 is the clear winner over the 737 if you want to carry 180ish people a long distance at a high altitude using short runways. Most of the time the runways are long enough, the flights are short enough, or you don't need to fly that high. While the 757 can do the job better, most of the time the 737 is good enough.
#10
Ive got a lot time in both. That is irrelevant to why the 757 is no longer in production.
The 757 is one of the nicest handling best performing transport category jets ever built. The 737 is not. The almighty dollar is what matters here and the 757 is not an efficient airplane from a business standpoint.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



