Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   New FAA Admin supports 1,500 HR rule (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/123109-new-faa-admin-supports-1-500-hr-rule.html)

TiredSoul 07-25-2019 04:51 AM


Originally Posted by Varsity (Post 2858537)
Yeah, lets flood the market with 250 hour wonders. That will do a ton to help wages. :rolleyes:

Let me guess, we should pay for our type ratings too? After all, they do it Europe!

News flash for ya buddy, you already do.
Compare first year pay to second and third.
That’s you paying for your training right there.
Left or right pocket.
:cool:

ESQ702 07-25-2019 05:37 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 2858873)
1500hr rule is total political BS. Sure I like it because it drives pilot wages up and limits the supply of pilots. But it's not science based whatsoever.

The 1500 hour rule reminds me of the bar exam for attorneys. It’s an artificial barrier to entry that sucks to be on the outside looking in on but nice once you’re “in the club.”

Yes a 1500 TT pilot won’t make a bundle in his first few years but neither do new attorneys. Time + experience = an increase of pay. How much of an increase depends on the pilot and attorney’s choices career choices and options available.

Taking the 1,500 hour rule back down to where it was is akin to removing the bar exam in a given state. It’ll flood the market overnight with job applicants, giving employers a ton of leverage over prospective employees.

A similar thing happened here in NV years ago with dentists. The entrance exam to practice dentistry in NV was waived if you wereaready licensed to practice in another state and a ton of dentists flooded the Vegas market, hurting business for all fast. It also drove down the quality of work performed. The waiver was rescinded a few years later because of the problems it caused (source: my father-in-law who is a Vegas dentist).

Although I’m not at 1500 TT yet I hope it doesn’t drop to 250 again.

symbian simian 07-25-2019 05:40 AM


Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 2858909)
No 4 year degree I guess for you and can’t get on with a major
Got it

Username checks out. Sit in the bushes and take potshots at people.
I fly for a major. That does not really matter. My two decades of experience on both sides of the atlantic qualify me to have an opinion.

symbian simian 07-25-2019 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2858891)
AF 447

We’re both pulling back on the stick, why aren’t we climbing?

Yes, there are people in Europe too that should not be pilots, and the pressure to use the AP in the EU is very wrong, but that doesn’t change my opinion on the 1500hrs.

captjns 07-25-2019 06:56 AM


Originally Posted by Varsity (Post 2858537)
Yeah, lets flood the market with 250 hour wonders. That will do a ton to help wages. :rolleyes:

Let me guess, we should pay for our type ratings too? After all, they do it Europe!

Negative.. FR requires a 5,000 Euro down payment with a 5 year pro-rate bond. Other Euro Lo-cost may provide similar. Housing an food are at the expense of the candidate.

captjns 07-25-2019 07:34 AM

Line Training in other lands
 
Line training is based on minimum number of sectors flown versus the traditional 25 hours in the U.S.

That said with a minimum of 80 sectors of line training can yield upwards of 200 to 250 hours of line training.

I enjoyed being a line training captain in Europe and Asia. Enthusiastic gals and guys. Steep learning curves on the majority of the new pilots. The majority of pilots from Euroland as well as other countries train in the US, Canada, NZ or Philippines due to the high cost in their home lands. The training/learning process is taken very seriously.

Most are well prepared for their assessments with their airlines’ of choice and onwards towards training. Prior to Sim training is Multi Crew Training. Sim training, conducted by a recognized ATO, is airline specific and comprehensive.

LSTs, generally, are conducted by airline specific TREs.

Then off to base training followed by numerous observation flights, prior to line training.

galaxy flyer 07-25-2019 08:54 AM

Thanks, captjns for the post. The training system outside the US is much different than here. Their 250-hour pilots are far better trained than a 250-hour FAA commercial pilot.

GF

Chris99 07-25-2019 11:24 AM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 2858756)
I think it is the same reason the military can put pilots in a fast jet with a 100 hours: they only put the people there that belong there. Screening is important and the school we got them from would do that before the bank would give you money. Just passing an ATP checkride does not qualify.

I don't think civilians want to go through a military-style pilot training in order to start flying at 250 hours. You don't know what you're asking.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk

Chris99 07-25-2019 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 2858918)
News flash for ya buddy, you already do.

Compare first year pay to second and third.

That’s you paying for your training right there.

Left or right pocket.

:cool:

The first-year pay sucked back when people had to pay for training as well. If you haven't noticed, first-year pay has been increasing since the 1500-hour rule was implemented.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk

BobZ 07-25-2019 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by Chris99 (Post 2859155)
I don't think civilians want to go through a military-style pilot training in order to start flying at 250 hours. You don't know what you're asking.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk

What you arent seeing in that military low time pilot product is the attrition process that distills the end result.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands