![]() |
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 2898274)
Well dang! You better not tell that to the guys living in Eastern PA and consider that to be living "in base" for LGA/JFK. Or any "normal" person who has 35 minute commute each way each day. :rolleyes:
|
That is like living in Orlando and being based in Miami, that’s not “living in base”.
|
Originally Posted by Floobs
(Post 2898302)
Driving 2:30-3:00 each way is not rational.
And for the record, the average American spends over 4 hours a week commuting. So 5-6 hours per week is by no means an outlier, which was your original assertion. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/study-states-with-the-longest-and-shortest-commutes.html Getting back on topic, to the OP: Go to Delta. I've yet to meet an American pilot who is happy there. That kind of low morale can really taint a career. |
Originally Posted by Floobs
(Post 2898302)
Driving 2:30-3:00 each way is not rational.
It beats commuting by plane (or living in NYC.) I have no complaints. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2898338)
My drive to JFK is in that range (sometimes longer.)
It beats commuting by plane (or living in NYC.) I have no complaints. Boom. |
Originally Posted by Floobs
(Post 2898305)
That is like living in Orlando and being based in Miami, that’s not “living in base”.
Commuting by car (one - three hours) is not living in base, but it sure beats almost any commute by air. If for no other reason than you can ALWAYS go home at the end of a trip, your car never, ever leaves without you if you're late. Driving longer than three hours would get real old real fast, unless you're in the middle of nowhere and do it all on cruise control. Also problematic for early shows, at some point you'd be leaving for work shortly after your bedtime. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 2898358)
Or just don't work for an airline with huge junior domiciles in the lovely NE. My commute is a 10 minute uber ride door to door (15 with traffic) and I live at the beach.
Boom. |
If I was offered the ability to drive 3 hours to work, I'd take it in a heartbeat. And I have a pretty good air commute as far as air commutes go.
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2898338)
My drive to JFK is in that range (sometimes longer.)
It beats commuting by plane (or living in NYC.) I have no complaints. |
Originally Posted by averageathlete
(Post 2897114)
I received job offers from both American and Delta, and I am trying to make the most educated choice I can based on my situation. My family and I would prefer to live in Charlotte, but we would also be willing to live near family in Greenville, SC.
If I choose American, I would be living in domicile in Charlotte (eventually) and have the perks associated with that. With DAL, I'd be about a 2.5 hour drive from ATL. I have heard a lot of recommendations to choose the airline that has a domicile where you want to live, but I wanted to get the answer from people who have been there with either company. I know AA also has more growth potential. Thank you for the help! Since you interviewed at both carriers, which one felt more like “home?” Did one feel more like a better fit for you than the other? I’d figure the answer out to that first and then consider the commute situation. I’m probably in the extreme minority when I say commuting does have its advantages in some situations. The biggest is if you know your family would be happier somewhere other than the base(s) your airline has. For some families it’s best not to uproot and move to base. I also believe 2-3 drive isn’t bad at all if you ultimately choose Delta. That can give you some “me” time before and after work. Good luck with your decision. GP |
I mean, just a quick browse of the recent threads in the respective sub forums would answer my question.
AA Thread 1 AA Thread 2 DL Thread 1 DL Thread 2 Dumpster fire vs Firing on all cylinders is how I see it. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2897354)
Sort of.
Depends on if it includes traffic. Not sure what DAL's reserve rules are, but that might be too far to sit reserve at a home... that's a big deal, especially at upgrade time. Many folks bypass upgrade until they can hold a line to avoid reserve, to the tune of hundreds of thousands $. A 3 hr drive would be pushing it for short call to the tune of probably wanting to find a quiet place to sit partway to Atlanta, but for the most part reserve would be at home unless actually flying. |
Clearly the answer is in your back yard, AA. Why do you have doubt???
|
I would say AA; drive to work, seniority. Delta is the better company and probably will be for awhile... but driving to work is the best.
|
Not the safest thing to fly a red eye and then jump in the car and drive 3hrs home.
|
Originally Posted by snowdawg
(Post 2899409)
Clearly the answer is in your back yard, AA. Why do you have doubt???
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2899440)
Not the safest thing to fly a red eye and then jump in the car and drive 3hrs home.
|
Originally Posted by snowdawg
(Post 2899409)
Clearly the answer is in your back yard, AA. Why do you have doubt???
|
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 2899451)
I have a buddy at AA who lives in base. Every time I talk to him he tells me he'd be gone yesterday if he could take his seniority with him.
|
Originally Posted by flyingmau5
(Post 2899584)
That's saying a lot when you can drive to work...
I’m sure there’s plenty of people who would leave their company if they could take their seniority with them. AA has its issues for sure, but the fundamentals are solid and a turn around is pretty much inevitable. The grass is always greener. |
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 2899451)
I have a buddy at AA who lives in base. Every time I talk to him he tells me he'd be gone yesterday if he could take his seniority with him.
|
Originally Posted by flyingmau5
(Post 2899584)
That's saying a lot when you can drive to work...
|
Originally Posted by GuardPolice
(Post 2899068)
Since you interviewed at both carriers, which one felt more like “home?” Did one feel more like a better fit for you than the other?
|
Delta without a question. They are in a way better financial position long term vs. AA.
|
Originally Posted by offmyrocker
(Post 2899910)
Delta without a question. They are in a way better financial position long term vs. AA.
|
Originally Posted by offmyrocker
(Post 2899910)
Delta without a question. They are in a way better financial position long term vs. AA.
There’s also better vision at Delta |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 2899930)
^^ This, plus Delta actually interviews and screens the pilots being brought in.
|
a job is a job. At the end of the day it's really just about the paycheck and time off. If you pick a company based on how much the "customers like it" then your priorities are out of wack.
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 2899996)
a job is a job. At the end of the day it's really just about the paycheck and time off. If you pick a company based on how much the "customers like it" then your priorities are out of wack.
And no, it's not just that "a job is a job." I've worked jobs where I absolutely hated going to work and ones where I enjoyed being at work. That is a tremendous difference in quality of life just based on how you feel. And that's not even touching on employee relations. You do sound like you would be right at home in AA management though. |
I’m curious where the big 3 will be in 10 years. Culture and contracts can change fairly quickly. UAL seems to have had a big culture change in the past few years. Hope AA can do the same. Forecasting a 20,30 even 40 year career with today’s information is a long shot. Like others have said... you’re in a great position.
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2900040)
The shear audacity of that statement made me laugh. You really think that the success of a company doesn't have anything to do with the customer experience and that your paycheck and time off have nothing to do with the success of a company?
And no, it's not just that "a job is a job." I've worked jobs where I absolutely hated going to work and ones where I enjoyed being at work. That is a tremendous difference in quality of life just based on how you feel. And that's not even touching on employee relations. You do sound like you would be right at home in AA management though. At the end of the day the most important things in a company and your job should be YOU. How much money will YOU make, how good of a job is it for YOU. I roll my eyes when I hear pilots whine about how disappointed they are in the "product" or something along those lines. You need to let the people who's job it is to worry that worry about that and fly the plane. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 2900704)
Re-read what I said.
At the end of the day the most important things in a company and your job should be YOU. How much money will YOU make, how good of a job is it for YOU. I roll my eyes when I hear pilots whine about how disappointed they are in the "product" or something along those lines. You need to let the people who's job it is to worry that worry about that and fly the plane. |
Not screening applicants is a surefire way to attract all the yahoos who are unhireable everywhere else. Every regional seems to have a 5-10% population of them. Cat ranchers, the people who make really mundane decisions into overly complicated messes, people who cant pass training without handholding, poor decision makers... that is not who you want to be sharing a cockpit with. Especially with a poor management culture where they are probably going to make rules to reign in the lowest common denominator. One kid poops and everyone has to wear a diaper. I would be worried about where American has been and will be sourcing your coworkers. The delta interview process wasn't fun but was definitely thorough.
|
and we don't have those problems at Delta. LOL !!!:confused:
|
Originally Posted by CaYaTeKbron
(Post 2900751)
and we don't have those problems at Delta. LOL !!!:confused:
|
I have been at AA for 18 months and I am happy here. It was my first pick due to domiciles (desire to live near DFW) and type of flying (ability to do wide body OR avoid backside of the clock flying... you can't do both!).
After 18 months, I'm 55% in base (not DFW) and holding a good line. I fly 13-15 days a month, mostly two legs a day. The captains I've flown with have, to a person, been good people and competent leaders and aviators. Training was good and I have no real complaints. Sure there are always things that could be better... and they will get better. If you spend your whole career focusing on what you DON'T like then you will never be satisfied. All that to say to the OP: don't over-think it. You will have a good career at any of these carriers. Take the first call you get and, if one offers a chance to get based where you want to live, jump on it. |
Originally Posted by Slowmover
(Post 2900785)
I have been at AA for 18 months and I am happy here. It was my first pick due to domiciles (desire to live near DFW) and type of flying (ability to do wide body OR avoid backside of the clock flying... you can't do both!).
After 18 months, I'm 55% in base (not DFW) and holding a good line. I fly 13-15 days a month, mostly two legs a day. The captains I've flown with have, to a person, been good people and competent leaders and aviators. Training was good and I have no real complaints. Sure there are always things that could be better... and they will get better. If you spend your whole career focusing on what you DON'T like then you will never be satisfied. All that to say to the OP: don't over-think it. You will have a good career at any of these carriers. Take the first call you get and, if one offers a chance to get based where you want to live, jump on it. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2900841)
I think there is a tradition of complaining and *****ing amongst AA pilots (guilty of it myself). Life is veeery good. High 20% in a senior base usually 1 or 2 legs a day (been 6+ months since a 3 leg day) making real good money. Always room for improvement but life is good.
We have a lot of Delta and SWA Fanboy’s on our internal forum, but I’m pretty sure most of them would be unhappy at DAL and especially SWA as well (SWA because AA guys want to make SWA money without working as hard as SWA pilots). |
^^^ agree with both posts above.
Just about 20 years at AA so far and life is pretty dang good. Yeah we’ve got a lot of work to do with the contract but a turnaround will happen. Finally in the left seat holding a good line driving to work in base... doesn’t get much better than that. |
Originally Posted by averageathlete
(Post 2897114)
I received job offers from both American and Delta, and I am trying to make the most educated choice I can based on my situation. My family and I would prefer to live in Charlotte, but we would also be willing to live near family in Greenville, SC.
If I choose American, I would be living in domicile in Charlotte (eventually) and have the perks associated with that. With DAL, I'd be about a 2.5 hour drive from ATL. I have heard a lot of recommendations to choose the airline that has a domicile where you want to live, but I wanted to get the answer from people who have been there with either company. I know AA also has more growth potential. Thank you for the help! 1. Is there a hyper loop to your domicile from your residence? 2. If not, then you should live in domicile at AA Optional step 3: while working at AA, buy stocks at Delta, and then it’s kind of like you are enjoying the best of both worlds. 4. Stop being average. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands