OnGuard!! please help me
I did 3 year at piedmont, 13 at skywest and now on year 4 at delta. So thats 20. I have never flown with someone that clicks over and says "you are on guard" I know people like to blame us delta guys for being guard clowns but i have not seen it. Who TF are these peeps clicking on and blasting "on guard?" You think its like 3 guys?, I know if I flew with somone here at delta that did that i would educate him/her to never do this again.
|
|
Originally Posted by BangDingOw
(Post 2946758)
I did 3 year at piedmont, 13 at skywest and now on year 4 at delta. So thats 20. I have never flown with someone that clicks over and says "you are on guard" I know people like to blame us delta guys for being guard clowns but i have not seen it. Who TF are these peeps clicking on and blasting "on guard?" You think its like 3 guys?, I know if I flew with somone here at delta that did that i would educate him/her to never do this again.
I flew with one CA when I was at the regionals who really started to go all in with it and I called him out on it then and there, but by his reaction most FOs were afraid to say anything. Regardless, it's just a matter of time until this problem is resolved. A fed on the JS told me last year that the FAA had plans for DF equipment on the center antennas so eventually they will be able to triangulate and identify the offending aircraft and violate the crew. It's starting to be viewed as a safety hazard since so many crews are turning guard down or off because of it (as well as center controllers being distracted). I'm sure they would only be able to get aircraft without another too close by, but I at least hope that it's really happening. First violated crew should shut the whole thing down really quick. |
I haven’t flown with a single person at the regionals who does this. When I flew Part 91 I knew a guy who did it though. Honestly I don’t even think it’s 121 guys most of the time.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2946792)
I haven’t flown with a single person at the regionals who does this. When I flew Part 91 I knew a guy who did it though. Honestly I don’t even think it’s 121 guys most of the time.
|
Originally Posted by Notarealpilot
(Post 2946805)
I flew with 1 or 2 PSA captains that did it but they’ve flowed to American already so we can just blame American guys now. With that said it’s usually just one or two immature guys that seem to be the vocal minority on guard.
After the first day I had to have "the talk". Dunno what the desire to tell everyone they're on guard is. I do understand if someone is accidentally transmitting repeatedly on guard giving them a heads up. |
I don’t understand the problem with saying guard. We all put ramp in the back up of 2 and forget to switch it. Some wads even say cleared to the gate. Now coming into DCA with cats and other crap is annoying. I have no problem with saying guard in a short quick fashioned like how Canada controllers reply roger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 2946807)
Had an fo at PSA who's hands moved at the speed of light to switch coms so he could yell "on guard" and then laugh hysterically.
After the first day I had to have "the talk". Dunno what the desire to tell everyone they're on guard is. I do understand if someone is accidentally transmitting repeatedly on guard giving them a heads up. |
Rarely but occasionally someone keys the mic on the wrong freq. Unintentional, and it's worth a collateral laugh. I don't mind playoff scores personally, although you can just get that from center.
The meowing is just stooopid. It was funny for about a wek after Super Troopers was released, but that was a good while ago :rolleyes: The most annoying thing is the "on guard"s, because those idiots do it when people are actually using guard for it's purpose, getting someone back on their freq or an actual emergency. I have actually heard, on two occasions, emergency GA aircraft in serious distress and people trying to help them getting stomped all over by "guard nazis". I'm certain 90% of the "guard nazis" are doing it to make people *think* someone is being anal, it cannot possibly all be DL. There are several things I like about flying in the west and not having to listen to that crap is one of them. |
Agreed.
It isn’t the actual informative ‘you’re on guard’ call. It is the childish hijinks that come after. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2946843)
Rarely but occasionally someone keys the mic on the wrong freq. Unintentional, and it's worth a collateral laugh. I don't mind playoff scores personally, although you can just get that from center.
The meowing is just stooopid. It was funny for about a wek after Super Troopers was released, but that was a good while ago :rolleyes: The most annoying thing is the "on guard"s, because those idiots do it when people are actually using guard for it's purpose, getting someone back on their freq or an actual emergency. I have actually heard, on two occasions, emergency GA aircraft in serious distress and people trying to help them getting stomped all over by "guard nazis". I'm certain 90% of the "guard nazis" are doing it to make people *think* someone is being anal, it cannot possibly all be DL. There are several things I like about flying in the west and not having to listen to that crap is one of them. |
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2946789)
Regardless, it's just a matter of time until this problem is resolved. A fed on the JS told me last year that the FAA had plans for DF equipment on the center antennas so eventually they will be able to triangulate and identify the offending aircraft and violate the crew. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2946789)
Regardless, it's just a matter of time until this problem is resolved. A fed on the JS told me last year that the FAA had plans for DF equipment on the center antennas so eventually they will be able to triangulate and identify the offending aircraft and violate the crew.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by gollum
(Post 2948709)
Yea good luck with that. The precision need to identify a specific Aircraft in a 3D environment using DF equipment is not something that really exists right now and so depending on how far from the receiving stations the aircraft is and the Length of the transmission, one would have to potentially be the only aircraft for 100 miles in any direction for them to be able to pinpoint it with any level of certainly that would hold up in court.
|
Originally Posted by gollum
(Post 2948709)
Yea good luck with that. The precision need to identify a specific Aircraft in a 3D environment using DF equipment is not something that really exists right now and so depending on how far from the receiving stations the aircraft is and the Length of the transmission, one would have to potentially be the only aircraft for 100 miles in any direction for them to be able to pinpoint it with any level of certainly that would hold up in court.
I sure hope it doesn't take until we go to digital radios to work it out. I'll also point out that the fact that the guard nonsense is only on the east coast not only helps not only support it not being mainline pilots but narrows down specific regionals as primary culprits. |
Heard a long PA on guard last month that sounded a little staged. When I landed I searched the flight number and that flight number was not being used that day ( it was a Delta flight number). So I think guys are just doing this crap in some strange attempt to troll Delta.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by gollum
(Post 2948709)
Yea good luck with that. The precision need to identify a specific Aircraft in a 3D environment using DF equipment is not something that really exists right now and so depending on how far from the receiving stations the aircraft is and the Length of the transmission, one would have to potentially be the only aircraft for 100 miles in any direction for them to be able to pinpoint it with any level of certainly that would hold up in court.
https://www.liveatc.net/archive.php So you track back to those transmissions where those aircraft have given their call sign, or previous flights those aircrew have made until you find a voice match with the guard-jamming transmissions: https://www.audioforensicexpert.com/...dentification/ With only a dozen or so possibilities, it would be very easy to determine who the actual culprit crew was/is. As for legalities: The Communications Act of 1934 Section 301 – requires persons operating or using radio transmitters to be licensed or authorized under the Commission’s rules (47 U.S.C. § 301) Section 333 – prohibits willful or malicious interference with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. Government (47 U.S.C. § 333) Section 503 – allows the FCC to impose forfeitures for willful or repeated violations of the Communications Act, the Commission’s rules, regulations or related orders, as well as for violations of the terms and conditions of any license, certificate or other Commission authorization, among other things (47 U.S.C. § 503) And seriously, do you think any major airline is going to even touch you if they find out you’ve been effin’ up an EMERGENCY frequency? Especially if the FCC pulls your radio license? Or that even a regional is going to keep you around if you are doing it with their equipment? All they have to do is nail one or two miscreants and terminate their careers and the others will start to behave. |
Originally Posted by gollum
(Post 2948709)
Yea good luck with that. The precision need to identify a specific Aircraft in a 3D environment using DF equipment is not something that really exists right now and so depending on how far from the receiving stations the aircraft is and the Length of the transmission, one would have to potentially be the only aircraft for 100 miles in any direction for them to be able to pinpoint it with any level of certainly that would hold up in court.
Only have to do it once probably, indict one moron and revoke his certs and the problem will go away. It's only a question of do they want to do it badly enough. |
Can’t pull cvrs for that.
|
Are you guys really advocating for the feds to pull CVRs? Good luck with that. Just turn down guard.
|
Originally Posted by Rooster435
(Post 2948806)
Heard a long PA on guard last month that sounded a little staged. When I landed I searched the flight number and that flight number was not being used that day ( it was a Delta flight number). So I think guys are just doing this crap in some strange attempt to troll Delta.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk We were going into PHL one day and a PA popped up on guard. We thought it was real until this dude literally hit every Delta stereotype in the book on the announcement (both pilots military, what jets they flew, how much time between them, etc) and I thought this was just a little too out there to be real. It went on for 2-3 min straight. Naturally guard had a meltdown and people were stepping all over themselves trying to mock “the Delta” crew. We had to turn it off for landing and taxiing to the gate we turned it back on and it was still a meltdown on guard. Seriously, the trolling on guard has gotten out of hand. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 2948849)
Are you guys really advocating for the feds to pull CVRs? Good luck with that. Just turn down guard.
Filler |
You think the first Guard-off of the year has already happened?
|
Probably the best way to handle guard nonsense is just not to laugh at it.
As an aside at my carrier we have a pilot who thinks it's quite droll to tell everyone its smooth when its turbulent just to mess with pax carriers. Same type of deal. |
Originally Posted by Elevation
(Post 2948930)
Probably the best way to handle guard nonsense is just not to laugh at it.
As an aside at my carrier we have a pilot who thinks it's quite droll to tell everyone its smooth when its turbulent just to mess with pax carriers. Same type of deal. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 2948849)
Are you guys really advocating for the feds to pull CVRs? Good luck with that. Just turn down guard.
The government is not required to even get a search warrant to pull up recordings on their tower, approach and departure, or center tapes - far less the commercial sites like ATCLive archived transmissions. This is the digital age. Every one of us has left an ineradicable trail of voice transmissions by the time we have an ATP and generally long before that which are almost as capable as fingerprints at identifying the perps once the total number of suspects is whittled down to a few dozen or so people. Any competent Private Investigator could do the legwork. And just based on a DF steer, anybody and their brother could look at the ADS-B and and pare the suspect list down to a dozen aircraft or less. https://i.ibb.co/Nyw98n1/5220-D78-B-...C85-B65-F4.jpg But seriously, are you trying to defend some idiots inalienable right to make an @$$ of themselves by making idiotic transmissions that interfere with appropriate use of an emergency frequency? Good luck with that. Your own management will terminate you for gross stupidity and bad PR. It would be easier to justify beating up some anonymous doctor who didn’t want to give up his seat than trying to justify meowing on an emergency channel because you were bored. |
I always laugh when someone calls ops on guard and a “go ahead” reply is heard.
What annoys me the most, is I have noticed people lately are so triggered by someone on guard that when someone is legitimately looking for a frequency on guard people are blocking him by saying “YER ON GARD!” happened last week. Some poor bastard couldn’t hear the frequency center kept repeating because some punks kept blocking it. All that said, guard stays on for pure entertainment purposes. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 2948849)
Are you guys really advocating for the feds to pull CVRs?
|
Aww you actually think that does anything? How cute.
|
Originally Posted by Sperrysan
(Post 2948844)
Can’t pull cvrs for that.
Intentionally misusing the RF spectrum is an intentional crime, it's covered by federal criminal law, not the FARs. And it doesn't matter one whit what your union contract says about it :rolleyes:
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 2948849)
Are you guys really advocating for the feds to pull CVRs? Good luck with that. Just turn down guard.
|
Originally Posted by BangDingOw
(Post 2946758)
I did 3 year at piedmont, 13 at skywest and now on year 4 at delta. So thats 20. I have never flown with someone that clicks over and says "you are on guard" I know people like to blame us delta guys for being guard clowns but i have not seen it. Who TF are these peeps clicking on and blasting "on guard?" You think its like 3 guys?, I know if I flew with somone here at delta that did that i would educate him/her to never do this again.
That’s a function of guys stroking out if number 2 isn’t on 121.5 the instant we are done with the ramp frequency. What’s the point of monitoring guard on the ground anyway? |
This could probably go on Tool of the day as well.
A captain I flew with was either sleeping half the trip, reading or just not paying much attention to his job. He always kept 121.5 on number two radio. He could be dead a sleep and as soon as someone said something on guard he popped right up and made it known they were saying it on guard. Total tool. |
I was flying a rare domestic trip four months ago. As we left EWR (notorious for what I think is punks on the ground screwing around on Guard), I heard us being called on Guard by Departure.
We had a stuck mic. First time ever in an airliner for me, although I’ve had a fair number in tactical jets. Sure enough...the glareshield mic button was stuck IN. I jiggled it and got it out; I had to break my habit pattern all the way to LAX to use the yoke button...something I had never done before. THIS is what Guard is for, and I was thankful I had it loud enough to hear (and that we weren’t saying anything embarrassing!) Ironically, it is often so bad south of EWR, that one has to turn Guard down or off because of the clowns making it a mockery. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2949101)
FAA maybe not. But FCC/FBI/DOJ investigating a crime? Sure they can. CVR is not the same kind of privileged communication as lawyer/client privilege.
Intentionally misusing the RF spectrum is an intentional crime, it's covered by federal criminal law, not the FARs. And it doesn't matter one whit what your union contract says about it :rolleyes: I like having guard up so I don't go NORDO. Don't want to do paperwork or get a private tactical airshow just so some childish dooshbags can get their jollies off. And who knows, there might be an actual emergency. I have on two occasions in the course of my career heard pilots helping another pilot in distress via guard. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands