Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Boeing NMA is DOA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/126892-boeing-nma-doa.html)

BoilerUP 01-24-2020 11:19 AM

Gate space is a factor in this as well...

A321XLR has a wingspan of 118'
737 MAX 10 has a wingspan of 118'
757-200/300 has a wingspan of 135' (winglets)
767-300 has a wingspan of 167' (winglets)
767-400/X has a wingspan of 170'
787-8/9 has a wingspan of 197'.
A330CEO has a wingspan of 198.
A330NEO has a wingspan of 210'.

Baradium 01-24-2020 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 2963129)
I've long thought that Boeing has too thin of a market for the NMA.

They have made the 737 so big (Max9 and Max10) that the gap between it and the 787 is just too small to really have a huge number of sales for a new plane. I like the idea of a spruced up 767, but that would just be a less efficient 787. I don't know

The problem with the 787 is that on routes a 767 can do it isn't any more efficient than a current 767, so a more efficient 767 would probably be more efficient than a 787. Boeing just wants airlines to order the 787 for all those routes too.

TallFlyer 01-24-2020 06:04 PM

Whatever happened to the 787-3?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Redbird611 01-24-2020 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by TallFlyer (Post 2963748)
Whatever happened to the 787-3?

787-3 was initially targeted for Japan. It was supposed to be a 787-8 with clipped wings to fit in a 767 gate. Inefficiency would be compensated for by cramming in 300-ish people, but when the 787 program ran 3+ years behind schedule ANA & JAL switched orders to the 787-8. That left zero 787-3 orders so Boeing didn't develop it.

symbian simian 01-24-2020 09:38 PM


Originally Posted by TimetoClimb (Post 2962528)
The 321XLR is the same tech as the neo but with added tanks, deceased payload iirc. It's obvious that airlines want an airframe they can deploy on a wide vsriety (up to 4700NM) of routes with reasonable load factors and to be able to redeploy if a particular route isn't profitable. Long and thin. I think there is definitely a case for a 5000NM plane with 210-240 pax and 25 percent lower burn but who knows.

757MAX

Sounds more like the MAX than the NEO.....

CaptDave 01-25-2020 08:39 AM

They’ll probably make a single pilot jet to reduce pilot retirement “shortage” and effectively double the amount of pilots they have.

maybe they’ll even start and 8 series.

838
848
858
and so on....

snackysmores 01-25-2020 08:53 AM

They need to design a new modern airplane, with it's own type rating. If their new revolutionary and innovative design still requires a rubber band to talk to the guy next to me it's going to fail.

Name User 01-25-2020 01:09 PM


Originally Posted by snackysmores (Post 2964035)
They need to design a new modern airplane, with it's own type rating. If their new revolutionary and innovative design still requires a fking rubber band to talk to the guy next to me it's going to fail.

Just hope there IS a guy next to you...

(and by what Airbus has been saying just hope there is even a pilot up front to begin with)

badflaps 01-26-2020 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by Name User (Post 2964191)
Just hope there IS a guy next to you...

(and by what Airbus has been saying just hope there is even a pilot up front to begin with)

One pilot operations would would give people caution. One engineer trains are bad enough.

Qotsaautopilot 01-27-2020 02:47 PM


Originally Posted by Name User (Post 2964191)
Just hope there IS a guy next to you...

(and by what Airbus has been saying just hope there is even a pilot up front to begin with)

decades of CRM data. Decades. One pilot is not the answer.

We obviously have no idea what happened with Kobe but I’d bet that having a second pilot (if there wasn’t one) probably would have done wonders for CRM in the challenging conditions if it wasn’t a mechanical issue.

One pilot aircraft operating as an airliner would throw out all we know about CRM. And quite frankly many of us and many more passengers would probably be dead today if it weren’t for operating in a crew environment and treating it as a crew mission.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands