Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Well now, THERE’S a surprise… >

Well now, THERE?S a surprise?


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Well now, THERE’S a surprise…

Old 10-06-2022 | 12:21 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 423
Default

Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
You are insane. Literally

Even if your fantasy of nazis fighting for a Jewish president were true. If you actually had the United States best interests at heart, you would know that a weakened Russia only helps us in the long run. You are so childishly focused on “owning” the other party, you are literally advocating for a direct enemy of the untied states to win a contest that was of their own doing. The level of crazy here is insurmountable, and you have lost track of reality. Good luck



Hubcapped , 09-30-2022 11:16
No “chief” I haven’t asked them but since you said “it’s a pretty big deal for them” I figured you might, you know, ….have some insight. Or you could have just been spinning words, like you do.

By the way, how does our MEC lack initiative or strength of character or is irresponsible? How exactly would you get delta to come to the table? You never answered , and I can’t imagine someone with your integrity and knowledge would purposely evade a question that merely asked them to elaborate on their own stated viewpoints. Or you could just, you know, be full of words

Lol first one is because the dude said Ukraine is run by nazis and Russia has a right to invade them, the other 2 don’t call james names….questions? All of which would be warranted face to face. Way to take things out of context and leave my myriad of respectful RFIs to suit your narrative though

Calling someone stupid over thoughts on capitalism at THE VERY FIRST comment on a subject is ridiculous. But you know that don’t you

Your thoughts on this are duly noted and disregarded.

I stand by my statement

Last edited by Hubcapped; 10-06-2022 at 12:55 PM.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 01:40 PM
  #22  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,237
Likes: 254
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
It was considered fraud by executives, due to manipulation of prices in advance of exercising options at a lower price. Excess capital should be distributed to shareholders via the dividend.
So fraud IF they exercised options or otherwise used insider information for personal gain? I can see that. Trading on inside information, particularly when you are able to manipulate decisions that will affect stock price is illegal, well, except for members of Congress…
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 02:54 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
I call bull****. You’d only say it if you had a physical advantage, and there is no way to discern that online tough guy

Usually people with the loudest mouth online are weak in the flesh
I am happy you have an opinion.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 03:24 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
I call bull****. You’d only say it if you had a physical advantage, and there is no way to discern that online tough guy

Usually people with the loudest mouth online are weak in the flesh
chill out. I’m 100% sure red foreman would call me stupid to my face and also beat me and my dad up.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 03:36 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Stock buybacks were once illegal, because they are fraud, however the Reagan administration made them legal in 1982 so here we are.
Correct. There is also the matter of the accounting treatment of stock based compensation that encourages management to choose buybacks.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 04:22 PM
  #26  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 213
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Stock buybacks were considered illegal in the US for most of the 20th century due to stock price manipulation concerns.

Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.

Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).

Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.

The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 05:10 PM
  #27  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
So fraud IF they exercised options or otherwise used insider information for personal gain? I can see that. Trading on inside information, particularly when you are able to manipulate decisions that will affect stock price is illegal, well, except for members of Congress…
Executive compensation is, a lot of times, based on stock performance, so if you can manipulate the price, you don't have to actually perform for a company. I can't think of any situation where buy backs help investors in contrast to the dividend.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 05:39 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Executive compensation is, a lot of times, based on stock performance, so if you can manipulate the price, you don't have to actually perform for a company. I can't think of any situation where buy backs help investors in contrast to the dividend.

There’s really only two ways to reward investors. Dividends or buybacks. I believe Congress just passed legislation for a 1% tax on buybacks so hopefully that sways it towards dividends a bit. Personally I’ve been moving $ in retirement accounts to higher paying dividend companies and away from companies that do buybacks.
Reply
Old 10-06-2022 | 06:01 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Stock buybacks were considered illegal in the US for most of the 20th century due to stock price manipulation concerns.

Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.

Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).

Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.

The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.

Thanks for the insight. I wasn’t aware of the background on buybacks. I kind of always saw it as stock price manipulation for management compensation and for that reason preferred higher paying dividend companies.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flying4rent
Trans States Airlines
1
02-25-2020 12:07 PM
MTOG
United
57
07-01-2019 06:55 PM
mojo6911
Regional
35
02-14-2014 05:34 PM
lakehouse
American
3
09-08-2012 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices