Well now, THERE’S a surprise…
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 423
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
You are insane. Literally
Even if your fantasy of nazis fighting for a Jewish president were true. If you actually had the United States best interests at heart, you would know that a weakened Russia only helps us in the long run. You are so childishly focused on “owning” the other party, you are literally advocating for a direct enemy of the untied states to win a contest that was of their own doing. The level of crazy here is insurmountable, and you have lost track of reality. Good luck
Hubcapped , 09-30-2022 11:16
No “chief” I haven’t asked them but since you said “it’s a pretty big deal for them” I figured you might, you know, ….have some insight. Or you could have just been spinning words, like you do.
By the way, how does our MEC lack initiative or strength of character or is irresponsible? How exactly would you get delta to come to the table? You never answered , and I can’t imagine someone with your integrity and knowledge would purposely evade a question that merely asked them to elaborate on their own stated viewpoints. Or you could just, you know, be full of words
You are insane. Literally
Even if your fantasy of nazis fighting for a Jewish president were true. If you actually had the United States best interests at heart, you would know that a weakened Russia only helps us in the long run. You are so childishly focused on “owning” the other party, you are literally advocating for a direct enemy of the untied states to win a contest that was of their own doing. The level of crazy here is insurmountable, and you have lost track of reality. Good luck
Hubcapped , 09-30-2022 11:16
No “chief” I haven’t asked them but since you said “it’s a pretty big deal for them” I figured you might, you know, ….have some insight. Or you could have just been spinning words, like you do.
By the way, how does our MEC lack initiative or strength of character or is irresponsible? How exactly would you get delta to come to the table? You never answered , and I can’t imagine someone with your integrity and knowledge would purposely evade a question that merely asked them to elaborate on their own stated viewpoints. Or you could just, you know, be full of words
Lol first one is because the dude said Ukraine is run by nazis and Russia has a right to invade them, the other 2 don’t call james names….questions? All of which would be warranted face to face. Way to take things out of context and leave my myriad of respectful RFIs to suit your narrative though
Calling someone stupid over thoughts on capitalism at THE VERY FIRST comment on a subject is ridiculous. But you know that don’t you
Your thoughts on this are duly noted and disregarded.
I stand by my statement
Last edited by Hubcapped; 10-06-2022 at 12:55 PM.
#22
So fraud IF they exercised options or otherwise used insider information for personal gain? I can see that. Trading on inside information, particularly when you are able to manipulate decisions that will affect stock price is illegal, well, except for members of Congress…
#23
Banned
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
#24
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
chill out. I’m 100% sure red foreman would call me stupid to my face and also beat me and my dad up.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
#26
Stock buybacks were considered illegal in the US for most of the 20th century due to stock price manipulation concerns.
Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.
Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).
Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.
The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.
Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.
Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).
Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.
The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.
#27
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
So fraud IF they exercised options or otherwise used insider information for personal gain? I can see that. Trading on inside information, particularly when you are able to manipulate decisions that will affect stock price is illegal, well, except for members of Congress…
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 59
There’s really only two ways to reward investors. Dividends or buybacks. I believe Congress just passed legislation for a 1% tax on buybacks so hopefully that sways it towards dividends a bit. Personally I’ve been moving $ in retirement accounts to higher paying dividend companies and away from companies that do buybacks.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 59
Stock buybacks were considered illegal in the US for most of the 20th century due to stock price manipulation concerns.
Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.
Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).
Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.
The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.
Time to go back to the days before Rule 10b-18.
Pay the executives millions (if they deserve it or can negotiate it).
Use the profits generated by the company to either reward stockholders with dividends, employees for their efforts, or reinvest in the business.
The experiment has been tried; stock buybacks by CEO's to enhance the value of their stock options at the expense of everything else has been a colossal failure.
Thanks for the insight. I wasn’t aware of the background on buybacks. I kind of always saw it as stock price manipulation for management compensation and for that reason preferred higher paying dividend companies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



