Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Outlook

Old 04-17-2023 | 07:30 AM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: HC-130J
Default

Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
Welcome to Discussion Questions! Your questions are worthy of discussing!

1) have you considered the fruit company of which forrest gump was invested in could have very well been an advertising scheme by SJ during the atrocious year of the colored iMac?

2) do you suppose it could have just as easily been a window company referenced in the movie?

Thank you for choosing Discussion Questions!

Kidding

lost but not forgotten
DiscussionQs was funnier. Why were they moderated away?
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 08:14 AM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee
Default

Originally Posted by TriggeredNOTAM
DiscussionQs was funnier. Why were they moderated away?
I know, true. Because, apc.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 08:20 AM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 701
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
Welcome to Discussion Questions! Your questions are worthy of discussing!

1) have you considered the fruit company of which forrest gump was invested in could have very well been an advertising scheme by SJ during the atrocious year of the colored iMac?

2) do you suppose it could have just as easily been a window company referenced in the movie?

Thank you for choosing Discussion Questions!

Kidding

lost but not forgotten
I almost banned you.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 08:21 AM
  #14  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 701
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
I know, true. Because, apc.
People complained. We might actually tolerate a troll account if they're consistently funny enough though.
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 07:03 PM
  #15  
av8or's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 2
From: This side of the dirt.
Default

Originally Posted by FAAFlyer
We could pay off our national "debt" tomorrow if we decided to. However, that would be catastrophic for the dollar. Also, we do not depend on foreign nations to purchase debt. The Fed is the largest holder of treasuries, and it also creates the currency. I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
Genuine question: With what?
Reply
Old 04-17-2023 | 08:20 PM
  #16  
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I almost banned you.

Hahaha that would been an epic way to go 😅
Reply
Old 04-18-2023 | 02:53 AM
  #17  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 283
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
I thought this thread was going to be about Microsoft products.
I thought it was going to be about Miatas. Boy was I disappointed.
Reply
Old 04-18-2023 | 06:13 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 155
Default

Originally Posted by av8or
Genuine question: With what?
FAAFlyer is right.
Any nation that controls it's own currency can create enough of it to pay any bill it needs to.
It is one of the bases of sovereignty, and why any national debt should be only assumed if it can be paid in the debtor's nation 'coin of the realm'. (a foreign lender may balk at issuing the loan with that stipulation)

AS FAAFlyer pointed out, there would probably be negative consequences if the debt was paid in this manner, but there is nothing to prevent it. Most money (US Dollars anyway) is just entries in a computer. Almost 90% of it doesn't physically exist.
Reply
Old 04-19-2023 | 08:04 PM
  #19  
av8or's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 2
From: This side of the dirt.
Default

Originally Posted by MaxQ
FAAFlyer is right.
Any nation that controls it's own currency can create enough of it to pay any bill it needs to.
It is one of the bases of sovereignty, and why any national debt should be only assumed if it can be paid in the debtor's nation 'coin of the realm'. (a foreign lender may balk at issuing the loan with that stipulation)

AS FAAFlyer pointed out, there would probably be negative consequences if the debt was paid in this manner, but there is nothing to prevent it. Most money (US Dollars anyway) is just entries in a computer. Almost 90% of it doesn't physically exist.
Yeah…. That works as long as the debtors are willing to accept your fiat currency for the debt repayment. The backing of “full faith and credit” is beginning to to wear thin around the world as witnessed by the countries joining BRIX. The other major players in the world economy back their currency with ACTUAL things like commodities. There’s a REASON that the Ruble was able to survive and INCREASE in value after we got them kicked off the SWIFT exchange…. Cause they have gas and oil to sell (which now we know, even Ukraine was still buying from them). If/when the petro dollar gets replaced as world currency, then what? We just gonna print more paper? Write more checks?

I bet Lee and Jackson had the ability to pay off all their debts with Confederate currency…. Right up till about April of 1865.

The fact that we back our currency with “our good name and standing” is laughable at this point.
Reply
Old 04-20-2023 | 08:52 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 155
Default

Originally Posted by av8or
Yeah…. That works as long as the debtors are willing to accept your fiat currency for the debt repayment. The backing of “full faith and credit” is beginning to to wear thin around the world as witnessed by the countries joining BRIX. The other major players in the world economy back their currency with ACTUAL things like commodities. There’s a REASON that the Ruble was able to survive and INCREASE in value after we got them kicked off the SWIFT exchange…. Cause they have gas and oil to sell (which now we know, even Ukraine was still buying from them). If/when the petro dollar gets replaced as world currency, then what? We just gonna print more paper? Write more checks?

I bet Lee and Jackson had the ability to pay off all their debts with Confederate currency…. Right up till about April of 1865.

The fact that we back our currency with “our good name and standing” is laughable at this point.
To refresh, my response was to your question (regarding paying off sovereign debt) "with what?" There is nothing preventing a past debt being paid with newly created money. Whether that is the best way to do so is another question.
There are some things to remember when we get into the doom scenario regarding USA debt and dollars.

A. Most of the USA debt is owed to itself, in one way or another. Foreign debt is in the minority. Example: Treasury owes a vast amount to Soc. Security.

B. Country to country world trade still requires US dollars for the transactions. A 3 step process requiring a constant supply of US dollars, which have a high velocity. (I accept the judgement of people with a better understanding of this process who assert that this very rapid turnover of dollars lessens the inflationary cost of short term dollar gluts. I readily admit I don't follow all the nuance of this process)

C. The USA (and possibly Argentina) is the only country in the world that has all necessary inputs for modern agriculture in its own territory. Every other country has to have some sort of global trade to either feed itself with imported calories, or have imports of one or more of the inputs required for their agricultural yield. Which brings us around to the above B, regarding the need for US dollars worldwide.

D. It is possible that a foreign lender may, in the future, demand payment in a different currency than the dollar.
Personal opinion, based on correlation from reading more knowledgeable people than I, but I have not read anyone with the same conclusion. That is, the most important factor in the value of a currency is the perceived stability of the Govt behind it. This includes risk of war as well as internal stability. Unlike many other countries, the risk to the USA is of a devastating war is nuclear. A nuclear war probably would mean there is no longer any semblance of an economy, making this discussion irrelevant.
As to internal stability, until 2016/2017 there was no other country that would have even remotely been an alternative. Is there now another country who could be considered having both a large enough economy and more stable? Until that question can be answered in the affirmative, whether the rest of the world likes it or not, they are stuck with the dollar.

More later if I get ambitious.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DC8DRIVER
Cargo
6
03-24-2014 06:37 AM
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
9
07-26-2010 05:13 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-13-2006 02:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices