Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Will there be a rebound due to 1500 hr rule? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/145780-will-there-rebound-due-1500-hr-rule.html)

SonicFlyer 01-03-2024 01:52 PM

Will there be a rebound due to 1500 hr rule?
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianfo...h=7e50d53d2c60

Jdub2 01-03-2024 01:57 PM

I see we’ve resurrected the tool of the day thread, and the first honoree has set the bar quite high!

Vsop 01-03-2024 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdub2 (Post 3745410)
I see we’ve resurrected the tool of the day thread, and the first honoree has set the bar quite high!

Agreed. This is a very high bar for the next tool of the day to surpass.

Margaritaville 01-03-2024 04:34 PM

Union hating SonicFlyer posting an article from union hating Forbes magazine in a pilot site? Here's my shocked face.

He's always been one of the biggest trolls on this site but for some reason they keep letting him do it.

TOTD

glassnpowder98 01-03-2024 05:20 PM

It’s funny the author fails to mention the decades of furloughs, bankruptcy contracts, and career stagnation. Managements and macro economics created the shortage. The government exacerbated it by making more barriers to entry. Pilots get to capitalize until the next downturn.

rickair7777 01-03-2024 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaritaville (Post 3745462)
Union hating SonicFlyer posting an article from union hating Forbes magazine in a pilot site? Here's my shocked face.

He's always been one of the biggest trolls on this site but for some reason they keep letting him do it.

TOTD

Unpopular opinion isn't necessarily trolling.

Puddytatt 01-03-2024 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3745498)
Unpopular opinion isn't necessarily trolling.

What about when said poster is admittedly on an industry forum and isn't part of said industry? And only ever posts anti-industry standard (aka anti-union) posts? Maybe they do post more than that, but honestly I never see them post anything but anti-labor garbage. Must be some sort of mental tick or something to so closely follow, and so vehemently oppose airline labor, when you aren't airline labor yourself. I truly don't get it, but maybe I'm in the wrong.

rickair7777 01-03-2024 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddytatt (Post 3745504)
What about when said poster is admittedly on an industry forum and isn't part of said industry? And only ever posts anti-industry standard (aka anti-union) posts? Maybe they do post more than that, but honestly I never see them post anything but anti-labor garbage. Must be some sort of mental tick or something to so closely follow, and so vehemently oppose airline labor, when you aren't airline labor yourself. I truly don't get it, but maybe I'm in the wrong.

He was a regional pilot years ago.

It doesn't hurt us to understand the sentiment that's out there.

madmax757 01-03-2024 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3745511)
He was a regional pilot years ago.

It doesn't hurt us to understand the sentiment that's out there.

Are you saying the author of that article in WAPO was a regional pilot or sonic flyer ?

SonicFlyer 01-03-2024 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3745511)
He was a regional pilot years ago.

If you're referring to me, that is not accurate. I do fly for a 135 though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddytatt (Post 3745504)
And only ever posts anti-industry standard (aka anti-union) posts?

LOL... opinions that might be different are "anti-union?" ha ha ha.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddytatt (Post 3745504)
Maybe they do post more than that, but honestly I never see them post anything but anti-labor garbage.

Well then you haven't been looking very closely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddytatt (Post 3745504)
Must be some sort of mental tick or something to so closely follow, and so vehemently oppose airline labor, when you aren't airline labor yourself. I truly don't get it, but maybe I'm in the wrong.

People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job. It should be a choice. That being said, unions do a lot of good things. They also do a lot of bad things. It's a mixed bag / double edge sword.

Rhdicjkwso 01-03-2024 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745547)
If you're referring to me, that is not accurate. I do fly for a 135 though.

LOL... opinions that might be different are "anti-union?" ha ha ha.



Well then you haven't been looking very closely.

People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job. It should be a choice. That being said, unions do a lot of good things. They also do a lot of bad things. It's a mixed bag / double edge sword.


Are you speaking from experience or are these just your thoughts? Have you been a part of a union?

WHACKMASTER 01-03-2024 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhdicjkwso (Post 3745566)
Are you speaking from experience or are these just your thoughts? Have you been a part of a union?

What do you guys say we all make it a habit to spend time on the Part 135 forums and post pro-union propaganda? That’d be so weird, wouldn’t it?

Name User 01-04-2024 05:19 AM

The major thing missed in all these "union pushed pilot shortage" articles is three or four of the five crashes post 2000 had guys who had attended the pay-to-play company named Gulfstream Airlines down in FL. They bought their right seat B1900 job for $25k and got their time then moved into other carriers.

Since it's inception (1500 hrs) the pay to play went away and with it the type of people who were essentially unemployable by normal means.

GogglesPisano 01-04-2024 05:25 AM

Since medieval times guilds have restricted access to professions. The AMA does it, the ABA does it (to a lesser degree.) I would hope ALPA would also do it. I always questioned why they spent a dime on booths at events encouraging people to become pilots.

jerryleber 01-04-2024 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745547)
People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job.

Pilots don't have to join the union, but you have to pay the contract maintenance fee. Plenty of non-union operators to fly for also.

GogglesPisano 01-04-2024 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745547)

People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job. .

There are plenty of non-union jobs out there. They tend to be at the lower levels of compensation/desirability.

Any guesses why that is, Sonic?

CBreezy 01-04-2024 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 3745652)
There are plenty of non-union jobs out there. They tend to be at the lower levels of compensation/desirability.

Any guesses why that is, Sonic?

He wants the money but thinks he deserves it. He shouldn't have to pay the union for the good paying job even though the job is good paying and desirable because of the union. It's the peak of entitlement.

Margaritaville 01-04-2024 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3745498)
Unpopular opinion isn't necessarily trolling.

Sure it is. He's posting it just to get a rise out of people. I think they call it flame bait? You've gone after people for less. But hey, it's your show.

SonicFlyer 01-04-2024 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaritaville (Post 3745732)
Sure it is. He's posting it just to get a rise out of people. I think they call it flame bait? You've gone after people for less. But hey, it's your show.

You want to silence and censor people who may have or at least offer different or alternate opinions than your own?

at6d 01-04-2024 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745767)
You want to silence and censor people who may have or at least offer different or alternate opinions than your own?

(insert Star Wars “It’s a trap!” Meme)

Margaritaville 01-04-2024 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745767)
You want to silence and censor people who may have or at least offer different or alternate opinions than your own?

Dont pull your victim nonsense on me. You have all the freedom in the world to start and pay for your own website and post all the anti Pilot nonsense you want.

m3113n1a1 01-04-2024 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745547)
People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job. It should be a choice. That being said, unions do a lot of good things. They also do a lot of bad things. It's a mixed bag / double edge sword.

No one is forced to work for a unionized airline. We do so by choice. If someone is extremely anti-union they can work at any non-union company that their heart desires.

Rama 01-05-2024 07:31 AM

Even if you work for a unionized airline, you don't have to join the union-just pay some fee regarding the value of the union contract.
That may vary by state, but I do know a now retired crewmwmber who quit the union and kept flying.

SonicFlyer 01-05-2024 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaritaville (Post 3745982)
Dont pull your victim nonsense on me. You have all the freedom in the world to start and pay for your own website and post all the anti Pilot nonsense you want.

I haven't posted any "anti-pilot" posts on here at all

OOfff 01-05-2024 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3746266)
I haven't posted any "anti-pilot" posts on here at all

being anti-union is being anti-pilot.

SonicFlyer 01-05-2024 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3746299)
being anti-union is being anti-pilot.

Only for the small-minded groupthink crowd that lacks critical thinking and independent thought skills.

Besides, I'm not anti-union, they do some good things. I'm anti-forced union, because it should be a choice.

OOfff 01-05-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3746318)
Only for the small-minded groupthink crowd that lacks critical thinking and independent thought skills.

Besides, I'm not anti-union, they do some good things. I'm anti-forced union, because it should be a choice.

it is a choice. You can get hired at my shop and choose not to join the Union.


however, you rightfully will pay a fee for contract maintenance because you benefit from the Union contract.

Vsop 01-05-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3746318)
Only for the small-minded groupthink crowd that lacks critical thinking and independent thought skills.

Besides, I'm not anti-union, they do some good things. I'm anti-forced union, because it should be a choice.

You admit the union offers good things but you don't want to be forced to join. Does that mean not forced to pay dues? The idea behind unions only works when all are united. If every worker gets the benefits of the union, then they should pay to have those benefits. I’ve been or are a part of multiple unions ALPA, Minnesota Nurses Association, and the Bloomington Federation of Teachers. All had the exact same requirements for employees to join and pay dues.

rickair7777 01-05-2024 10:32 AM

The right to not join the union while paying a reduced fee for contract services from which you obviously benefit from seems like a fair compromise.

at6d 01-05-2024 10:49 AM

I find it odd that a pilot would want to be employed in a 121 environment and would prefer not to subscribe to legal representation. If anything other than contract dues, legal and medical representation/benefits could save your career. It’s not like the employers actually “care.”

hoover 01-05-2024 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3746333)
it is a choice. You can get hired at my shop and choose not to join the Union.


however, you rightfully will pay a fee for contract maintenance because you benefit from the Union contract.

is the fee essentially the same as if one was paying dues?
Would that person still benefit from the new work rules pay etc?

Rama 01-05-2024 01:13 PM

The excess amount was refunded to the retired guy I know every year.
Not sure how it was determined, but it was a fair amount back if I remember correctly. He was happy to not have to pay for "the world's most expensive magazine."

OOfff 01-05-2024 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoover (Post 3746404)
is the fee essentially the same as if one was paying dues?
Would that person still benefit from the new work rules pay etc?

yes. You work under the same contract, so all rules are identical. The amount is slightly less.

you’d lose the Union protections in disciplinary actions, medical issues, and some other things.

OOfff 01-05-2024 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rama (Post 3746437)
The excess amount was refunded to the retired guy I know every year.
Not sure how it was determined, but it was a fair amount back if I remember correctly. He was happy to not have to pay for "the world's most expensive magazine."

anyone making that joke about the “magazine” and not seeing the IMMENSE value of unionization in 121 airlines is dangerously stupid.

sailingfun 01-06-2024 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by at6d (Post 3746354)
I find it odd that a pilot would want to be employed in a 121 environment and would prefer not to subscribe to legal representation. If anything other than contract dues, legal and medical representation/benefits could save your career. It’s not like the employers actually “care.”

There was a pilot at Delta who was involved in a quite serious incident when Delta was a open shop. He was a non union member paying no dues. He promptly paid up all his back dues in order to obtain union representation. That was a bit controversial and some said the union should have just let him hire his own representation as it was going to be and was a expensive battle.

Extenda 01-06-2024 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3746672)
There was a pilot at Delta who was involved in a quite serious incident when Delta was a open shop. He was a non union member paying no dues. He promptly paid up all his back dues in order to obtain union representation. That was a bit controversial and some said the union should have just let him hire his own representation as it was going to be and was a expensive battle.

that seems wrong. It’s like getting in a crash after having a car for a year without insurance then calling the insurance company and they let you pay a years worth of retro dues to cover the cost of your crashed car.

Grumpyaviator 01-07-2024 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3745547)
If you're referring to me, that is not accurate. I do fly for a 135 though.

LOL... opinions that might be different are "anti-union?" ha ha ha.



Well then you haven't been looking very closely.

People shouldn't be forced to join a union and pay dues to get a job. It should be a choice. That being said, unions do a lot of good things. They also do a lot of bad things. It's a mixed bag / double edge sword.

what are the bad things?

sailingfun 01-07-2024 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extenda (Post 3747105)
that seems wrong. It’s like getting in a crash after having a car for a year without insurance then calling the insurance company and they let you pay a years worth of retro dues to cover the cost of your crashed car.

Many agreed with you. The pilot in question was a crew member on Delta 1141. I think the union felt there were so many issues that could help pilots down the road they felt the investment was worth it.

rickair7777 01-07-2024 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3747315)
Many agreed with you. The pilot in question was a crew member on Delta 1141. I think the union felt there were so many issues that could help pilots down the road they felt the investment was worth it.

If the union felt it was a good strategic move in a particular case, OK that's what we pay them for.

I don't think any and every non-member should be able to retro-actively buy in anytime they screw up and need help though.

2StgTurbine 01-07-2024 07:15 AM

I love it when these anti-union part 91 and 135 pilots want all the financial benefits of working for a major airline, but don't want to join a union. They act like the union dues are an unbearable burden. They also seem to be uneducated on what those dues actually do. They think that money goes to a few cronies who use their union position to get out of work. While there are cases of that happening, it's not different than any other form of low-level corruption that takes place at all levels of society. I bet it's even lower since so much of their work is on record. Dropping trips with pay seems awesome until you realize it's so they can fly halfway across the country to attend a boring meeting about contract violations or watch a PowerPoint about new healthcare options.

And if money is all you care about, here are my numbers for 2023. Gross pay: $404,000. Union dues: $7,080. That's 1.75%. But it gets even better. Those dues paid for the negations for our new contract that got me $47,000 in retro pay alone. Then there was a union volunteer who audited one of my trips and discovered I was owed over $2,000. I will gladly pay a small fee for a group of union members to monitor my pay and deal with all the corporate bureaucracy to chase down the money the company owes me.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 AM.
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands