Major Airline Retirements
I thought I would post this before it becomes obsolete. These are numbers I have dug up and collected from multiple threads. These numbers are between 3-6 months old, so they are not 100% accurate, but they should give a good glimpse into retirement numbers at major airlines.
Code:
Year AA UAL DAL CAL |
[QUOTE=aerospacepilot;206814]I thought I would post this before it becomes obsolete. These are numbers I have dug up and collected from multiple threads. These numbers are between 3-6 months old, so they are not 100% accurate, but they should give a good glimpse into retirement numbers at major airlines.
NWA...what are our numbers? |
[quote=reddog25;206945]
Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
(Post 206814)
I thought I would post this before it becomes obsolete. These are numbers I have dug up and collected from multiple threads. These numbers are between 3-6 months old, so they are not 100% accurate, but they should give a good glimpse into retirement numbers at major airlines.
NWA...what are our numbers? 2008................... 239 2009................... 166 2010................... 188 2011................... 187 2012................... 207 2013................... 207 2014................... 239 2015................... 278 2016................... 260 2017................... 295 I think there are still 100 or so to go thru the end of this year, also. Not exact numbers, but in the ballpark. :rolleyes: New K Now |
FedEx Retirement Chart
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a FedEx retirement chart. It DOES NOT take into account any age 65 legislation.
|
Speaking of that.....what is the current situation on the age 65 add on to the FAA reauth bill? Will it pass as is? or will someone strip it out? For another year or two?
|
Retirements
Industry wide there are perhaps between 1000 to 1500 annual retirements over the next ten years or so at the majors. Unless they expand rapidly there will be slim pickings for those hoping to jump to the majors.
SkyHigh |
Originally Posted by SkyHigh
(Post 207231)
Industry wide there are perhaps between 1000 to 1500 annual retirements over the next ten years or so at the majors. Unless they expand rapidly there will be slim pickings for those hoping to jump to the majors.
SkyHigh 'Slim pickings' are a hell of an improvement from 'no one is hiring.' Not that forecasts beyond maybe 12 months are worth anything anyway. Go ahead and tell me I'm wrong. |
Forecast
Originally Posted by Sputnik
(Post 207240)
Ah it doesn't matter what the thread, you're always handy with a wet blanket. I guess slim pickings are good as everyone I know who went looking in past two years has been picked up.
'Slim pickings' are a hell of an improvement from 'no one is hiring.' Not that forecasts beyond maybe 12 months are worth anything anyway. Go ahead and tell me I'm wrong. You might call my views as a wet blanket however I would refer to them as an honest evaluation. I am sure that you will reach your career goals. The next question will be it you will be able to hang on to them. SkyHigh |
Originally Posted by bustinmins
(Post 207176)
Here is a FedEx retirement chart. It DOES NOT take into account any age 65 legislation.
Yeah, so just shift everything to the right 5 years :D. |
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 207331)
Yeah, so just shift everything to the right 5 years :D.
I would think the age 65 rule will slow seniority somewhat, but not as much as folks would think. |
Originally Posted by SamFoxpilot
(Post 207387)
I gotta ask since this is been discussed so much. Who's to say everyone would retire 5 years later w/the age 65 limit? Don't most companies allow for some form of early retirement? I'm new to the industry, so I honestly don't know.
I would think the age 65 rule will slow seniority somewhat, but not as much as folks would think. Others, for whatever reason, may need the additional 5 years to make up for whatever they did, or however their career panned out. Maybe the guy was furloughed/displaced multiple times or had something else happen (illness, family issues) to where he was never really able to get a sizable retirement nest egg going. My comment was meant as common joke that is starting to take place with age 65 becoming a reality. |
I agree because Sick Leave and LTD for those above 60 will be very high maybe as high as 30 to 40 percent. Those actually flying will have a very high sick call rate so that could effectively make it 50% less then if age 60 stayed the same.
|
Lets not stray into one of those age 65 things. Almost every thread about retirements gets hijacked into age 65 :rolleyes:. Does anyone have any numbers on other major carriers such as Alaska, Spirit, Jet Blue, and of course the larger regionals Skywest, RAH and such?
|
Originally Posted by CAL EWR
(Post 207431)
I agree because Sick Leave and LTD for those above 60 will be very high maybe as high as 30 to 40 percent. Those actually flying will have a very high sick call rate so that could effectively make it 50% less then if age 60 stayed the same.
The other thing, airlines will think it's great that guys over 60 can fly. Except for when they start calling sick at their high pay rates and realize they are going to need to staff better. To top it off, the amount of vacation time accrued, as well as the hourly cost of that vacation is going to be big. |
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 207437)
Can you imagine the headache this is going to cause for airline management? If it passes that an over 60 guy can only fly with an under 60 guy, what a scam for FO's at airlines that still have line bidding. The under 60 guy can buddy bid with the over 60 guy and get displaced off his trip and sit at home. Of course with a PBS type system it will just withhold the trip and the senior/old FO won't be able to take advantage.
The other thing, airlines will think it's great that guys over 60 can fly. Except for when they start calling sick at their high pay rates and realize they are going to need to staff better. To top it off, the amount of vacation time accrued, as well as the hourly cost of that vacation is going to be big. |
Originally Posted by XtremeF150
(Post 207435)
Lets not stray into one of those age 65 things. Almost every thread about retirements gets hijacked into age 65 :rolleyes:. Does anyone have any numbers on other major carriers such as Alaska, Spirit, Jet Blue, and of course the larger regionals Skywest, RAH and such?
2007 76 2008 48 2009 43 2010 48 2011 52 2012 49 2013 47 2014 50 2015 55 2016 58 2017 59 2018 51 2019 58 2020 58 2021 52 2022 79 2023 56 2024 74 2025 51 2026 54 2027 67 2028 53 2029 64 2030 56 2031 50 These numbers may not seem large, but in comparison we only have 1500 pilots - so these numbers ARE large. |
Also, it takes number 1100ish to make captain here. That means 7 years for someone hired right now assuming zero growth.
FYI |
Originally Posted by aerospacepilot
(Post 206814)
I thought I would post this before it becomes obsolete. These are numbers I have dug up and collected from multiple threads.
Thanks for the effort. Do you have anything past 2017? Thanks |
Originally Posted by XtremeF150
(Post 207435)
Lets not stray into one of those age 65 things. Almost every thread about retirements gets hijacked into age 65 :rolleyes:. Does anyone have any numbers on other major carriers such as Alaska, Spirit, Jet Blue, and of course the larger regionals Skywest, RAH and such?
Year Ret. 2007 34 2008 31 2009 27 2010 34 2011 31 2012 31 2013 33 2014 50 2015 54 2016 71 2017 74 2018 72 2019 65 2020 94 2021 90 2022 88 2023 117 2024 90 2025 96 2026 87 2027 108 2028 96 2029 100 2030 97 2031 91 2032 103 2033 102 2034 85 2035 97 2036 67 2037 60 2038 68 2039 59 2040 66 2041 53 2042 59 2043 33 2044 13 2045 7 These numbers are from our Feb 07 Seniority list. We have approx 3000 pilots total on our list. These numbers dont include any AA flowbacks who came from AA to AE when they were furloughed. There were about 350 total flowbacks and I think there are about 234 left on the list. Due to AA recalls I expect most of them to be recalled in the next 2-3 years. |
Originally Posted by XtremeF150
(Post 207435)
Lets not stray into one of those age 65 things. Almost every thread about retirements gets hijacked into age 65 :rolleyes:. Does anyone have any numbers on other major carriers such as Alaska, Spirit, Jet Blue, and of course the larger regionals Skywest, RAH and such?
|
Originally Posted by flaps 9
(Post 207502)
I agree 100%. I don't understand why any airline would support changing the age 60 rule.:confused:
|
Age 60 legislation
The bills are titled the "Freedom to Fly Act 2007" and are:
H.R. 1125 w/ 245 sponsors and S.65 w/ 44 sponsors (note-sponsor totals include the individual submitting the bill) Both bills are sitting in committee with no action for the past few months. the FAA's NPRM is still lodged firmly somewhere in the bureaucratic process with no additional info other than Blakely's press release in January. |
Why is sky high still here?
|
Originally Posted by kronan
(Post 209803)
The FAA's NPRM is still lodged firmly somewhere in the bureaucratic process with no additional info other than Blakely's press release in January.
|
Originally Posted by SamFoxpilot
(Post 207387)
I gotta ask since this is been discussed so much. Who's to say everyone would retire 5 years later w/the age 65 limit? Don't most companies allow for some form of early retirement? I'm new to the industry, so I honestly don't know.
I would think the age 65 rule will slow seniority somewhat, but not as much as folks would think. So if this is any indicator, 95% of pilots will go to 65 if able. |
Just consider
Every year there are around 10,000 new commercial pilot licenses issued and at least 5000 military pilots trained for an average of less than 2000 good airline jobs from retirements. In addition we have people from overseas coming to the states to take flying jobs.
Future prospects do not seem very bright either. The better airline jobs are being replaced by RJ's and LCCs and we are still waiting for at least one or two of the legacy carriers to fall. Most likely there will be even fewer opportunities for a good job in the future. If the age 65 rule is passed over night there will be almost 17% more pilots. People blow a small fortune on what really is a slim chance of even being able to earn back the price of entry. And people claim that "I" am the crazy one. SkyHigh Hey man, why is this Sky High guy even here? :mad: There, I saved you the trouble. |
FAA STATS: 2006
Commercial--Total 117,610 Airline Transport --Total 141,935 Commercial Issued in 2006 8,687 TABLE 17 ORIGINAL AIRMEN CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CATEGORY CALENDAR YEARS 1997-2006 Category of Certificates 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 Pilot--Total 99,792 91,446 99,416 98,643 113,583 108,000 106,517 101,386 108,994 100,472 StudentE 61,448 53,576 59,202 58,842 65,421 61,897 58,042 58,278 63,037 60,941 Recreational 41 57 47 48 77 61 93 83 69 60 Sport 784 133 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Airplane Private 20,217 20,889 23,031 23,866 28,659 25,372 27,223 24,630 26,297 21,552 Commercial 8,687 8,834 9,836 9,670 12,299 11,499 11,213 9,737 10,042 8,988 Airline Transport 4,748 4,750 4,255 3,892 4,718 7,070 7,715 6,721 7,547 7,045 Rotorcraft (only) 3,569 2,917 2,736 2,013 2,073 1,698 1,776 1,514 1,530 1,385 Glider (only) 298 290 309 312 336 403 455 423 472 501 Flight Instructor Certificates 1/ 4,506 3,654 5,044 5,012 6,221 5,781 5,386 4,697 4,647 3,958 Instrument Ratings 2/ 9,559 9,482 10,452 10,069 12,626 11,552 11,148 9,538 9,737 8,392 Nonpilot--Total 12,437 13,217 14,656 13,211 16,172 18,102 17,839 19,782 18,701 16,090 Mechanic 5,555 5,651 6,126 6,064 7,733 8,083 8,894 8,197 8,809 7,439 Control Tower Operator 4/ 802 819 893 856 862 790 675 669 N/A N/A Repairmen 3/ 3,307 3,628 4,622 3,415 3,743 3,789 4,210 3,903 3,963 3,255 Parachute Rigger 237 243 238 228 238 214 208 193 286 227 Authorized Aircraft Instr. 6 38 72 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ground Instructor 1,553 1,585 1,919 1,948 2,344 2,087 2,058 1,853 1,972 1,788 Dispatcher 628 657 603 550 722 956 838 964 992 836 Flight Navigator 0 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 Flight Engineer 349 594 182 147 529 2,182 955 4,003 2,679 2,545 Note: In previous releases all instrument ratings had been shown as additional. Total intrument ratings issued can be found in table 21. E Student certificates issued are estimated. 1/ Not included in total. 2/ Special ratings shown on pilot certificates represented above; not included in total. 3/ Prior to 1995, repairmen were included with mechanics. 4/ Prior to 2001 Control Towr Operators were not included. N/A Not Applicable NA Not Available |
TABLE 22
STUDENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED, BY MONTH: CALENDAR YEARS 1997 - 2006 YEAR 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1996 Total 61,448 53,576 58,362 55,446 65,421 61,839 58,042 58,278 63,037 56,653 January 4,489 4,248 4,747 5,346 4,954 4,883 4,234 4,641 4,283 4,067 February 3,951 3,824 4,317 4,114 4,602 4,442 5,846 4,592 4,270 4,057 March 4,605 4,687 4,853 4,306 4,897 5,273 5,063 5,607 4,846 4,301 April 4,375 4,486 4,616 4,294 5,313 4,584 4,001 5,407 4,799 4,758 May 5,217 4,706 4,613 4,982 5,196 5,644 4,697 6,069 4,873 5,065 June 6,050 5,509 5,485 5,531 6,197 6,560 5,182 6,474 5,848 5,031 July 5,684 5,306 6,130 6,046 7,151 6,560 5,037 6,363 6,496 5,807 August 7,203 6,284 6,145 6,216 7,278 7,355 6,401 6,045 6,419 5,564 September 6,064 4,698 5,524 5,592 6,204 4,643 5,216 4,401 6,354 5,192 October 5,437 3,985 4,800 5,201 5,621 5,029 4,958 3,592 5,662 5,310 November 4,468 3,443 4,353 3,818 4,287 4,095 4,130 3,016 4,686 4,240 December 3,905 2,400 2,779 N/A 3,721 2,771 3,277 2,071 4,501 3,261 E Student certificates issued are estimated. The monthly data for most of 1995 contains an estimated component. System reprogramming caused a loss of some data. |
So what? Of course there's a bunch of new pilots learning to fly every year. Doctors don't say," Oh no! I heard that there's a whole bunch of people that want to go to Med school. I better get out of the business because they are probably gonna be better than me and I'll be out of a job". Even sanitation workers have competition(people of similar sanitation backgrounds). Yes, being a Airline Pilot is very competetive, and you're right. There will never be a shortage for real, but so what? There is probably some babies born literally today that may be airline pilots in 25 years. Good for them! Good luck to them. Doesn't mean it's over for everyone else.
|
Originally Posted by tone
(Post 239277)
So what? Of course there's a bunch of new pilots learning to fly every year. Doctors don't say," Oh no! I heard that there's a whole bunch of people that want to go to Med school. I better get out of the business because they are probably gonna be better than me and I'll be out of a job". Even sanitation workers have competition(people of similar sanitation backgrounds). Yes, being a Airline Pilot is very competetive, and you're right. There will never be a shortage for real, but so what? There is probably some babies born literally today that may be airline pilots in 25 years. Good for them! Good luck to them. Doesn't mean it's over for everyone else.
|
What it means
Originally Posted by tone
(Post 239277)
So what? Of course there's a bunch of new pilots learning to fly every year. Doctors don't say," Oh no! I heard that there's a whole bunch of people that want to go to Med school. I better get out of the business because they are probably gonna be better than me and I'll be out of a job". Even sanitation workers have competition(people of similar sanitation backgrounds). Yes, being a Airline Pilot is very competetive, and you're right. There will never be a shortage for real, but so what? There is probably some babies born literally today that may be airline pilots in 25 years. Good for them! Good luck to them. Doesn't mean it's over for everyone else.
Most other professions have some kind of competition however almost no one would pay the price of a house in training and education for a one in ten chance of earning it back. So yes, even sanitation workers have some competition but if it doesnt work out their only loss is the time it took to fill out an application. SkyHigh |
The events of 911 "tweaked" the industry a great deal. Still new pilots in, while a bunch on furlough. Age 65 will do that a little bit too. Forget wages going up in our lifetime with RJ's out there. You are correct-As long as people are willing do "donate" their time, working for just about free, the ones that want to get paid will get paid less. Obviously getting all of your ratings is a risk. The degree is yours forever, however, and those who don't make it to a major need to reevaluate and maybe make a career change, losing out on the money they spent on flight training. Maybe work 9-5 somewhere, and at least instruct on the weekends. (Some peolple are happy working for a regional for life, though)--Maybe live in a trailer park or subsidised housing. I wouldn't as a persional choice, for my son did not chose to live like that. But some will, and ys, that will tweak down the salaries of those who made it to a major. But your ratings are yours to keep, and you never know if you'll use them someday, even if to fly your own set of wings that you may afford working in a "real" (sorry) work environment.
|
Does anyone have retirement numbers beyond 2012 for Southwest?
|
Originally Posted by flaps 9
(Post 207502)
I agree 100%. I don't understand why any airline would support changing the age 60 rule.:confused:
|
Everyone here understands supply and demand and how the over supply reduces pilot career earnings.
Why would XYZ do ABC or say EFG? Airlines support 65; supply ^ Airlines support MPL; supply ^ Airlines put out to the media misleading claims about pilot earnings; supply ^ Airlines put out to the media misleading claims about pilot shortages; supply ^ Even though you understand the concept, you don't have a clue who hit you. http://www.aircon.org/ |
Originally Posted by SamFoxpilot
(Post 207387)
.............
I would think the age 65 rule will slow seniority somewhat, but not as much as folks would think. |
Originally Posted by CALPilotToo
(Post 239842)
Wait a damn minute. SWAPA is one of the biggest flag flyers for age 65. Talk to those you sit next to. Don't worry about management on this one as you guys have pushed for it as much as anyone.
|
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 239436)
Does anyone have retirement numbers beyond 2012 for Southwest?
2013 101 2014 63 2015 64 2016 68 2017 90 2018 82 2019 80 2020 77 |
Originally Posted by tone
(Post 239343)
The degree is yours forever, however, and those who don't make it to a major need to reevaluate and maybe make a career change, losing out on the money they spent on flight training. Maybe work 9-5 somewhere, and at least instruct on the weekends. (Some people are happy working for a regional for life, though)--Maybe live in a trailer park or subsidised housing.
skyhigh i also dont agree with your opinion on "losing out on money." I dont know about you but learning how to fly outside of huge universities is still about 30-40G's which can be viewed as expensive as a masters. Most MBA or equivalents earn about 40 - 70 g's out of school. This is what you could have been making if you got your 4 yr degree, flew for a regional for two years and upgraded somewhere around the 2 yr mark. You would still have made more then that masters degree student. I wish we got paid more too but for young people getting into the industry its comparative to what you could be earning in the outside world. If you want to blame regionals for the major pilots problems then i wonder how they voted on their contract with the scope agreement. |
Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
(Post 240083)
I cannot for the life of me understand why so many pilots want to fly themselves into the grave...... I'm not planning on working my butt off so when I'm gone those who inherit my stuff can live a life of leisure......... There's way to much to do and see in this world other than the cockpit of an airplane.
International flying is considerably more relaxed. While some people have trouble with the body clock thing, for the most part it's like a short vacation. If the tempo of a 3 day trip with a 24 hour layover is too fast, try a 4 day trip with a 48 hour layover, or even a 5 day/ 72 hour layover ( the longer layovers tend to go junior to the shorter ones). We have senior guys who will drop their schedule down to one or two very nice trips (72 hours in Nice is nice!). They are financially able to retire, but don't want to. I don't have a problem with them doing this (even to age 65, when that happens), and I plan to do the same thing when it's my turn. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands