Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Airlines vs. private jets >

Airlines vs. private jets

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Airlines vs. private jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2007, 07:45 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Pooch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 39
Default Airlines vs. private jets

Interesting article called "Duel in the Sky..."
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?id=7257326
Pooch is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 11:51 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

I don't believe that a Gulfstream pays 1/10th of what a 737 pays for a given segment length. It's definently less, but can't be that much. A Gulfstream also uses alot less gas than a 737.

The also failed to mention that this new "funding system" would generate less money than the current system, and that pilots who never even talk to ATC would be paying through the @$$ so that the airline c**kmaster managers can get a tax break. I can't stand the idea of the Pawnee towing my glider lumped in with private jets.
MikeB525 is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 02:13 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Sabre 60
Posts: 203
Default

Originally Posted by MikeB525 View Post
A Gulfstream also uses alot less gas than a 737.
Bingo. That is what our aviation taxes are based on. A Ford F350 pays more in gas taxes than a Toyota Prius, yet they both take up the same amount of "room." Fuel burn is what our taxes are based on. Take a look at the amount of taxes paid per passenger, and it is roughly the same for a G5 and a 737. That is the way it should be!!!


I can't stand the idea of the Pawnee towing my glider lumped in with private jets.
How could a Pawnee be lumped in with private jets?? I thought it was for turbine powered aircraft. Do you know why they want to consider a Pawnee a "corporate jet." I have taken many an aerotow from a Pawnee!!!
aerospacepilot is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 02:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ce650's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: EVIL PRIVATE JET
Posts: 529
Default

The problem is that instead of a 737 going from new york to chicago , it's 3 or 4 RJ's .
ce650 is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 03:05 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiftwork's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: in front of a computer screen
Posts: 712
Default

A319 is roughly burning 5K an hour.... I'm sure a GIII is burning close to that?
shiftwork is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 08:00 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

Found this on AOPA's site. Thought it was amusing:

Airline CEO Labor Delay Excuse Checklist
As airline delays increase, you need to know who you can use as a scapegoat so you can avoid taking responsibility for your own over-scheduling procedures, which even the DOT says are the second-leading cause of delays.

Blame the weather (i.e., too hot, cold, rainy, windy, sunny, etc.).

Blame a computer (after all, one laptop controls all flights at each airport).

Blame airports (be sure to remind everyone that when you over-schedule, they should build more gates).

Blame runways (they should accommodate you when you schedule 58 departures in an hour).

Blame pilots (they should be glad they still have jobs. Everyone else got laid off).

Blame private planes. (Try this game: Have the passengers try to spot one private plane during their five-hour wait on the tarmac. Hint: Because private planes rarely use the crowded hub airports, they will never see one. It's a good way to keep them too busy to realize that you didn't provide them with food.)

Remember: You are trying to get Congress to allot all of us a tax break. You want to make sure that you disregard all responsibility for any of the following:

Our policies of pushing all of our flights into the largest and most congested hubs. Whatever you do, avoid the phrase "hub-and-spoke system."
Poor customer service.
Laying off thousands of employees and cutting pensions while giving upper management millions in bonuses, benefits, and increased pay.
MikeB525 is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 08:07 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

Aerospacepilot,

The original plan called for massive tax increases on AVGAS, not just Jet-A. This means the Pawnee towing my glider, the Cherokee shooting touch and goes, and the Civil Air Patrol 172 doing search and rescue training would have to pay through the @$$ as well.
MikeB525 is offline  
Old 08-28-2007, 11:27 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 193
Default

The true concern for the airlines is not the VFR C-172 paying its fair share. A blip at FL 350 is the concern. The fear is the VLJ has the potential to create as many blips at 350 as current transport aircraft in class A and B airspace. If this will happen remains to be seen. The fact is however, the FAA and ATA believe it will happen and are responding in a predictable way.

Consider the following trends:

-The "air travel" experience is now dreaded by the traveler.

-Not too long ago only the ultra rich could opt out and pay to play in the biz jet world.

-Fractionals have significantly reduced the entry fee. Many of NetJets pax would have been full fare 1st class pax, now lost.

-VLJs have the potential to lower the price to play even further, airlines lose their last high margin pax and end up in flow control waiting to takeoff with only low yield pax on their way from the trailer park to the Jerry Springer show. Jeerrreeey, Jeerrreeey, Jeerrreeey!

-NextGen ATC system required to handle all the blips. Under current funding airlines are stuck with most of the costs while the revenue stream slips away. (This is why the funding structure at first blush makes no sense, ie lower revenue... it's structured on the assumption the sky will be filled with VLJs)

-United saw this way ahead of the other airlines (Avolar) and tried but failed to execute a workable plan. I won't speculate why they failed. It doesn't matter now.

If all this happens against the airlines guess where airline management will look for financial help. Right..... Flight Deck ATMs or FDATMs. That will be you.

Perhaps a few high profile high rollers will create smokin holes and the VLJ predictions will go the way of the Lear Fan, SST, Hypersonic Flight, Unducted Fan, Aero Car, etc. Perhaps not.

NIGHT Freight... looking better every DAY

Last edited by seaav8tor; 08-28-2007 at 11:59 PM.
seaav8tor is offline  
Old 08-29-2007, 02:24 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

The real answer the the air traffic control problem is the number of runways. Plenty of SPACE up there .... but there is only so much ATC can do with the runways avail to get them up and down.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jelloy683
Regional
13
08-14-2007 02:54 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
12-08-2005 06:50 AM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices