Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2006 | 03:31 AM
  #11  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by furloughman
Don't worry, NWA pilots are just buying time so they can coordinate a strike with Delta.

You aren't serious, are you? Because IMHO, it will never happen.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 05:26 AM
  #12  
RandyWaldron's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174

You aren't serious, are you? Because IMHO, it will never happen.
Fireman0714, are you serious? The pilot group at NWA will never approve that TA. Not only are they financially penalized for calling in sick, the company wants to remove the Captain augmentation for long-haul 2-pilot a/c flying (B747-400 TPAC, A330 TPAC/TATL), reduce the blockholder monthly minimum and eliminate all open flying during the regular monthly bid run.

Problems? I see plenty. First of all, the elimination of full pay for sick time is not going to sit well with our most senior pilots. Imagine your 2nd sick call in a year is for a 12-day trans-pacific trip on the -400. It would be your only trip in the month and now if you call in sick you'll be paid 3/4 of what you could actually make? No dice.

The removal of the captain augmentation clause means that all First Officers on the 747-400 and A330 will now have to be type rated on the aircraft means a lot of extra training and expense, that the company cannot afford considering the rest of the cutbacks proposed.

If any open flying is eliminated during the bid run, that will reek havoc with Detroit, considering 90% of the pilots based there commute, and build their schedule around commuter-friendly trips......

I could go on for days, but I don't have the time. This TA is a piece of junk, and it'll never fly.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 06:41 AM
  #13  
crewdawg52's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 744
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by WatchThis!
Seems like a page right out of the UAL playbook. Threaten to split the airline into mainline and LCC with separate lists, then completely gut the scope as a "concession" for keeping all the flying under one contract.
Steal'in took the worst part of UAL and USA consessions and made them worse for us.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 06:43 AM
  #14  
crewdawg52's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 744
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
I'm assuming that 23.9% pay decrease is what they have already taken, right. Otherwise max 320 ca would be about $105 and a dc-9 is under $100.
The 23.9% paycut we took in Nov was to last "only" 2 months. It's permanent now. No more salary cuts.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 06:50 AM
  #15  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Open Time

Perhaps if they did away with open time they could keep more pilots working instead of on furlough?

SKyHigh
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 06:57 AM
  #16  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Eros and Maxjet

Originally Posted by furloughman
Would SWA, Jetblue and Airtran fly to Europe and Asia?

Eros and Maxjet do. And lets not forget all the asian and european companies that are ready to jump in.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 07:01 AM
  #17  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Change

Originally Posted by RandyWaldron
Fireman0714, are you serious? The pilot group at NWA will never approve that TA. Not only are they financially penalized for calling in sick, the company wants to remove the Captain augmentation for long-haul 2-pilot a/c flying (B747-400 TPAC, A330 TPAC/TATL), reduce the blockholder monthly minimum and eliminate all open flying during the regular monthly bid run.

Problems? I see plenty. First of all, the elimination of full pay for sick time is not going to sit well with our most senior pilots. Imagine your 2nd sick call in a year is for a 12-day trans-pacific trip on the -400. It would be your only trip in the month and now if you call in sick you'll be paid 3/4 of what you could actually make? No dice.

The removal of the captain augmentation clause means that all First Officers on the 747-400 and A330 will now have to be type rated on the aircraft means a lot of extra training and expense, that the company cannot afford considering the rest of the cutbacks proposed.

If any open flying is eliminated during the bid run, that will reek havoc with Detroit, considering 90% of the pilots based there commute, and build their schedule around commuter-friendly trips......

I could go on for days, but I don't have the time. This TA is a piece of junk, and it'll never fly.
The changes could be very inconvenient, but so is unemployment. I don't know if the guys who are on furlough have a say but my guess is that they don't care about captain sick leave issues right now. They just want their jobs back.

SkyHigh
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 07:04 AM
  #18  
crewdawg52's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 744
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Perhaps if they did away with open time they could keep more pilots working instead of on furlough?

SKyHigh
I'll bet anything that they won't do away with open time. Right now, there are 4 pages of open trips on the DTW A320 f/0 board. 13 trips departing 8-12 march alone. Last month, they were calling up captains to sit in the f/0 seat to fly some trips. It's not the schedulers fault. That's how NWA works. It's cheaper to use reserves and let pilots to pick from the open board than to "rehire" furloughed pilots. I don't like it, but that how things are done.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 07:20 AM
  #19  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by RandyWaldron
Not only are they financially penalized for calling in sick, the company wants to remove the Captain augmentation for long-haul 2-pilot a/c flying (B747-400 TPAC, A330 TPAC/TATL), reduce the blockholder monthly minimum and eliminate all open flying during the regular monthly bid run.

I could go on for days, but I don't have the time. This TA is a piece of junk, and it'll never fly.
Much of your proposed contract changes appear to be what the UAL pilots currently work under. Some as a result of the two bankruptcy modifications and some were in place beforehand, the crew augmentation issue being one.

I’ll be very surprised if the T/A fails, but of course a lot depends on what and how your MEC handles the tentative.

Still, my $$$ is on it passing.
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 08:06 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Skyhigh....IMHO...it's not those specific items; total 39% paycut...1/2 pay for dead head....sick call policy and pay....hotel changes taht are show stoppers. If the company is able to fly 76-100 seat jets under the NEWCO banner ( and that isn't clear yet) then our brothers and sisters who are furloughed will never come back. We will be voting NO for them, not for those other items. NWA pilots are willing to fly the 70-100 seat jets for low rates, we just want to be able to do it...is that asking too much?...BTW how did your cabinet hanging go?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM
captain_drew
Major
0
08-19-2005 03:16 PM
Sir James
Major
2
03-17-2005 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices