Whats going on at Airtran?
Sorry if this is old news but I heard Airtran threatened to fire all New-Hires if the Union were to require the company to honor part of the contract. Specifically, if furloughees were to be trained as instructors the company would bring out the axe? Is this accurate? Old news? Ongoing?
Thanks Scoop |
The company said they would fire vs furlough 169 pilots. This was to circumvent the contract. The contract required that prior to any line pilot being furloughed the company would have to furlough the retired pilots working in the training center. Since the 169 were on probation the company could fire without cause. The union signed a letter of agreement that gave the company relief. The 169 got furloughed and the training center remained.
|
Originally Posted by TWAmd80
(Post 460273)
The company said they would fire vs furlough 169 pilots. This was to circumvent the contract. The contract required that prior to any line pilot being furloughed the company would have to furlough the retired pilots working in the training center. Since the 169 were on probation the company could fire without cause. The union signed a letter of agreement that gave the company relief. The 169 got furloughed and the training center remained.
|
Originally Posted by TWAmd80
(Post 460273)
The company said they would fire vs furlough 169 pilots. This was to circumvent the contract. The contract required that prior to any line pilot being furloughed the company would have to furlough the retired pilots working in the training center. Since the 169 were on probation the company could fire without cause. The union signed a letter of agreement that gave the company relief. The 169 got furloughed and the training center remained.
I still can't believe that's what they are doing, what a crappy union to sign off on that. Besides the traing dept is not going to be doing nearly as much with no new hires. Huge slap in the face from management to every pilot. |
Originally Posted by skidmark
(Post 460393)
I still can't believe that's what they are doing, what a crappy union to sign off on that.
It's easy to shoot from the easy chair here and say NPA caved - why put that provision in your contract if you'll just give relief on it once the rubber hits to road? Tough call, and what leaders have to do sometimes. Also shows the true colors of Air Tran management though. Stephen Kolski is part of that team - "he oversees . . . labor contract negotiations", "co-founded New York Air", and honed his craft under Frank Lorenzo. I think that resume speaks for itself. |
Originally Posted by Sniper
(Post 460402)
The union has to represent ALL of the pilots. It's tough to put the axe to 169 pilots just to get some old Eastern guys furloughed (any scabs in this group by chance?).
It's easy to shoot from the easy chair here and say NPA caved - why put that provision in your contract if you'll just give relief on it once the rubber hits to road? Tough call, and what leaders have to do sometimes. Also shows the true colors of Air Tran management though. Stephen Kolski is part of that team - "he oversees . . . labor contract negotiations", "co-founded New York Air", and honed his craft under Frank Lorenzo. I think that resume speaks for itself. I do see where this could pose a problem though. 169 guys fired vs. furloughed with a chance to come back. Hold the probation guys hostage. Down right sucks. |
Originally Posted by Sniper
(Post 460402)
The union has to represent ALL of the pilots. It's tough to put the axe to 169 pilots just to get some old Eastern guys furloughed (any scabs in this group by chance?).
It's easy to shoot from the easy chair here and say NPA caved - why put that provision in your contract if you'll just give relief on it once the rubber hits to road? Tough call, and what leaders have to do sometimes. Also shows the true colors of Air Tran management though. Stephen Kolski is part of that team - "he oversees . . . labor contract negotiations", "co-founded New York Air", and honed his craft under Frank Lorenzo. I think that resume speaks for itself. If they were furloughed it would be okay, fired unacceptable. |
....
Originally Posted by Sniper
(Post 460402)
The union has to represent ALL of the pilots. It's tough to put the axe to 169 pilots just to get some old Eastern guys furloughed (any scabs in this group by chance?).
It's easy to shoot from the easy chair here and say NPA caved - why put that provision in your contract if you'll just give relief on it once the rubber hits to road? Tough call, and what leaders have to do sometimes. Also shows the true colors of Air Tran management though. Stephen Kolski is part of that team - "he oversees . . . labor contract negotiations", "co-founded New York Air", and honed his craft under Frank Lorenzo. I think that resume speaks for itself. Anyway, its all water under the bridge now and its all done. I will say that everybody I flew with there was a class act and really wants the place and culture there to change, its just a huge battle to take on. |
Originally Posted by Dwight Schrute
(Post 460470)
Amen, Amen, Amen. I am part of the 169, .....
I am asking because I am in the "pool" at AT ... trying to decide what I will do whenever they start up new-hire training again. You can respond here or via PM ... your call. Thanks! :) |
Right now, the 169 are being told 2-3 years for recall. We have deferred all our new a/c deliveries until October of 2010.
I find it hard to believe they would keep a 'pool' for the duration of the furlough. Industry average for furloughed pilots returning after one year or more is about 12% (APA stats). Most of the guys I have spoken too will not be coming back (myself included). |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands