Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.

User Tag List

Post Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2009, 10:04 AM   #1  
Thread Starter
vagabond's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 7,800
Default Oil prices whipsaw Alaska Air Group

From Tacoma News Tribune:

Alaska Air Group released results Thursday for its fourth quarter and the full year that are either distressing or encouraging, depending on how you view them.
The parent company of SeaTac’s Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air showed either a $16.4 million profit for the quarter or a $75.2 million loss.

The difference is what accountants call “special items,” expense and income items that occurred during the quarter because of special, infrequent developments such as radical shifts in oil prices, corporate restructuring and the unscheduled retirement of uneconomical jets.

The company, in its corporate earnings release, led with the $75.2 million loss, but quickly followed with news of the $16.4 million profit.

Alaska Air’s chairman, Bill Ayer, emphasized the profit.

“In a year of unprecedented volatility that included soaring fuel prices and an economic meltdown, we were pleased to eke out a small profit for 2008, excluding special items, and be one of only a few major airlines to do so,” he said in a statement.

Chief gremlin in this good news-bad news scenario were oil prices that rocketed upward to $147 a barrel in midsummer and then quickly fell to the mid-$30-a-barrel level by December.

Airlines trying to guard against predicted oil prices of as high as $200 a barrel bought options, or hedges, to protect themselves from that contingency only to see oil prices free-fall below their hedge values.

Even airlines such as Southwest and Alaska, which had played the oil price game successfully for years, accruing benefits to their bottom lines, got caught in the quirky behavior.

At Alaska, the oil price fluctuations brought these after-tax charges in the fourth quarter: mark-to-market fuel hedge adjustments of $50.3 million and realized losses because of the early termination of fuel hedges for 2009 and 2010 of $31.3 million.

Passenger demand and pricing also went unpredictable in 2008. The year began with steady demand that allowed airlines including Alaska to raise prices through midyear. Then the banking and economic crisis sent business travel down the drain in the later months of the year and frightened leisure travelers into canceling trips.

This whipsaw effect sent prices tumbling again.

At Alaska, mainline passenger traffic declined in the fourth quarter by 4.4 percent, but the company moved quickly and cut capacity by 7.1 percent.

The result was fuller planes in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared with the same quarter in 2007. The percentage of seats filled increased by 2.3 percentage points to 77 percent in the fourth quarter.

Stock market and investment declines and instability made major changes in the airline holding company’s debt-to-capital ratio, which increased to 81 percent at year’s end compared with 70 percent at the end of 2007.

Alaska attributed much of that change to an increase in the company’s unfunded pension liability, which increased some $300 million because of a decline in the value of the pension plan’s assets.

Revenue slid 3.1 percent to $827.1 million, compared with $853.4 million recorded in the same period a year earlier. Analysts had predicted revenue of $819.7 million for the fourth quarter.

For all of 2008, Alaska Air Group said it lost $135.9 million, or $3.74 a share, compared with a profit of $124.3 million, or $3.07 a share, for all of 2007. Twelve-month revenue rose to $3.7 billion, compared with $3.5 billion recorded for all of 2007. Analysts had predicted revenue of $3.62 billion for 2008.

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air together serve more than 90 cities through their network in Alaska, Hawaii, the continental U.S., Canada and Mexico.

John Gillie: 253-597-8663

Seattle-Tacoma News, Weather, Sports, Jobs, Homes and Cars from The News Tribune, the South Puget Sound’s Destination | Tacoma and Pierce County Business News
vagabond is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 10:14 PM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
Moose's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 387

It is not all that bad Vagabond!

Alaska Air Group benefits from cautious bet on fuel prices - Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle):

Friday, January 23, 2009
Alaska Air Group benefits from cautious bet on fuel prices
Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle) - by Steve Wilhelm Staff Writer

Cheaper jet fuel prices are lifting Alaska Air Group more than some competitors, largely because the company has historically utilized more conservative fuel hedge tactics, which are paying off today.

Alaska Air Group, the parent of Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air, bought “call options” giving it the opportunity to buy fuel at a set price. While these require higher upfront payments, they didn’t obligate the airline to buy the fuel at the hedged prices.

Other airlines, including United and Southwest, have used another form of hedging called “swaps” or “collars,” that commits them to buy fuel at certain rates. While these are essentially contracts and are less expensive up front, they run a higher risk of creating large fuel cost penalties when fuel prices drop steeply.

On Jan. 21, UAL Corp., which owns United Airlines, reported fourth quarter cash losses of $370 million from fuel hedging, as well as another $566 million in noncash losses from hedging.

While Alaska Air Group on Oct. 23 reported $218 million in noncash losses from hedging in the third quarter, the fact that it used call options meant that it hasn’t had to pay out cash to cover hedging commitments as United, Southwest, and other carriers have had to do.

The company will issue its fourth quarter numbers on Jan. 29.

“It cost modestly more up front, but it’s a more prudent approach,” said Donald Garvett, Seattle-based aviation consultant for SH & E Inc., a global consultant headquartered in Fairfax, Va. , about Alaska’s call-option approach to hedging. “I think Alaska has done one of the smartest jobs throughout this period of extreme fuel volatility of any airline.”

So while Southwest, United and other airlines are posting warnings to investors about the costs of their hedges, Alaska is enjoying the benefit of the lower price, without as much added cost.

“No question about it, the decline is very positive for Alaska Air Group,” said Brandon Pedersen, Alaska Air Group vice president of finance.

This is somewhat of a turnabout from the period of peak fuel prices in mid-2008, when Southwest’s approach to hedging was saving it more money, and when some criticized Alaska for being too conservative.

Alaska’s fuel prices dropped by about $2.40 a gallon to about $1.60 a gallon in the fourth quarter from last summer’s peak, saving the company about $182 million on 76 million gallons used, Pedersen said.

Pedersen estimates the company paid the equivalent of 24 cents a gallon for its hedging program, which in this time of lower fuel prices is proving to be of no value. But since the current fuel prices are below the amount it paid, Alaska still will come out ahead.

“Alaska recognized that hedging is not speculation, it’s a form of matching risk and volatility — it’s like insurance,” Garvett said.

Fuel is a big part of airline costs, accounting for upward of 40 percent of operating expenses, Pedersen said. Every dollar in the per-barrel price of oil produces a $10 million change in Alaska’s expenses. A barrel contains 42 U.S. gallons.

Alaska Air Group’s approach to hedging is more expensive upfront, Pedersen said, but it was something the airline could afford, given its relatively good cash position.

“Some might say, because of the cost of coverage over the long term, ours might be more expensive, but it doesn’t expose us to the kind of volatility and risk that other approaches might carry with them,” he said. “We’re certainly faring better now, because we’re not in a position where we’re having to give back or pay substantially.”

Looking ahead, Alaska is lowering its 2009 hedges, from earlier hedging half of its projected fuel consumption at $107 a barrel, to the current $76 a barrel.

Part of this has been accomplished by terminating some original hedges and replacing them with new ones, which has cost Alaska about $35 million, Pedersen said. But he added this will give the company more pricing stability moving ahead.

The current poll of analysts by Thomson Financial Network estimate that Alaska Air Group will earn $3.33 per share in 2009, compared with an estimated loss of 32 cents a share for 2008.

This illustrates that even though the company’s passenger volume will be reduced in 2009, lower fuel prices will allow it to operate profitably, Pedersen said.

[email protected] | 206.876.5427
Moose is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 09:27 PM   #3  
Line Holder
turbodriver's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 76

And we're still getting furloughed......

Long live Alaska Spirit!
turbodriver is offline  

Post Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oil Prices Could Hit $80 Next 2 Years SWAjet Major 14 11-29-2014 05:31 PM
Delta-Alaska, Talking heads report... Green Banana Major 109 12-01-2010 09:32 AM
Deflation jungle Money Talk 7 01-25-2009 06:02 AM
Alaska Air Group Announces Changes to Strengthen Senior Leadership ArcticDog Major 8 12-26-2008 08:08 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:04 AM.