![]() |
UAL Ordering 150 Airplanes?
From the WSJ
(Reuters) - UAL Corp's (NasdaqGS:UAUA - News) United Airlines has asked Boeing Co (NYSE:BA - News) and Airbus (Paris:EAD.PA - News) to propose competing bids for up to 150 new airliners, the Wall Street Journal reported on its website. The deal could be worth more than $10 billion for the two aircraft makers, the paper said. By asking for competing bids, UAL Corp is hoping to obtain better terms than might otherwise be available, the paper said, citing people familiar with the situation. (Reporting by Ajay Kamalakaran in Bangalore; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman) |
Just in time for our contract negotiations... shocker. I'll believe it when I'm sitting in one of them.
|
Airline ordering airplanes, means nothing. As fast as they order them they defer them due to economic reasons.
I really hope UAL takes delivery of them. |
Ya... I'll believe it when I see it! UAL management ACTUALLY wanting to expand the airline? Sounds too good to be true!
|
As important as how many they are ordering is how many they are retiring.
|
It's about time. I see B787's and B737NG's en mass coming in 2010-2015
|
Originally Posted by Sir James
(Post 622502)
It's about time. I see B787's and B737NG's en mass coming in 2010-2015
************************************************** ******************************* UAL Corp's (UAUA - News) United Airlines has asked Boeing Co (BA - News) and Airbus (Paris:EAD.PA - News) to propose competing bids to supply up to 150 new airliners, the Wall Street Journal said on its website on Thursday. The deal could be worth more than $10 billion for the two aircraft makers, the paper said. United sent a formal request to Boeing and Airbus on Tuesday, the paper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The request focuses on replacing many of the 111 aircraft in United's wide-body fleet, as well as some of its 97 aging Boeing 757 narrow-body planes, the sources told the paper. United could sign a major order as early as the fall if Boeing or Airbus agree to certain conditions, the paper said. However, the financing arranged by the manufacturer that doesn't eat into United's cash would be the most crucial, the paper said, citing people familiar with the matter. United has hired aviation consulting firm Seabury Group LLC to help it negotiate with the plane makers, the paper said. A spokesman at Airbus said he was not aware of this particular deal but added the firm was talking to its customers all the time. Reuters could not immediately reach United or Boeing for comments outside regular hour |
When was the last year United made money?
Where is the $10 billion coming from? ....The employees again? Don't get me wrong. I have a a couple friends pounding the pavement at UAL and would like to see them back at work. 150 airplanes just sounds improbable. Go big or go home I guess. |
Originally Posted by FlyinPiker
(Post 622503)
************************************************** *******************************
UAL Corp's (UAUA - News) United Airlines has asked Boeing Co (BA - News) and Airbus (Paris:EAD.PA - News) to propose competing bids to supply up to 150 new airliners, the Wall Street Journal said on its website on Thursday. United has hired aviation consulting firm Seabury Group LLC to help it negotiate with the plane makers, the paper said. |
They have to put in an order some time unless they just want to run old airplanes until they shutter the doors from mismanagement. Nothing says they have to start taking airframes soon, but ordering is easy and ordering now may very well actually be a rare piece of good management if they can get better deals than they could before. Boeing and Airbus are getting lots of cancellations so they may be in the mood to cut some better deals. There also isn't anything that says United has to sign on the dotted line if they don't get terms the terms they want now. I doubt the current management group will be around by the time deliveries are actually made and I wish the employees luck on flying them for a viable airline that the current jokers in management seem to be doing their best to destroy.
|
Actually, after listening to Glenn-2 N's little tidbit this morning, I now actually believe we will order and take delivery of those airplanes. He will park 200, and buy 150. Sounds just like business as usual at good ole' UAL.
|
Don't worry I'm sure this pilot group will happily give up another 30 or 40% to pay for it all.;)
|
Originally Posted by FlyinPiker
(Post 622503)
Probably more CAL fleet alignment with 787's, 777-300's, 737-900's, etc.
|
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
(Post 622705)
You don't ask Airbus for airplanes as part of fleet alignment with CAL.
|
I heard the orders were a combined order from the Aurora, Revelle, and Monogram aircraft model companies... assembly required and batteries not included.:D
|
Originally Posted by OlyRob
(Post 622715)
But you do if you are trying to leverage two suppliers against each other to get a better price...
|
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
(Post 622705)
You don't ask Airbus for airplanes as part of fleet alignment with CAL.
Will be interesting to see how pitting the two aircraft manufactures will be this time. CAL's relationship with Boeing without a doubt was established when Gordon came over to CAL years back from Boeing....something that CAL has worked are to maintain thus being an all Boeing Fleet. Besides Seabury possibly being the "consultant" on the deal, has anyone heard intel on who is going to be financing this order???....No secret, not a really easy to just secure this type of order as it was in the past....especially when Glenn's at the helm.:eek: Time will tell...:cool: |
As many have pointed out, an important metric for pilots is total fleet size.
Doing the math on this reported order, the net United fleet size will be less than it now, and about a third of what it was 10 years ago. The gutting of United as an aircraft operator continues. this quite is from another forum, but it does apply to ALL pilots negotiating a CBA: I am a pilot, I fly airplanes. I can fly old ones just as well as new ones. What I demand is to be compensated reasonably for my professional knowledge and the license I carry that allows me to fly those airplanes. Buying corporate assets is a corporate decision made at the director level. It should have NOTHING to do with how our contract is negotiated. Do not look at this bright shiny new piece of equipment being dangled in front of you. If you do, you are taking your eye off the real issue, a reasonable contract. If we fail to concentrate on what is really important, the contract, we will likely find more of our wallets missing while we are admiring the proposed new jets. Seabury APG | Profiles Main |
|
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 622811)
|
Originally Posted by alwaysflying
(Post 622443)
Airline ordering airplanes, means nothing. As fast as they order them they defer them due to economic reasons.
I really hope UAL takes delivery of them. And why would they do that....quit being so negative dude. |
Can United make it?
Other than some company buying them how can united make it? They have shrunk so much there route structure has to suffer.
|
DAL was down and out a few years ago as well. Our management team under Leo Mullins did a textbook job of ruining a great brand. During BK, our management team restructured and we got some incredible people - Glen Hauenstein and Bob Cortelyou. They completely redid our network and in my opinion were the two most responsible for DAL's turnaround.
My point is that UAL could turnaround if given competent management and sword that the employees could rally behind. Under Tilton's tenure its unlikely. But a new team could definitely take advantage of what I believe is the best Hub network of any legacy and make it shine again. Time will tell, but DAL is a vastly different beast now than we were four years ago. |
The "announcement" yesterday, I am sure is just another piece of the puzzle coming together....interesting that this fall is when the order is to take place...the same time CAL officially enters the STAR alliance...and CAL has the orders for the narrowbodies. If in the end a merger takes place....everything will be in order when it is announced.
This is not by chance this time frame is the way it is. |
united route structure
Delta has the best route structure not United. They used to have 10,000 pilots and will be down to 5500. They are Smaller than SWA.
|
And I suppose you can't see how if they were to merge that they cannot come in looking too big.....think about it. Add UAL and CAL...what do you come up with?...11,300.
Similar to the numbers at DAL AFTER the merger. |
Lets make one thing clear....
UAL did not order a single airframe. |
With the US currency devaluation Boeing will get the upper hand. And if they are not pitting Boeing against Airbus then they are not being "good" businessmen.
|
Originally Posted by cal73
(Post 622523)
When was the last year United made money?
|
Originally Posted by cal73
(Post 623785)
Lets make one thing clear....
UAL did not order a single airframe. At this point in time I don't think there are any other major US carriers with bids on 150 airplane orders? Certainly not CAL. This will hopefully be a all encompassing change for UAL and perhaps set some new standards for mainline flying in the future with a narrowbody refreshment coming afterwards. Perhaps this is my misconstrued concept, but at UAL we have had some large sine curves in the past few years of bad and good news. In fact the dips probably out pace the peaks. Why is it impossible to enjoy the moment and perhaps think positively about our future for 5 minutes without be cast upon by those that think all good news is wrapped in bad. I would think anyone that is at CAL could appreciate a turnaround. Look at the history of CAL and there are some signifcant close calls with extinction. The right leadership was able to correct what was one of the worse carriers in existence. Good for you guys climbing out of the grave. Why not allow someone else to do the same? L |
Originally Posted by Lambourne
(Post 623835)
No they did not place an order. However, to believe that this is the "first" time the company and the manufacturers are entering into talks would be extremely naive. Much like the auto industry, the airframe manufacturers are in search of orders. This buying in the trough and taking delivery in the peak is a good strategy and hopefully we will see the airplanes on the ramp at some point.
At this point in time I don't think there are any other major US carriers with bids on 150 airplane orders? Certainly not CAL. This will hopefully be a all encompassing change for UAL and perhaps set some new standards for mainline flying in the future with a narrowbody refreshment coming afterwards. Perhaps this is my misconstrued concept, but at UAL we have had some large sine curves in the past few years of bad and good news. In fact the dips probably out pace the peaks. Why is it impossible to enjoy the moment and perhaps think positively about our future for 5 minutes without be cast upon by those that think all good news is wrapped in bad. I would think anyone that is at CAL could appreciate a turnaround. Look at the history of CAL and there are some signifcant close calls with extinction. The right leadership was able to correct what was one of the worse carriers in existence. Good for you guys climbing out of the grave. Why not allow someone else to do the same? L Joe |
United
Do you read marketwatch?
|
Originally Posted by chris1987
(Post 623856)
Do you read marketwatch?
You can read?:) |
Originally Posted by cal73
(Post 623785)
Lets make one thing clear....
UAL did not order a single airframe. Nope...not yet. I don't think anyone said they did. |
Originally Posted by Lambourne
(Post 623835)
No they did not place an order. However, to believe that this is the "first" time the company and the manufacturers are entering into talks would be extremely naive. Much like the auto industry, the airframe manufacturers are in search of orders. This buying in the trough and taking delivery in the peak is a good strategy and hopefully we will see the airplanes on the ramp at some point.
At this point in time I don't think there are any other major US carriers with bids on 150 airplane orders? Certainly not CAL. This will hopefully be a all encompassing change for UAL and perhaps set some new standards for mainline flying in the future with a narrowbody refreshment coming afterwards. Perhaps this is my misconstrued concept, but at UAL we have had some large sine curves in the past few years of bad and good news. In fact the dips probably out pace the peaks. Why is it impossible to enjoy the moment and perhaps think positively about our future for 5 minutes without be cast upon by those that think all good news is wrapped in bad. I would think anyone that is at CAL could appreciate a turnaround. Look at the history of CAL and there are some signifcant close calls with extinction. The right leadership was able to correct what was one of the worse carriers in existence. Good for you guys climbing out of the grave. Why not allow someone else to do the same? L And that is why they must join the STAR alliance or extinction may be a very REAL possibility. They were going to have to join an alliance somewhere....they decided on STAR and United.....period. |
Originally Posted by flap
(Post 623876)
You can read?:)
|
They were going to have to join an alliance somewhere....they decided on STAR and United.....period. |
Originally Posted by Lambourne
(Post 623835)
No they did not place an order. However, to believe that this is the "first" time the company and the manufacturers are entering into talks would be extremely naive. Much like the auto industry, the airframe manufacturers are in search of orders. This buying in the trough and taking delivery in the peak is a good strategy and hopefully we will see the airplanes on the ramp at some point.
At this point in time I don't think there are any other major US carriers with bids on 150 airplane orders? Certainly not CAL. This will hopefully be a all encompassing change for UAL and perhaps set some new standards for mainline flying in the future with a narrowbody refreshment coming afterwards. Perhaps this is my misconstrued concept, but at UAL we have had some large sine curves in the past few years of bad and good news. In fact the dips probably out pace the peaks. Why is it impossible to enjoy the moment and perhaps think positively about our future for 5 minutes without be cast upon by those that think all good news is wrapped in bad. I would think anyone that is at CAL could appreciate a turnaround. Look at the history of CAL and there are some signifcant close calls with extinction. The right leadership was able to correct what was one of the worse carriers in existence. Good for you guys climbing out of the grave. Why not allow someone else to do the same? L I understand your points in the wake of some "positive/good news" on the UAL campus, I'm sure this is some welcomed news to the pilot group over your way. In reading on this forum, and some other posting sources, some thoughts have brought up the idea "Can UAL secure financing on such a bold order during the present state"??.....or "Is this a ploy to come to the pilot group to ask for further 'cuts' in using these orders as a negociation carrot in contract developments"? Who knows the real answers to these question, but they could honestly be valid questions/concerns to keep in mind as the pie in the sky is relished. Your commnet in regard to aircraft orders..."Is there any other Major Carrier with bids out on 150 aircraft"?? Good point, but as others on this forum are quick to point out, orders mean NOTHING. You can order all day long, but until the call of V1, rotate with UAL painted on the side means nada. Your are CORRECT in saying CAL does NOT have 150 on order, but I can sure as certain tell you CAL HAS been taking delivery of their NG's....their "V1, Rotate" smell test has passed too :cool: The deliveries have replaced some of the older platforms, no doubt there (Not dramatically increasing over all fleet size). These deliveries have been coming steadyso for 36+ months and going. We are also getting more 777's to be delivered later this year, and into next year as well.....In the end, a company can ORDER all you want....just show me the deliveries. bringing to fruition the full equation. Agreed.....your company's success is tied largely to the leadership. When Gorden and his team arrived years back, CAL was in horrible shape bar none!!!:confused: Can UAL, or any other carrier do so with the proper leadership, I DONT see why not. Hanging one's hat on 150 aircraft orders will right UAL's direction, I see that as being hard to believe.....why put the cart infront of the horse??? I dont know too many people that would be comfy with Glenn at the helm trying to right the ship. If UAL is going to make the turn around like some carriers have done in the past.....ordering aircraft with a SOUND plan can very well be the start UAL needs, but 'you' BEST look beyond Glenn running the show. Best of luck and keep the faith. SC |
[quote=contrail67;623881]And that is why they must join the STAR alliance or extinction may be a very REAL possibility. They were going to have to join an alliance somewhere....they decided on STAR and United.....period.[/quote]
Wow...beyond narrow minded....there is A LOT more to the Star than UAL:cool: |
Originally Posted by chris1987
(Post 623883)
flame baite
jusst laffing at yore spellyng in yore posts |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands