Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Politics and Ignorance with Air France 447?? >

Politics and Ignorance with Air France 447??

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Politics and Ignorance with Air France 447??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2009, 06:52 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 842
Default

of course there are politics involved. who ever is at fault not only will have to pay the resulting lawsuits---all 230+ of them. Also they have to pay for one of the most expensive recovery/investigations of all time. Its always about the money.
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:21 PM
  #12  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by timjones View Post
Why do we keep hearing that the problem with the 447 most likely will never be found, when it is becoming obvious what the cause is (cough cough ... Known faulty design of the A330's ADIRU)?? Also, why does the media seem completely ignore to even a reference to the Quantas Flight(s) of 72 (or 71 for that matter), which would seem extremely relevant to the 447 investigation??
AF447 and all AF A330s use(d) Honeywell ADIRUs, not the Litton/Northrop used by Qantas. If you had done some research you could have known this prior to your flaming post on the forum.

Perhaps that is why the word Ignorance is in the Title of this thread?

Last edited by Nosmo King; 06-19-2009 at 02:42 PM.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 273
Default

While I completely agree with the original poster, one has to ask himself/herself if it was too much for Boeing to ground the 777 after the BA, AA, DL rollbacks?

Maybe more pressure needs to be put on all these events.
schone is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:58 PM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: DA50 both
Posts: 9
Default No typos

Originally Posted by Brian Wilson View Post
I agree look at his grammar. Good sentence structure, complete paragraphs, and no typo's definitely not a pilot.
There are no typos but I did spot an omitted word, tsk tsk. In the 3rd paragraph, first line there is a missing "about", i.e. caring <about> the safety. Even that phrasing is somewhat stilted. This is not a journalist who speaks (writes) native English.
SSilky is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:51 PM
  #15  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by schone View Post
While I completely agree with the original poster, one has to ask himself/herself if it was too much for Boeing to ground the 777 after the BA, AA, DL rollbacks?

Maybe more pressure needs to be put on all these events.

Didn't a 777 also have a pushover event in Austrailia as well?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:10 AM
  #16  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

Hey Mr. Jones ,how about asking AF about GPS and the lack of said system?

JAPW.
Ally
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 06:55 AM
  #17  
Snakes & Nape
 
Phantom Flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B-767 Captain
Posts: 775
Cool Wrong Tree

Originally Posted by timjones View Post
Why do we keep hearing that the problem with the 447 most likely will never be found, when it is becoming obvious what the cause is (cough cough ... Known faulty design of the A330's ADIRU)?? Also, why does the media seem completely ignore to even a reference to the Quantas Flight(s) of 72 (or 71 for that matter), which would seem extremely relevant to the 447 investigation??

I guess my question is this.... Does economics matter more than our butts in the seats of these complex (and sometimes glitch prone) contraptions, or would a temporary grounding just be too economically painful for Airbus to bear??
Since you haven't identified yourself, I'd say you were barking up the wrong tree. Since when did the ADIRU become the prominent focus of this investigation. Yes, the black boxes will be crucial to a successful accident investigation, IF they are ever found. Why not key on the vertical stabilizer and the rudder attach points along with the hydraulic control of the rudder itself.

As for the economics, yes, it's cheaper to play the risk management game and keep the A-300 series flying than ground the entire family of aircraft to fix a design flaw. When we get to the point that too many people have been killed by a design flaw or series of flaws, action will be taken. Until then, it's the cost of doing business. Tragic but true.

G'Day Mates
Phantom Flyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices