![]() |
Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
(Post 681688)
Is it Airbusses or Airbii? I'm always confused on that... After all, it's 1 bus and 2 busses so why should it be 1 Airbus and 2 Airbii? Airbii sounds weird to me? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 681456)
Jet Blue has purchased Delta. The Delta guys are getting stapled to the bottom of the list. It's true because you just read it on the net.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 681456)
Jet Blue has purchased Delta. The Delta guys are getting stapled to the bottom of the list. It's true because you just read it on the net.
Nu |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 681739)
I would guess most Airbusses are bi.
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 681739)
I would guess most Airbusses are bi.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 681586)
Any ideas where to put it, haha? Last I checked there wasn't a glut of available real estate at that craphole.
|
oh yes. (i need 10 characters)
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 682031)
Actually, there is a TON of real estate available there. There are lots of old maintenance hangars that are one bulldozer away from the ground. And it wouldn't take a particularly skilled operator to do that either. Take a good look around next time you are there, and you'll see what I'm talking about.
One of the options looked at would have done exactly that. The new terminal would have gone in on the North side of the airport where cargo is now handled. The check in area would have been Jet Blue's old terminal. Once you checked in there would have been trains under 13l/31R to get you to the main termainal. I think the idea was dropped because the cost of the tunnels would have been huge. JFK is built on reclaimed marshland. Not easy to tunnel in. The cargo area's don't have the roads and infrastructure for a terminal and check in area. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 682239)
One of the options looked at would have done exactly that. The new terminal would have gone in on the North side of the airport where cargo is now handled. The check in area would have been Jet Blue's old terminal. Once you checked in there would have been trains under 13l/31R to get you to the main termainal. I think the idea was dropped because the cost of the tunnels would have been huge. JFK is built on reclaimed marshland. Not easy to tunnel in. The cargo area's don't have the roads and infrastructure for a terminal and check in area.
With that being said, a Terminal 4 set-up, with two taxilanes between the fingers, would allow a lot of options to get in and out. The only thing that doesn't work is our current set-up at LA and MB. KK is slightly less convoluted, but there is at least one misguided soul work ramp tower who is determined to make it just as screwed up as the rest. It's the guy who likes to tell you to push back at a 45 abeam your own gate. |
Originally Posted by B7ER Guy
(Post 681815)
Does that mean we get to ditch the hat?:D
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands