Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

End ALPA Magazine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2010, 07:24 AM
  #11  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

OUCH!!

That's some serious 'pie in the face' for ALPA.....especially when they personified him in the fashion did.

Will be interested to hear what other B.S. that cat served up during his "15 minutes" of fame. What a shame.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:34 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed View Post
I agree. ALPA has always been the senior wide body CAs' Union. They have not represented the interest of junior mainline and regional pilots' interest. ie. Age 65, Scope giveaway to subsidize senior CA pay and benefits. Don't get me started on age 65 rule, which by the way passed with speed I have never seen before. Just look at the crawling speed with which Crew Duty and Rest requirement rule is being handled. Compare that to the 3 month it took to pass the Age 65 rule.

I agree with Sourgrapes that it is pathetic and disgusting that almost everyone at ALPA makes over $100,000. ALPA travel specialist makes over $100,000. This is a clerk who makes phone calls to make your travel reservations and hands you the travel itinerary. ALPA bigwigs probably makes in excess of $250,000 doing nothing but telling everyone what a great job they are doing.

Our union dues are way too expensive and we, junior pilots, get nothing of value in return. I toss ALPA magazine into the garbage where it belongs, although that is one expensive magazine subscription. I am also nauseated by constant self congratulating articles touting how great Prater is. All those fat cats needs to go back to line flying and do some real work instead of sitting on their fat behind at some fancy restaurant spending our union dues, pretending to conduct a ALPA Union meeting.
There always seems to be revisionist history regarding Age 65 when people don't fully tell the story of its evolution. But, people have their opinions and they seem set in stone. I myself was/still am against age 65, however ALPA hardly "caved" on this issue that was running through Congress at lightning speed while the FAA was trying to keep it at a snail's pace.

As far as ALPA staff salaries go, while I agree that their salaries appear exhorbitant to many of us, you do realize that ALPA staff are represented by their own union? Don't know the exact name but there are two different ALPA staff units within the union who negotiate and have even gone on strike within the past five years. They are like you (workers) and ALPA National is considered their employer (management). You get what you negotiate. We all hate it when a passenger says, "you guys are a bunch of over paid bus drivers anyway." I won't compare apples to oranges.

If you have a problem with the pay that some of the ALPA VPs and the president gets, attend a union meeting, introduce a resolution to change the C&BL to change the pay structure of the ALPA leaders. It appears the outrage is there based on everything I hear from people on here and flying the line so it should pass and move up the ladder right?

To me, ALPA Aeromedical and representation in termination alone is worth the dues. There are many pilots out there, including the junior/young guy, who will tell you how valuable these services are if they have ever had to be used.

I won't argue against what some have said regarding the latest magazine debacle. I read the story and understand some have brought up inaccuracies within it. Obviously some vetting and fact checking might have been overlooked and THAT is what should be addressed first.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:40 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
goaround2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: ERJ145 Captain
Posts: 473
Default

As a proud ALPA pilot, I still agree with everyone here...the magazine needs to go. It's a waste of resources, and in recent time it's turned into a propaganda flier.

There's typically some useful safety information buried in the midst of all said propaganda. However, that information can easily be disseminated via email, just as the LEC and MEC information.

Away with the paper waste.
goaround2000 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:45 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
There always seems to be revisionist history regarding Age 65 when people don't fully tell the story of its evolution. But, people have their opinions and they seem set in stone. I myself was/still am against age 65, however ALPA hardly "caved" on this issue that was running through Congress at lightning speed while the FAA was trying to keep it at a snail's pace. ...
The membership said no; Alpa said well we cant stop it so lets make sure it applies retroactively to all the over 60 S/O. What is your definition of not caving?

I myself thought the age change was inevitable. But ALPA could have worked to make it less career damaging. Simple solution, phase in the age change over 10 years. Everyone equally unhappy, everyone equally screwed. No 5 years of bonus pay (at the top of the payscale) for one demographic no 5 years of stagnation for the rest of the crewforce.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:51 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
The membership said no; Alpa said well we cant stop it so lets make sure it applys retroactively to all the over 60 S/O. What is your definition of not caving?

I myself thought the age change was inevatiable. But ALPA could have worked to make it less career damaging. Simple solution phase in the age change over 10 years. Everyone equally unhappy, everyone equally screwed. No 5 years of bonus pay (at the top of the payscale) for one demographic no 5 years of stagnation for the rest of the crewforce.
+1! You beat me to it. My sentiments exactly. Yeah, I'd say ALPA not only caved in but endorsed it behind the scene.

Those who benefitted the most from the Age 60 rule now benefit the most from the Age 65 rule. The senior widebody CAs got to where they are because of the Age 60 rule which forced age 60 pilots to retire, giving them the room to move up. Now, with the Age 65 rule in place, we, the junior pilots have no place to move up. What's next, Age 70 rule? I read Europe is considering just that.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:57 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
sparerib11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: on the street
Posts: 39
Default

ALPA Magazine = Mostly pictures of guys and gals sitting around a hotel conference room.

The exception is something like the Martins debacle from the April 2010 issue.

I'd like to see more practical safety/technical content.... or as some have said, ALPA should go completely electronic.
sparerib11 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:58 AM
  #17  
captnmajic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
To me, ALPA Aeromedical and representation in termination alone is worth the dues. There are many pilots out there, including the junior/young guy, who will tell you how valuable these services are if they have ever had to be used.
Unfortunately this is not true. I know a guy who was threatened with termination at his airline several years ago and ALPA washed their hands of him. Despite this pilot's innocence his ALPA rep refused to provide any assistance and he was eventually forced to hire his own attorney to fight for his career. This guy ultimately prevailed against his company and was reinstated, but throughout the entire process ALPA did nothing whatsoever to assist him despite the fact he had been an ALPA member in good standing for nearly 20 years.
 
Old 03-30-2010, 08:32 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DashDriverYV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Default

The magazine is just a way for the reps to pat themselves on the back. I don't think I've ever read it and went "Gee that was helpful". They need to take a chapter out of AOPA magazine.
DashDriverYV is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:55 AM
  #19  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

It's been about 10 year since ALPA closed down it's union print shop in Herndon with the promise of web distribution via alpa.org replacing the LEC/MEC printed newsletters.

If you need a progress report on the efficacy of that move, just take a look at your LEC or MEC web site. Ask your communications committee chair how easy they feel it is to deploy and maintain a local web site. Ask them how much support they receive from ALPA national.

Keep in mind that ALPA uses an open source software called Dot Net Nuke (ie. free to use, and without license fees) for the ALPA.org site. Dot Net Nuke (DNN) is referred to as somewhat of a bad joke in many developer communities due to it's limitations and kludge design.

If you don't like the magazine, you'll absolutely HATE the web site. Granted, the alpa site has recently received a face lift, but keep in mind that this was done by a team of alpa IT staff members (most paid 100K +) who didn't improve functionality as much as they simply put lipstick on a pig.

Just like executive pay, any change to alpa's online presence will have to come from local resolution(s) to outsource the IT department. After a decade, it's clear that they aren't going to step up on their own.

Last edited by HSLD; 03-30-2010 at 09:09 AM.
HSLD is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:06 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
Just like executive pay, any change to alpa's online presence will have to come from local resolution(s) to outsource the IT department. After a decade, it's clear that they aren't going to step up on their own.
I can't think of a single local resolution that has been acted on my our MEC.

I know why no one attends LEC meetings. It is a waste of time.
Ad Lib is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
0
01-19-2010 07:47 PM
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
par8head
Major
1
08-04-2008 06:46 AM
Skyone
Major
1
07-31-2008 05:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices