RockBottom

Airline merger rumors flying
Speculation unites United, Continental
MARK SKERTIC
Chicago Tribune

CHICAGO - Someday soon, there may be fewer airlines listed on airport arrival and departure screens.

Which names could disappear is the subject of intense industry speculation. But with most of the larger carriers again reporting profits, merger-and-acquisition talk is gaining momentum.

Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, both operating in bankruptcy, often are seen as the two most likely targets for a suitor. But United Airlines, Continental Airlines and US Airways also have come up as possible partners.

Even last week's threats of terrorist attacks haven't dimmed interest in consolidation, although stock prices have fallen since the alerts were issued.

In a note Monday, Calyon Securities analyst Ray Neidl advised that a Continental-United marriage is among those some speculate would make sense.

Neidl cautioned that it may be too early in the industry's economic recovery to begin mergers, but he added that a deal between United and Continental, healthy airlines with largely different market strengths, "would set off a chain reaction in the industry."

The industry is primed to contract, airline analyst Michael Roach said.

"There are too many legacy carriers. ... Everyone agrees there are too many," he said. "As a result, it's possible to imagine almost any kind of combination."

That could include combining either Northwest or Delta with a healthier operator. Or some analysts predict that Northwest and Delta could merge, hoping that the resulting carrier would be stronger financially.

Good arguments can be made for those moves and more, but each also brings unique problems, said Joe Brancatelli, editor and publisher of a newsletter for business travelers.

"They all make sense, but I see problems with all combinations," he said. "There's a lot of stuff that goes on when you try to merge cultures and corporations."

In 1980, in the era before airline deregulation, Pan American World Airways and National Airlines merged. The plan was intended to give Pan Am the domestic-route network it lacked, increasing passenger traffic to its international routes. The deal made sense when looking at route maps, but expensive problems quickly emerged.

"The fleets were completely incompatible. The systems were completely incompatible," said airline analyst Robert Mann. "And they had paid a real premium ... to control National. They had paid too much and done it without taking a real pencil to the cost of integration or the real time frame for integration."

The National Airlines name disappeared soon after it was acquired by Pan Am. Pan Am survived about a decade longer, declaring bankruptcy in 1991. In its effort to stave off financial problems in its final years, it sold many of its valuable assets, including Asian routes, to United Airlines.

In addition to routes, fleets and operations, other challenges come when combining airlines. Most of the larger carriers have unionized work forces. Reconciling sometimes vastly different labor deals can take years.

American Airlines bought Trans World Airlines in 2001, after that carrier sought bankruptcy protection. The deal saved the jobs of more than 20,000 TWA workers. But they lost seniority when they were integrated into American's unions, resulting in many being among the first to be laid off when the industry began suffering financially a few years later.

United and US Airways terminated pension plans while in bankruptcy. Now, if either attempted to merge with a carrier that still offers a pension, a battle likely would ensue with employees who would want to keep the sometimes lucrative retirement benefit.

"That would not be a trivial issue," said Aaron Gellman, a professor at Northwestern University's Transportation Center. "It's complicated."

As a result, reaping the benefits from a merger "is going to take a couple years, no matter what scenario is proposed," Gellman said.

The most recent large merger took place last year, when America West Airlines combined with the US Airways. The new US Airways faces challenges, including integrating different reservation technologies and resolving labor issues, but the rejuvenated carrier has quickly begun outperforming many of its peers financially.

The merger was made easier because US Airways was on financial life support. It was in the midst of its second bankruptcy in three years and had given up planes, cut pay and benefits, and jettisoned its pension plans. Many industry analysts predicted liquidation.

US Airways Chief Executive Douglas Parker said he thinks there are financial opportunities by combining with a carrier going through financial reorganization.

"Mergers can create a lot of value," he said. "We clearly demonstrated that putting two companies together can create value."

RedeyeAV8r

[QUOTE=RockBottom;54268]Airline merger rumors flying

US Airways Chief Executive Douglas Parker said he thinks there are financial opportunities by combining with a carrier going through financial reorganization.
"Mergers can create a lot of value," he said. "We clearly demonstrated that putting two companies together can create value."[/QUOTE]

Yeah sure a great value ........just like USAir and PSA or USAir and Piedmont........
USAIR parked a fleet and furloughed Pilots equivalent to the size of PSA and Piedmont.

Or AA /Air Cal or AA / RENO or AA / TWA. Real value

Now if he means that he gets value personally ( or other Airline CEO's), ie, a big fat bonus check......I just might agree with him, otherwise.......NOT!!

fireman0174

It's in the eye of the beholder and perspective.

Management that gets all sorts of bonuses = great!

Line pilot = the more junior you end up, the less it is desirable.